• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

The effects of the extension of a spring on the time it takes a weight to oscillate.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The effects of the extension of a spring on the time it takes a weight to oscillate.

Introduction

I am investigating the relationship between the extension of the spring and the effect it has on the time it takes for the wait on the spring to oscillate.

Scientific Knowledge

image00.pngimage00.png

image02.pngimage02.png

image02.pngimage02.png

image02.pngimage02.png

image02.png

image02.pngimage01.png

image02.png

image02.png

image04.pngimage02.pngimage03.png

image02.png

image02.png

image02.png

image04.png

image05.pngimage06.png

As the spring is extended the spring stores potential kinetic energy. So the larger X is, the more energy is stored. To work out the energy we must work out the amount of work done first:

Work Done = Force x Distance

When the mass is released the potential energy of the spring is converted into kinetic energy of the mass which is at a maximum when it passes through the mid-point of the oscillation which is the point where the spring is not extended at all.

 So the work done by the spring is equal to the mass times the acceleration of the mass times the distance. This gives the energy released by the spring:

Work Done = mass x acceleration x distance

At the centre point Kinetic energy is equal to Potential energy. To work out the kinetic energy:

K.E = 1/2 mv2

...read more.

Middle

 for 50,100,150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500 and 550 grams.For each mass 3 readings were taken and the average calculated.Then the time for 1 oscillation was calculated.

Preliminary Results

Time period for 10 Oscillations (secs)

Mass (g)

1

2

3

Avg. (3 s.f)

Average time period for 1 oscillation (secs)

100

3.59

3.57

3.72

3.63

0.36

150

4.96

4.84

4.88

4.89

0.49

200

5.34

5.46

5.61

5.47

0.55

250

6.11

6.11

6.32

6.18

0.62

300

6.77

6.87

6.92

6.85

0.69

350

7.27

7.38

7.48

7.38

0.74

400

8.06

7.98

8.09

8.04

0.80

450

8.84

8.64

8.65

8.71

0.87

500

9.92

8.77

8.79

9.16

0.92

550

9.41

9.11

9.26

9.26

0.93

Points highlighted by the preliminary

  • 50g does not work well so we shall omit this from the proper experiment.
  • We do not have enough time to do all the results so we shall also omit 550g
  • By the preliminary results we can see that method and equipment is very good

Possible Factors that might vary during the experiment

  • Distance
  • Force
  • Time
  • Mass

Factor

Can we control it?

How?

Distance

Yes

To keep the distance constant we must pull down the mass, and therefore extend it by the same amount.

Force

Yes

The force is dependant on the spring so if the same spring is used each time the force will stay the same.

Time

No

Time cannot be controlled as it is the result of the other 3 and is the factor we are measuring.

Mass

Yes

We could but we don’t want to as this is the variable in this experiment.

Method

  1. The equipment is setup as in the diagram below.
  2. The weight is put on the weight hanger.
...read more.

Conclusion

We could use a program called log it and light gates with a laptop to make the timing more precise.

So these results back up our scientific knowledge and our prediction within the limits of my range of measurement. It proves that the extension affects how much time it takes for the mass to oscillate because the equation F=MA must be held to.

Evaluation

The procedure:

  • The method is good as it provided us with as accurate results as we could get with the equipment we had.
  • There was difficulty in keeping a stable force as the spring slowly degraded as the experiment went on.
  • We could also do a bigger range to get a more accurate result.

The Results:

  • The results were very good and we had almost prefect straight lines the only deviations were probably caused by the inaccuracies in time keeping.
  • If the line does not go thought the origin this is the effective mass of the spring.

Further Work:

  • Do more repeats
  • Do a bigger range to check that the straight line continues.

Conclusion:

Our experiment worked quite well and we collected good results. We proved the prediction and backed up the spring constant theory. If we had more time we would have had even better results.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The writer attempted this question to an okay standard. It was good that the writer used their initiative and decided to do background work in addition to a preliminary investigation. However, the background knowledge could have gone into a bit ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The writer attempted this question to an okay standard. It was good that the writer used their initiative and decided to do background work in addition to a preliminary investigation. However, the background knowledge could have gone into a bit more detail. So for example, when the writer mentioned "At the centre point Kinetic energy is equal to Potential energy" the writer could have explained why this relation is true. The writer could have mentioned units as well, which they don't mention until they are recording data (and still don't mention these units on their graph). Although the preliminary work is not as important as the main investigation, the writer should still have written a list of apparatus and said what they would measure before they even look at the diagram. In addition, even though they said that they decided to not have the 50g reading, they should have still measured it and explained that due to the amount of error within the reading it would make the final results less precise.

