• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are the arguments for maximising economic growth stronger or weaker than those for restricting it?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are the arguments for maximising economic growth stronger or weaker than those for restricting it? Economic growth is sometimes referred to as the 'Holy Grail' of economic policy. All governments want to increase growth because economic growth means higher incomes, and higher incomes mean higher living standards. Governments would like as much growth as possible, but the trouble is that too much growth causes other problems. So the Chancellor's aim is as much growth as possible without inflation and balance of payments problems. Unemployment is a big problem for the economy. Not only is it a severe personal blow to those concerned, but it is also an economic waste. Not only are the unemployed not working, and therefore not contributing to the economy, but they will also be claiming benefits and costing the government money. To maximise economic growth, the governments aim should be to keep unemployment as low as possible. ...read more.

Middle

Health care is another factor that affects the quality of people's lives. If there is better health care, people tend to live longer, this increases living standards. As there are more people around, more people will be working in the medical profession, taking care of the shortage of nurses for example, also increasing living standards. There are however, some reasons for restricting economic growth. There will be an inequality of income. Growth of the economy rarely delivers its benefits evenly to everyone. It often rewards the strong, being the more 'well off' people, but gives little to the weak, the not so 'well off'. This will widen the income distribution in the economy. The push for increased output tends to put more and more pressure on the environment and the result will often be increased pollution. This may be in the form of water, soil or air pollution, but growth also creates significantly increased noise pollution. ...read more.

Conclusion

3. Promoting education and training - this should make the workforce more skilled and therefore more productive. 4. Promoting research and development - spending on research and development will help find new more efficient ways to produce and should lead to better and more varied products. 5. Promoting mobility - if the economy is to be as flexible as possible, people need to retrain where necessary and they need to move to where the jobs are. The government has to help encourage this. It could be observed from this information, that maximising economic growth undoubtedly seems more of a constructive way forward. However, from an environmentalist's point of view, restricting would seem the only way to go. The government, around at the moment, or future governments, aren't going to stop the drive for growth because that isn't the way they work. They will always be trying to increase the standard of life so that they can be seen to be trying, despite the constant climb of environmental pressure. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Retailing In India - A Government Policy Perspective

    State Obstacles Taxes levied on transportation of goods from State to State (such as octroi and entry tax) adversely impact the economic environment for export production. Such taxes impose both cost and time delays on movement of inputs used in production of export products as well as in transport of the latter to the ports.

  2. GDP and Growth

    to 1990 (5.72%). However, the problem is it caused high inflation, from 1987 (4.16%dRPI) to 1990 (9.44%dRPI), by the autumn of 1990, RPI inflation had gone up to 10.9%. The government had to raise the interest rate to slow down the economy, therefore the house prices fell and UK started to experience a recession between 1991 and 1992.

  1. Free essay

    From an economic perspective should my council do more to recycle a greater proportion ...

    In July it is expected to be over 50%. Municipal Waste Management 2007/08, England This pie chart shows how household waste is dealt with in England. 54.4% is put in landfill sites, 11.1 % is incinerated, and 34% is recycled while 0.4% is dealt with in other ways.

  2. Differences between the standards of living in Slovakia and The Hague

    Number of people working fulltime/part time Full Part 28 22 If the country has a higher part time working people, it means people spend less time at work and take care of their children or do other things. Although Part time jobs can have their positives, they have their negatives,

  1. The costs and benefits of economic growth.

    as a whole is growing - because the size of the "national cake" is expanding. Growth and investment Much capital investment is income or demand induced - so that when demand is running strongly, many businesses will be looking to go ahead with planned capital investment projects designed to boost

  2. Analysis of some fundamental arguments claimed by Albert Hirschman and Gunnar Myrdal

    Hirschman emphasises that economic growth is typically unbalanced and, that development planning is only effective when it concentrates its efforts on key industries with ample backward and forward linkages to other industries. In a much quoted observation, Hirschman noted that the sociology of successful economic development truly involves the calling

  1. Split Votes: A Nation Divided on the Marijuana/Drug Legalization Debate

    But because they do receive some of their funding from the government, the possibility is present. The Cato Institute was founded in 1977 and is a non-profit public policy research center (Cato). Unlike the Hudson Institute, Cato clearly states it will not take any government funds: "In order to maintain

  2. Scarcity and Unlimited Wants.

    * The transport system must be good enough to reach a large number of consumers (mass market) * Barter is the direct exchange of goods for other goods. Each worker creates only part of the finished goods, therefore the division of labour cannot be used in a barter society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work