Detailed GMP inspection Report OnShetland SeaFish (Hull) Ltd.

Authors Avatar

Foundation Degree (FdSc) in Food Manufacturing Management

Detailed GMP inspection Report

On

 Shetland SeaFish (Hull) Ltd

Module 2 – The Food Industry

NAME:Steve Norman

Introduction

Audit objectives

Why Audit?

The intentions of this Audit are as follows:

        Using a recognised GMP standard (UNIDO/BRC) assess and quantify the effectiveness of the current quality system that is in place.

        Recommend, upon review, strategies for improvement that can be made to meet, and potentially exceed, the minimum retail requirements.

  • Upon completion, allow the business to set attainable goals and objectives in order to drive the business forward. This is in an efficiency, production and legal capacity.

Company Profile

Shetland SeaFish (Hull) limited started trading in 1922 as a specialist manufacturer of frozen fish products.  The company employs 50-60 staff on site and has a total of 80-100 employees working throughout the group. The group has three factories. The other two are involved in primary processing and fish farming in the Shetland isles. The company supplies supermarkets, discounters, fish wholesalers, frozen food distributors and food service companies.  The main market is the UK but the company also has a small export trade.  Shetland SeaFish (Hull) limited has implemented a tightly controlled system of operational procedures including a fully documented HACCP system and quality manual.  

Business Environment

The food industry is one under pressure. The fishing industry in particular is an area with its own particular problems which have a direct impact on this company as fish is its primary raw material.

Over the past few years, environmental concern over diminishing fish stocks has contributed to increased governmental interdiction to manage fishing quotas. Although this may be the case for the national fishing industry, the world wide catch (up until recently) has been on a steady rise.  This company sources raw material from worldwide locals (Particularly the Asiatic areas such as China and Scandinavian Seas) so the impact has been minimal.

The way in which the company sources fish may change in the future, as internet auctions are on the increase, and this makes the market more of a volatile entity as prices can fluctuate as events affect fishing procurement.

The other main problem with the food industry is the strength of the major multiples over the manufacturers. The major supermarkets to whom most food manufacturers supply, aim to maintain a constant gross profit margin which is typically quite large. To reflect this, the multiples like to pass down on-costs to the suppliers. Offers such as ‘buy one, get one free’ are fuelled by the manufacturer, and come straight from their bottom line. By running a “BOGOF” offer, it is affectively selling the product at half the unit price for the duration of the offer.

 

One supermarket that this company has dealt with also deducts (on their own accord) a set price to go towards advertising and marketing. For example, a deduction of £10,000 might be deducted from an invoice to them for product, with the reasoning being that even if that amount is not being used to directly promote that particular product, just by advertising the stores in general, the increased amount of customers flowing through the store, should they say, increase sales to the company’s product. This deduction from the invoice is imposed by the supermarket, and because you do not know how often they are going to do this, it makes costing for business more difficult.  

Combine this with the fact that at every price review by the supermarket buyer’s, they demand higher quality products, for a reduction in unit price, depresses margins lower than ever.

 

The margin depression brings with it a set of problems. Because a company has to reduce its costs to meet the price points per units, so as to maintain the business with the supermarket, it makes it for a business to remain as profitable as what it would like to be.

A smaller margin means that a company does not have the same amount of free capital available to it to make necessary re-investments which would help to procure more sales and increase throughput. In section four of the overview, a specific study of this is discussed in relation to an OEE study on one of the factories lines.

There are several technological resolutions available which if purchased would go a long way to increase productivity. Unfortunately there are several financial constraints which place barriers to the procurement of these technological improvements.  A brief discussion of ‘Chicken and Egg’ barriers is briefly explained in section four of the overview.

The problem lies in the fact that if a new piece of equipment is needed to continue, or to improve production, then the company does not have enough liquid capital available to be able to purchase it outright. This means that the company would have to investigate borrowing facilities.

The problem with this is that the company would like to have a secured amount of business from one of, or a combination of customers, in order to take on the risk of borrowing large amounts of money. The reason for this is that a company has to account for a payback period into their costing to cover borrowing and interest as well as machine depreciation.

With shortened product placement tenures, the guarantee of continued business for this period is not there, inhibiting the business from wanting to take a risk of this magnitude. Eventually a company has to ‘bite the bullet’ and take a risk in order to increase turnover and throughput.

