• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The arts deal in the particular, the individual and the personal while the sciences deal in the general, the universal and the collective." To what extent does this statement obscure both Areas of Knowledge?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Linda Lapina TOK final essay Word count: 1584 "The arts deal in the particular, the individual and the personal while the sciences deal in the general, the universal and the collective." To what extent does this statement obscure both Areas of Knowledge? Areas of Knowledge are the expedients possessed by individuals to form new knowledge. The given claim implies that arts can only be useful in obtaining personal knowledge, while sciences help us form universal knowledge that can be shared between all individuals. The given statement regards arts as only actual to an individual, while referring to sciences as something entirely universal. And we cannot deny that science basically makes generalizations from getting to know the particular, while the most powerful works of art make an emphasis on specific in order to influence individual observers. Besides, there is a vital difference between scientific and artistic knowledge. There is much smaller possibility to raise empathy and thus have an effect on individual by using a generalization. Assuming that the whole point of the arts is to arouse new thoughts and feelings in the individual, to create a dialogue between the artist and the audience, arts also commonly create compassion. ...read more.

Middle

Being a human more or less means having emotions, and arts indisputably are attempting to deal with our feelings. Whether it is done successfully or not depends on each specific work of art and its audience. An example of such personal, still cumulative issue is human conscience. It is a subject that arts often choose to deal with, but, at the same time, it cannot be generalised. Even two people from the same country and group of society do not share the same conscience, not even talking about different peoples and cultures. It is easy to find examples of different sets of principles. An American corporation can take away the land of native Indians to cut down their rainforests and find nothing unacceptable in it even though their dollar says "in God we trust" and the Bible says, "thou shalt not desire for your fellow human's property". Meanwhile, the Indian tribe can scalp their enemies while they are still alive and not find anything unacceptable in doing that. Of course, the same works of art will not affect these different cultures with different principles of ethics in the same way. Even though possibility to generalise this issue is very limited, there is a universality in being a human and having a conscience and it lays in having ...read more.

Conclusion

In other words, objects that require proof and logical justification should be dealt with using science, and more humane, less rational subjects should be left to be dealt with the help of arts. However, I do not agree with this assumption because that would make the judgements and knowledge on these subjects too eliminated. For knowledge claims to be more justified and legitimate, they should be based upon on a wide variety of sources coming from maximally broad totality of Areas of Knowledge. Using one AoK per one issue would result in the obtained knowledge being obscure and deficient. We can summarise that, to an extent, the given statement is true- both Areas of Knowledge most commonly have different routes of approaching the knower: science appeals to individual through generalizations while arts influence each individual by using the specific. However, art, even though showing us the specific, can lead an individual to form very universal, general knowledge, whilst from generalizations made using science we can also form knowledge about particular. Further on, both AoKs can be compatible in obtaining new knowledge, and it can make our knowledge claims wider, more genuine and justified. This demonstrates that regarding arts as dealing solely with the particular and sciences as purely universal obscures the nature and eliminates the use of both AoKs. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Art section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Art essays

  1. Artists express their personal experiences, social values and cultural beliefs through a number of ...

    Whereas this is a realistic artwork, as King-Smith has super imposed contrasting images, in creating the contrast of cultures. As Leah King-Smith searches for her personal identity between these two cultures, her work is a way of expressing her tension, and by linking these two images she has created a much more important and powerful meaning.

  2. The Effects of the Nazi Political Movement on German Visual Arts

    improve it."6 Experimentation was compulsory, in order to reach innovative goal of integrating artistic beauty with practical usefulness. The Bauhaus had a new way of teaching where functional craftsmanship in every field was used to not only make a social comment as art does, but was also practiced in an attempt to solve industrial problems of mechanical mass production.

  1. The boundaries between culture and nature have collapsed and the body has become flexible

    O Fanny - art thou dry? Who used to run with lusty juice Where is thy unfettered passion, Insistent that all should bow to thy desire? And Grecian waist so sweetly curved Lost beneath mounds of sub-cutaneous-ness Thickened out of recognition Art thou faire?

  2. To what extent do you sympathise the character of George

    The real burden Lennie brings to George and his willingness to carry this burden make me sympathize with him more and any other character. The last reason I sympathize with George is that he has to make the cruel but the only decision: shoot Lennie himself.

  1. We are more likely to be mistaken in our generalization than in our particular ...

    However, you still cannot generalize by saying that African countries are being ruined by the virus. Before you do, you have to take other factors into consideration like for example starvation, lack of hygiene, mal-nutrition and so on, these are the particular observations that should be done before you can generalize anything.

  2. To what extent do you find the influence of Rousseau's views on the relationship ...

    According to Rousseau, the general will is that which is best for the state as a whole and the particular will is the particular desires of an individual. (p105, Blk 3). As the particular will is a product of appetite and the general will a product of reason, we should obey the general will which makes us noble and good.

  1. Some writers have argued that each discipline has 'essential characteristics'. To what extent do ...

    From Picasso to Duchamp the Avant-garde philosophy is always present. Cubism was not intended to create a new movement when it was first found. Picasso said 'when we invented Cubism we had no intention whatever of inventing Cubism. We wanted simply to express what was in us.

  2. Discuss the ideas about the responsibilities of the individual that these three examples might ...

    It is a large oil on canvas measuring 3.25mts x 4.22mts in the Neo-Classical style and was painted for an exhibition at the Salon in Paris. This painting falls into the genre of history paintings, its theme is of a moralizing nature.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work