Alternative Approaches to meeting Peugeot Objectives

Authors Avatar

                                                                                 Ben Hampson

A1: Alternative Approaches to meeting Peugeot Objectives

Are Peugeot using the best methods for the line of work they are involved in? Is there a way of improving their efficiency, quality and productivity? We should be able to tell if there is by looking at the theory known as benchmarking.

Benchmarking can be defined as imitating the standards of an established leader in quality and attempting to be better them.

Benchmarking is a technique used by some businesses to help them discover the ‘best’ methods of production available and then adopt them.  Benchmarking involves: -

  • Finding out what makes the difference, in the customer’s eyes, between an ordinary supplier and an excellent supplier.
  • Setting standards for business operations based on the best practice that can be found.
  • Finding out how these best companies meeting those standards.
  • Applying both competitors’ standards and, if possible, exceed them.

What should be benchmarked?

I

Who should the company benchmark against?

I

How is the information obtained?

I

How should the information be analysed?

I

How should the information be used?

These are the five main steps in Benchmarking.  The first step is to identify exactly what the company intends to benchmark.  Benchmarks that are important for customer satisfaction might include consistency of product, correct invoices, shorter delivery times, shorter lead times and improved after sales service.

Peugeot could decide to benchmark better sales figures.  What better company to benchmark against than ‘Ford’, the leading company in market penetration.  If Peugeot were to implement the ford tactics, then Peugeot’s market share and penetration could change for the better.  The information can be obtained by looking at watching the customer service teams and showroom dealers in action, web sites, visiting the ford base and looking around, watching the production process, study their strategies etc.  The information obtained should be analysed to see if the Peugeot team could implement these strategies in theory, to see whether the ideas are actually worth perusing.  The information can be used by actually putting these ideas into practice.  This will only be performed after the primary research has been collected and analysed by the Peugeot specialists.

In order to ensure productivity is maintained during times of crisis, for example, it would certainly be advisable for the company to take measures to secure the safety of the chain of supply. Peugeot relies on numerous companies in the UK to supply parts to their production plants for use in car manufacture, and supply lines could be disrupted in the event of rail strikes or petrol strikes, as were experienced in 2000 and 2001. Storing a number of parts in the factory in the event of such crises would waste space and money during the time that supply lines are working well, so one alternative method would be to conduct research into the feasibility of Peugeot producing the parts themselves. If this was done then there would be no problem in the event of transport disruption to the production line continuing, for the company would have no shortage of parts, and this method renders the storage of numerous such components unnecessary. However, there would still be potential problems with raw material transportation, but at least this method would reduce the potential transport links being severed to one, from two.

There are a variety of methods a business might choose, which could improve efficiency.  The aim of the business when introducing changes to improve efficiency is to increase the productivity of factors of production, reduce costs and raise profits.  Increasingly, businesses are adopting company-wide approaches, which involve the whole business in improving efficiency.  

Characteristics of good performing companies

  • Launch new products quickly, correct problems after and then market the improved version.  Cutting lead times was also emphasised by certain managers.
  • Successful companies were those, which listened to consumers.  Customers tended to know what they would buy and firms should supply products, which customers want.
  • The generation of new ideas was a key factor for success.  All employees should be encouraged to try out new ideas, even if they didn’t always work.  
  • Top companies recognised the quality and potential of their workforce.  Given the opportunity, workers would solve their own problems.
  • Successful businesses stressed values such as, continuous innovation, good customer service and dependable quality.  Leading by example was also considered important for managers.
  • Diversification could weaken a company.  Expanding through the development of strengths would be more profitable than trying to do something completely different.
  • Organisation charts in leading companies tended to be flatter.  Flat structures and a simple chain of command are more effective than matrix structures.
  • Successful businesses tend to be more decentralised.

Peugeot are high on perfection it would seem. Trying to cut lead times and they always try and launch products as quickly as possible.  The sooner the products are on the market, the more profits they can make.

Peugeot know how valuable their workforce is to them, because they are what bring in the overall profits.  Keeping them happy is a big priority.  So if they come up with excellent ideas that can cut lead times, that employee will be rewarded with a £1000 bonus.  That’s the incentive for all employees to keep coming up with ideas, even if the don’t work.  Also Peugeot want their employees to become more independent, so if the supervisor isn’t there, the worker can make his own decision.

Join now!

It would also be good for the company to explore further incentives for production line workers to improve their work rate while maintaining the current quality of output; while they no doubt work hard, the possibility of rewards to a certain output would do no harm to production levels. That said, there would be additional costs for Peugeot, but on the other hand these would hopefully be offset by improvements made in productivity.

The hierarchical structure of Peugeot is pretty flat, which makes communication relatively easier than that of a structure with many levels e.g. matrix structures.

...

This is a preview of the whole essay