The writer should have clearly shown where the main investigation was starting as they made it seem like it was carrying on from the preliminary investigation. Again, in regards to the apparatus they should have mentioned particular measurements or what type of apparatus they where using (so for ruler, how long would it be?) In terms of data, this was collected okay. However, the graphs could have been drawn better. Although it was good that the writer did do error bars. The writer mentioned "I do not have any anomalies as all the points are close to the line." But they could have explained why this is the case. The analysis could have been written better. For example the writer says "The spring would slowly break and deform, this would change the force of the spring therefore making the force not constant." But doesn't explain why (and this could go back to the range of masses the writer chose to use). The conclusion could have gone into more detail (for example, suggesting if the material can have an affect on the spring constant).

Level of analysis

For the main body of the report, the writer has used good scientific language, but could have explained precision and accuracy throughout the report. Because they didn't explain their points clearly enough (so for example why a 50g interval for the masses) it meant that the level of analysis was not very deep.

Quality of writing

The writer kept switching between saying "I" to "we". This has made the report less valid and what the writer should have done it spoken in first person throughout the entire report. Spelling was good. However, the reader should have proof read through their work in much more detail.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by cpdavis 28/02/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology essays

  1. Investigating the relationship between the mass and time period in a spring-mass system

    I will also make sure that the base of the stand is under the weights and a spring to prevent it from falling over. * Independent variables to be kept constant - The spring used (and its k - the spring constant).

  2. The aim of this investigation is to examine the effect on the spring constant ...

    117.50 0.7g 299.67 278.17 599.67 554.67 159.07 137.57 0.8g 346.90 325.40 673.67 628.67 178.33 156.83 0.9g 383.83 362.33 753.33 708.33 197.87 176.37 1.0g 411.33 389.83 828.33 783.33 219.07 197.57 These results tables have been used to plot several graphs which are included.

  1. Measuring spring constant using oscilations of a mass.

    constant and the effective mass that will be a bit different then the value that force/extension data will tell me because I would be carrying out this experiment differently technically and theoretically then the technique that was used to work out the force/extension data and the worked out spring constant form it.

  2. An investigation into the time period of a mass-spring oscillating system.

    not predict that the time period difference and mass on the spring would not be proportional. The website http://www.ncvs.org/vpt/equation/chapter4/ states that the following equation is the general formula for the frequency of simple harmonic oscillation - "The frequency of oscillation, F0, is the number of back-and-forth movements made per second.

  1. Investigating the Vertical Oscillations of a Loaded Spring.

    The number of cycles per second, or hertz (Hz), is known as the frequency of the oscillation. A swinging pendulum eventually comes to rest if no further forces act upon it. The force that causes it to stop oscillating is called damping.

  2. Experiment B11: Measuring focal length of lenses

    Although method (b) is more complicated than method (a), it is still worth to use. No graph and less calculation need to be plotted and done to find out the focal length, this will make fewer errors occur. However, more time is needed to be spent to set up and finish the experiment, as there are many apparatus used in this method.

  1. Investigating the relation between wave speed and tension in a slinky spring

    Tension (N) Distance (m) TRY 1 Time (s) TRY 2 Time (s) TRY 3 Time (s) Average Time (s) Speed (m/s) 0.5 1.10 0.43 0.49 0.45 0.46 2.41 1.0 1.92 0.79 0.77 0.80 0.79 2.44 1.5 2.30 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 2.57 2.0 2.79 1.02 1.00 1.05 1.02 2.73 2.5 3.62 1.15 1.20 1.21 1.19 3.05 3.0 4.44

  2. Determine the value of 'g', where 'g' is the acceleration due to gravity.

    Therefore I am going to introduce the effective mass and the value of gravity can be found as shown below: Let Ms be the effective mass of the spring, then; =() AND = ( ) By substituting for m in the equation above: =()

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work