• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The arts deal in the particular, the individual and the personal while the sciences deal in the general, the universal and the collective." To what extent does this statement obscure both Areas of Knowledge?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Linda Lapina TOK final essay Word count: 1584 "The arts deal in the particular, the individual and the personal while the sciences deal in the general, the universal and the collective." To what extent does this statement obscure both Areas of Knowledge? Areas of Knowledge are the expedients possessed by individuals to form new knowledge. The given claim implies that arts can only be useful in obtaining personal knowledge, while sciences help us form universal knowledge that can be shared between all individuals. The given statement regards arts as only actual to an individual, while referring to sciences as something entirely universal. And we cannot deny that science basically makes generalizations from getting to know the particular, while the most powerful works of art make an emphasis on specific in order to influence individual observers. Besides, there is a vital difference between scientific and artistic knowledge. There is much smaller possibility to raise empathy and thus have an effect on individual by using a generalization. Assuming that the whole point of the arts is to arouse new thoughts and feelings in the individual, to create a dialogue between the artist and the audience, arts also commonly create compassion. ...read more.

Middle

Being a human more or less means having emotions, and arts indisputably are attempting to deal with our feelings. Whether it is done successfully or not depends on each specific work of art and its audience. An example of such personal, still cumulative issue is human conscience. It is a subject that arts often choose to deal with, but, at the same time, it cannot be generalised. Even two people from the same country and group of society do not share the same conscience, not even talking about different peoples and cultures. It is easy to find examples of different sets of principles. An American corporation can take away the land of native Indians to cut down their rainforests and find nothing unacceptable in it even though their dollar says "in God we trust" and the Bible says, "thou shalt not desire for your fellow human's property". Meanwhile, the Indian tribe can scalp their enemies while they are still alive and not find anything unacceptable in doing that. Of course, the same works of art will not affect these different cultures with different principles of ethics in the same way. Even though possibility to generalise this issue is very limited, there is a universality in being a human and having a conscience and it lays in having ...read more.

Conclusion

In other words, objects that require proof and logical justification should be dealt with using science, and more humane, less rational subjects should be left to be dealt with the help of arts. However, I do not agree with this assumption because that would make the judgements and knowledge on these subjects too eliminated. For knowledge claims to be more justified and legitimate, they should be based upon on a wide variety of sources coming from maximally broad totality of Areas of Knowledge. Using one AoK per one issue would result in the obtained knowledge being obscure and deficient. We can summarise that, to an extent, the given statement is true- both Areas of Knowledge most commonly have different routes of approaching the knower: science appeals to individual through generalizations while arts influence each individual by using the specific. However, art, even though showing us the specific, can lead an individual to form very universal, general knowledge, whilst from generalizations made using science we can also form knowledge about particular. Further on, both AoKs can be compatible in obtaining new knowledge, and it can make our knowledge claims wider, more genuine and justified. This demonstrates that regarding arts as dealing solely with the particular and sciences as purely universal obscures the nature and eliminates the use of both AoKs. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Art section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Art essays

  1. To what extent do you sympathise the character of George

    This is a tough decision, but it is the only right thing to do at that time otherwise Lennie would be killed brutely by Curley or be held in a dark room with a dog chain on his neck. So it is better to kill Lennie peacefully, and by George himself.

  2. We are more likely to be mistaken in our generalization than in our particular ...

    However, you still cannot generalize by saying that African countries are being ruined by the virus. Before you do, you have to take other factors into consideration like for example starvation, lack of hygiene, mal-nutrition and so on, these are the particular observations that should be done before you can generalize anything.

  1. To what extent do you find the influence of Rousseau's views on the relationship ...

    The focus on the father seems to signify that he is the central character. The sons on the left stretch their hands willingly to receive the swords. This reflected Rousseau's view that the individual puts aside their particular wills and thinks according to the general will.

  2. Some writers have argued that each discipline has 'essential characteristics'. To what extent do ...

    From Picasso to Duchamp the Avant-garde philosophy is always present. Cubism was not intended to create a new movement when it was first found. Picasso said 'when we invented Cubism we had no intention whatever of inventing Cubism. We wanted simply to express what was in us.

  1. Discuss the ideas about the responsibilities of the individual that these three examples might ...

    The women are shown mourning their losses in a corner'2. In "The Lictors .... His Sons" Brutus' responsibilities lay heavy on his shoulders. Having overthrown the Monarchy and establishing a Roman Republic, Brutus' sons are involved in a failed plot to restore the monarchy.

  2. Using explorative strategies to help understand the 'Coca-Cola Advert' lyrics and Picasso's Guernica.

    Meanwhile, the Coke People began to stir. Moving with extreme control and precision, we slowly rose to face each other. Using the full length of our arms and hands, we made repetitive gestures fuelled with contrasting emotions of shock, hate, and love. Our body language became lyrical, approaching the feeling of a ritual dance.

  1. The arts deal in the particular, the individual and the personal while the sciences ...

    Surely art is more than an interaction between the artist and his/her work. If we think back on the Dada movement, which took place during and after World War I, the Dadaists intended to express their protest against all western culture, especially militarism, through some distinctly unconventional and sometimes disturbing art1.

  2. Discuss the merits of Burgin's statement as a basis on which to distinguish postmodernism ...

    Kant thereby established a precedent for using the techniques of a particular medium to define and refine that medium, a process referred to by Greenberg as 'self-criticism'. This implies that painting, rather than 'using art to conceal art' (ibid) by creating illusionistic space and depth, should rather use art 'to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work