• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Class differences in educational attainment.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Lucie Jelfs TIP: use examples and make sure the answer links to the question. 1. Becker put forward the term ?Ideal Pupil? to show how teachers have a preference for a certain kind of pupil that they would like to teach. The pupil usually has the characteristics of a middle class child, for example they have a desire to learn and are hardworking and quiet. 2. Students from the upper social classes and those who have attended independent schools are more likely to gain places at elite universities such as LSE and Oxbridge even when they have the same A-level grades as students from state schools because: - They speak with elaborated code. This means that they do not assume that the listener knows what they are talking about and they include as much detail as they can. This means that they are more formal in their speech and will speak better at an interview than someone of a lower class. Thus giving them more of a chance of getting into the elite universities because they will be liked more than someone who uses a restricted code and slang. ...read more.

Middle

Both internal (factors within schools) and external (factors outside of schools) play a part in the difference in attainment between social classes. One internal factor that has a major impact on working class children is labelling. Instead of judging children by their ability and intelligence they judge them on their social class and background. Becker explains that teachers have an ?ideal pupil?, a pupil that has middle class characteristics such as obedience and conformity. Therefore anyone that does not fall into this category is ?labelled? and treated differently. This can then lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy. The teachers have judged the children and labelled those who are not middle class as failures or not going to do well. Because of this and the different treatment they receive, the working class children start to believe that they will not achieve. Thus meaning that they do not want to work hard and don?t see the point in achieving so will fail. What the teacher expected happens. However it is not just this that causes the child to fail. The working class have a sub-culture that is different from the ?right? dominant white/middle class of Britain. ...read more.

Conclusion

The child may then fall behind because they have missed out on something that all the other children in their class have had. For example there may be a school trip to a museum that a working class family cannot afford to send their child on. In future lessons the teacher may refer to something seen on that trip so the child that didn?t get to go will be lost and won?t know what they teacher is saying whereas the other students will. Because of this we cannot blame the curriculum for the underachievement in working class pupils, it offers some of the experiences needed for education but the material deprivation means that the child cannot experience it. On the other hand a lot of schools offer help and support to the children from a working class background who cannot afford a lot, and help financially with the cost of a trip. Therefore you could say that it is not the curriculum or material deprivation that causes the child to underachieve. Overall internal factors have an impact of the achievement of working class students. However these internal factors are caused by the external. Therefore it is arguable that they would have little effect if the external factors were taken away. Thus meaning that they external factors are the greatest influence on social-class differences in educational achievement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Is the Underachievement of Ethnic Minority Children due to a Racist School System?

    I then went on to talk about my contextual data, and asked him to respond to Coard theory that racism whether overt or covert caused low self-esteem in ethnic minority children. " It really depends on what the child is like, and the action they take against racism.

  2. Examine the ways in which factors in pupils' home backgrounds may affect their educational ...

    The theory of cultural deprivation has been attacked as by placing the blame for failure on the child and his or her background attention is therefore being diverted from the deficiencies of the education system. Interactionists focus on processes within the education system, which result in different levels of achievement.

  1. Explain the influence of social class and gender on educational achievement

    higher proportion of those gaining higher qualifications than would be expected from their representation in the sample, while those from a manual background were over-presented among the unqualified' (General Household Survey 1991, 1994 p201). . A variety of causes have been suggested for the relative educational 'failure' of the working

  2. Which has the greatest impact on educational attainment – gender, social class or ethnicity?

    Douglas (3) (1964) places particular emphasis on the parent's attitude - how much value and the degree of interest showed towards their child's education. Douglas argues that the lack of interest or failure to encourage by parents is significant factors in poor educational performance of their child.

  1. Discuss in what ways social class impacts on educational experiences.

    that accepts pupils of all abilities. Their aim was to make sure that all children were to be educated exactly the same regardless of their class, ethnicity and gender leading to greater equality and acceptance of diversity. However what they failed to recognise was that educating such a mixed ability

  2. Social factors effecting educational attainment.

    class, the working class children will do worse than the middle class children. Hyman theorizes that this is down to the values and morals of the different classes and they would be dictated these classes by the home factors mentioned earlier so there is a strong argument that home factors

  1. To what extent are school factors responsible for social class differences in educational attainment?

    Colin lacey found couple ways in which student respond to streaming one of which is polarisation this when pupils respond to streaming by moving towards one of two opposite?poles?or extreme. Pupil subculture is a group of pupils who share similar values and behaviour pattern they have the pro-school subculture which

  2. Black Male perception, of Secondary School Attainment and Opportunities. "Explore reasons for the academic ...

    Swann gathered through his research that racism had a casual effect on the educational underachievement. The Macpherson report[5] was based on the Metropolitan Police Service, regarding the case of Stephen Lawrence. The MacPherson Report also recommended that the National Curriculum in schools should be adapted to reflect society by valuing cultural diversity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work