• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There should be no censorship in the United Kingdom. Discuss arguments for and against the statement.

Extracts from this document...


Kerry Bettinson There should be no censorship in the United Kingdom. Discuss arguments for and against the statement. All media texts that come into contact with the public are to a certain extent censored, with all intention that it is in our best interest. Many people would argue that government censorship in information released to the press is wrong, and should be stopped. However censorship laws on television and films are in place to protect the children in society from being exposed to unsuitable harmful material. Firstly the issue of government censorship of information that is given to the public on current issues or events that they are dealing with. In a time of war, such as the moment it is perhaps understandable that some information has to be held for national security, but at times of peace why is information retained? For example why was there no public enquiry into the foot and mouth crisis? ...read more.


If these limitations did not exist it would be solely the parents responsibility to censor what their children watch. I feel that this could prove to be a harder task than initially thought especially with the increase in numbers of children that have televisions in their bedrooms and on children that may have parents that work late. Films are classified in to categories depending on the type of material they contain. Harmless films will be certified universal and suitable for all, these will not contain any material that could be offensive to anyone. The next step is parental guidance, where it is left as the parents decision whether to allow their children to watch the film if it is thought suitable. This may contain a couple of mild swear words, or perhaps references to sex. After this it no longer becomes the parents responsibility to allow a child to view a film at a cinema or take one out of a video store. ...read more.


Other things such as adverts are also censored for the protection of young people, for example alcohol adverts cannot be shown during advertising breaks in CBBC children programme. This is correct censorship as it is possible that this could encourage underage drinking. I think that there relevance and need for censorship depends on the circumstance. For example where I believe that government information should not be retained form the public when it is of no national security risk I do believe that in the very recent Prince Harry incident censorship is needed. There has been a restriction placed on the press to limit the information they can reveal, and to stop filling hundreds of column inches of tabloid newspapers slating him. Here it is appropriate for his protection that this restriction order was placed. As a conclusion I feel that a lot of television, cinema and some magazines should be censored from children and that allowing the parents to take full responsibility could be disastrous. Censorship is needed but does have a time and place in society in the United Kingdom. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. Do we need Censorship in the Media?

    loss of jobs. This movie was supposed to be realistic as it included swearing and sexual immorality. The reason the BBFC didn't want this movie to be shown because they were scared that a revolt might start and all

  2. Multiculturalism. Thesis Statement: Is the concept of multiculturalism a wise choice in modern day ...

    Any business can be affected by outsourcing. No matter how big or small a business is a business is able to outsource services that they could not be profitable on their own with. Now I want to take a look at how multiculturalism impacted our media.

  1. Censorship is necessary to protect the public

    because it would result in shocking programmes that would disgust almost everyone initially, then become mainstream. This is because controversy sells. Presently, the internet seems the most complex part of the media to control, this is because it comprises so much content which is ever-increasing and from country to country, there are varying laws.

  2. Moral Panic and media folk devils.

    They have a good understanding on issues such as race and benefits and have idealistic solutions to offer. They seem to understand what problems there are with the system and do not just offer opinionated answers. They do not seem to have been greatly influenced by the media although there

  1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of Censorship.

    I am fully aware that this is not a joking matter, but although there are a few anomalies in my theory, just because the appointed moderators find something disturbing or frightening in some way it's no reflection of how the rest of the country will feel about it.

  2. Ireland has a long history of censorship but this has been employed for different ...

    In order to remain neutral, any expression of opinion which might seem to favour one side over another was censored; radio newscasts were confined to reading without comment, the dispatches from each side; all weather forecasts were stopped in case they helped the planes or ships of either side in

  1. Explain and Discuss Moral Panics.

    In the 1990s such issues are not confined to isolated and distinct targets such as the black mugger, the drug addict or the promiscuous teenager but can cover a whole range of individuals, so essentially no one in society may feel completely safe from possible persecution as a result of a future panic.

  2. The History of Censorship

    beliefs of the city in which one lived, and if they did not they would likely be discriminated against by the government and possibly even ostracized by society. There could be repercussions, supported by legal sanctions, for those who spoke improperly about religious issues in public.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work