• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent would you say Situation Ethics is a useful ethical theory?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Nathan Wright To what extent would you say Situation Ethics is a useful ethical theory? People see Situation Ethics as being a useful Ethical Theory, but as with any ethical theory there are strengths and weaknesses of the theory. One strength is that it is an alternative Christian Ethic which is consistent with the Gospel. This means it goes directly with the teachings of Jesus' lesson of choosing love over the law. This shows that Jesus puts God and his faith above everything else even the law. Due to these Situation Ethics is seen as being consistent with the New Testament. Another strength is Situation Ethics being flexible and practical. ...read more.


This means that it isn?t as valid because it relies on one person?s perception of a certain situation. The main question which is raised is how can an individual decide which is the most loving action? This causes problems because we could do an unloving thing and justify it because we think it will cause a loving thing at the end, when really the loving thing will never happen. Situation Ethics could prove unworkable because it?s hard to think and conclude all the consequences of a particular action. One other weakness is that Situation Ethics is individualistic because everyone sees things from their own perspective. An issue with this is people may pollute unconditional love with selfish human tendencies. ...read more.


Another good thing is that it is very flexible and considers the complexities of human life which other ethical theories do not consider such as a legalist. Therefore you can choose the best of a bad situation and make it not as bad. On the other had it does have many weaknesses with the main one being that it really does depend on the person who is making the decision and not actually what is best to do. For example a mad man may have different ideas of good compared to a priest. Also an atheist may have different views to a catholic. So it all depends on the person and as a person they can choose the most loving thing or have a selfish human tendency and do something which would benefit them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Examine the key features of situation ethics, and the main criticisms of it, and ...

    Joseph Fletcher identified three approaches to morality: Legalism, a conservative, rule-based morality like that of the Pharisees, or as Fletcher said, a morality in which "Solutions are preset, and you can look them up in a book - a Bible or a confessor's manual"; Antinomianism, the polar opposite of legalism

  2. Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

    In this case, we must treat homosexuals with respect and not judge them for their way of living. We must show compassion for every human being, no matter what his or her race, creed or sexuality. While these religious views are still seen as highly acceptable, it is fast becoming

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    One of the first major challenges to Kant's reasoning came from a Swiss philosopher, Benjamin Constant. He said that since truth telling must be universal according to Kant's theory, one must (if asked) tell a known murderer the location of his prey.

  2. Explain Fletcher's theory of Situation Ethics (13) and Assess the strengths and weaknesses of ...

    Law represents part of the resources, which can be brought to bear on a situation requiring a decision. It's a resource, which represents the distillation of human experience. (Earlier thinkers were not as rigid as Fletcher leads people to think).

  1. "Religious ethics are not the best approach to environmental issues". Discuss.

    A hypothetical imperative is dependant on an 'if', for example: "if you want to loose weight, take regular exercise" whereas a categorical imperative is absolute and unconditional. For Kant only categorical imperatives are true moral statements and demand action. The following statement: "if you care about humanity and its future

  2. Business Ethics

    * According to this model, management's goals are purely selfish (if the individual is acting on his own behalf), or focused only on profitability and organizational success (if the individual is acting as an agent of his or her employer).

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    On the negative side, the social consequences and effects on the cloned child cannot yet be imagined. It is unclear whether or not this "uniqueness" will be a burden too large for any child to carry. There is also the possibility that the gene pool will become smaller as more

  2. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    Even if we do have a purpose we have no way of knowing exactly what that purpose is and whether we should judge it according to nature. Adding to this point, Aquinas also assumed that every individual has a particular function to fulfil and a specific purpose however this goes

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work