• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the view that nuclear family did not exist in Britain before industrialisation

Extracts from this document...


Examine the view that nuclear family did not exist in Britain before industrialisation Whist Britain was undergoing industrialisation, a lot of societal changes took place. Changes that not only affected population but had an impact on family life and the way it was run. Parsons (1955) believed that families were mainly extended before industrialisation which meant that nuclear families didn't exist during pre-industrialisation. These extended needed the kinship to be able to be producers as it was mainly an agricultural economy, so they would work together mainly farming as their labour. This was then used to provide clothes, shelter, and food etc. So the family network was a strong one as they played different roles in the household to maintain it. That is why Parsons believed that all this changed when the manufacturing economy came into place, and this caused four major changes to the family. This new economy was now demanding a workforce which was more geographically mobile, so to take advantage of this opportunity people were more likely to move away from their villages to the towns, therefore the family ties were broken and nuclear family was formed. ...read more.


This was believed to be a natural division of labour because women are known for their maternal instincts and would be best for child upbringing; Parsons found the partner's relationships were complementary to each other each contributing with their own unique roles. He concluded that due this nuclear unit the economy thrived and only because of this it was more effective, because the outcome of this was the work force required was now geographically mobile which was needed for this industrialisation. However there are many criticisms of Parson's theory as Peter Laslett's (1971 study of English parish shows indifferent results to what parsons had said about no nuclear families existing during pre-industrialisation. The records showed that it was only 10 per cent of households with extended families during the pre-industrialisation time which contradicts Parsons Theory. Laslett has shown with his study that the nuclear family unit was predominant, and sociologists claimed this was an important factor in speeding up the process of industrial revolution, as families were already geographically mobile. Even then Laslett's study was based on statistics which doesn't give a true or detailed insight in to what the families actually did. ...read more.


In the 1950s they did a study in London, Bethnal Green. Here they found that even at that time when industrialisation had advanced there were still a large proportion of existing extended families. It was a slow change due to the tight family network which was bonded with emotional attachment, and support in childcare, jobs and money matters. They also claimed that it was after the 1960s when the extended families went in decline, which also contradicts Parsons perspective. This was when the working-class were rehoused and the education act came about allowing people to move away from home to achieve higher jobs etc. Thus it slowly separated the nuclear families as geographical mobility was needed. In conclusion they saw that it was in the late 20th century when it became more of a social norm. Overall the view that nuclear families didn't exist before industrialisation does not have enough evidence to back the point. Now there is still discussion over this view over whether or not nuclear unit families were either the product of industrialisation or the cause. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Family & Marriage section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Family & Marriage essays

  1. Examine the view that the nuclear family is universal. (24)

    Such households may, however, include children who are cared for by two adult females or two adult males. The children may be been adopted, be the result of a previous heterosexual relationship, or they may have been produced using new reproductive technologies involving sperm donation or surrogate motherhood.

  2. Assess the view that Industrialisation led to the decline of the extended family and ...

    Secondly came 'The Early Industrial Family' were the family wasn't working together with the industrial revolution and they became wage earners but the extended family supported them during these difficult times. Most working class families were extended in the industrial areas and the mother provided support in the difficult times.

  1. Examine the view that the nuclear family did not exist in the U.K before ...

    Parsons referred to this as structural differentiation, which resulted in the workplace and home life becoming separated. This only left the family with two functions to specialise in; primary socialisation and stabilisation. Primary socialisation is the act of teaching kids the norms and values of society.

  2. Why family formations have changed in Britain.

    Marxist's believe that the family provides a steady supply of workers to the economy free of charge. Marxist's also believe that the key function of the family is to provide socialisation skills to their children and teach them the correct discipline and the correct attitudes of obedience to survive in society.

  1. Examine the relationship between Industrialisation and the changes in the family

    The only problem with Michael Anderson's analysis is that he only looked at 10% of the census and Preston may not have been the best place to take a sample from to analyse. Peter Laslett (1965) believed that the extended family did not exist as a dominant family in pre-industrial Britain.

  2. Explain how and why family forms have changed in Britain.

    Family forms within the British Asian community have changed a great deal as to previous years with family members moving away from their family home and local community in order to seek employment or build their own families. Also the family forms have changed in the sense that it is

  1. Is the nuclear family in decline?

    Persons believed that families are factories which produce human personalities. According to him the institution of nuclear family is more peculiar and important to the western industrial societies, since it is largely isolated from kins, thus couples increasingly look to each other for emotional support.

  2. Families and Households. Notes on Diversity Childhood and Industrialisation.

    Argued that the family has four basic functions; sexual, economic, educational and reproductive Tallcott Parsons 1. Came up with the ?warm bath theory?. 2. Argued that the family has two basic and irreducible functions; socialisation and stabilisation Engels ? Argues the family has an economic of keeping wealth within the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work