Smaller margins also mean that there may not be enough of an increase in net profits to cover staff requirements. Each year there is a general staff appraisal to discuss the terms of wages and conditions. If the company is reduced in its profit capacity, then this trend is often relayed onto the workforce.

f the company has diminished available finances then money is not possible to give staffs the annual increase in wages or to be able to invest in communal facilities.

This has a knock on effect on staff morale and motivation if the annual increase is postponed or if it has to be cancelled. It manifests itself in some individuals in a revenge motivation mentality. As the individuals feel aggrieved because the company cannon comply with what the workers feel is a basic right, then they may wish to ‘get back’ at the company.

At best this may just be by reducing their amount and quality of work, therefore their loyalty is affected. At worst, it could be resignation, dissention or even some form of industrial sabotage.

Without the increase in wages rates it also lessens the difference between that and what the government sets as the national minimum wage. This poses a problem in relation to retaining, and gaining new employees.

At one point, working in a factory used to attract a premium, but over time that has decreased to the point to where wage levels between shop workers and factory workers are almost the same.

With the current work ethos among new employees (particularly young people) the dilemma of where would ‘I’ like to work arises. Either a (usually) smelly, shift work system, hard work inducing factory, or a shop, where they can go straight out from without having to go home for a shower and change, is less hard work and usually has a set nine until five work pattern. For the same, or similar, wage, most people appear to want to work in a shop.

This displays a distinct shift from employment trends from primary or secondary employment to a majority of employment in the tertiary, or services, sector.

 

If a company has a high turn-over of staff, then generally the quality of staffs decreases. This may then affect production output and efficiencies.

One way that this can be combated is though an increase in staff training. This not only acts to both increase staff quality, but it also helps to improve the individuals’ job satisfaction. This is through increased competency, increased knowledge (i.e. making an individual more multi-skilled) and the feeling that they are not in a ‘dead-end’ job.

In the industry sector to which this company falls, there is an increased amount of governmental grants available for staff training programmes.

Within this factory, all of the employees of first tier level have all been through NVQ level 2 training in Food hygiene and handling. Production supervisors have received additional training to NVQ level three in this area. There is also a range of other courses that are being studied that are part funded, or reimbursed by, governmental policies.

         

It is clear that there are some relatively easy ways to increase the efficiency and line throughputs of production. Unfortunately limiting factors come into play to inhibit potential growth as long as margins are squeezed smaller and smaller.

This is a self perpetuating cycle. If allowed to make a little bit more profit then this can be channelled back into the business to increase production efficiency and overall turnover making the business more successful.

Legal Issues

There is a complex mine field of legislation that comes into play when dealing with a food unit operation. There is a whole plethora of acts and regulations which help to control the food industry which helps to protect the consumer from dubious practices and ensure that the final product that is consumed is of the expected substance, nature and quality demanded.

There are several levels of legislation:

  • Acts, which are statutes passed down by parliament.
  • Regulations – which are made under specific acts
  • E.C. directives – which are passed down from the E.E.C.

The Food safety enforcement officers have various enforcement powers which enable them to ensure that all of the legislation is correctly adhered to. These can be servicing notices, sampling and seizing foodstuffs, and also to instigate criminal proceedings if an offence is made.

The main legislation affecting this business are to be listed as following;

Food Safety Act, 1990

This act is in relation to the sale of food for human consumption and is applicable to all food premises.

This act makes it an offence to:

  • Render food injurious to health
  • Sale or possession of food injurious to health, or that is unfit for, or is contaminated.
  • Sale of food that is not of the correct nature, substance and quality demanded by the consumer.
  • Give any false or misleading descriptions.

The Food Premises (Registration) Regulations, 1991 (SI No. 2825) amended 1997

This regulation requires all food premises to register with the local, or port authority, in the area that they are situated. Every registration authority must keep a register, which can be accessed by the public for inspection.

Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulation, 1995 (SI. No. 1763)

This act provides general requirements for all food handlers and premises (with specific requirements for preparation areas, moveable and temp. premises, transport, equipment and the like) to be kept clean, facilitate cleaning, and prevent the accumulation of dirt. It also specifies a requirement for all food premises to identify all steps in the business that is critical to food safety, and to minimise these risks.

The Food Safety (Temperature Controls) Regulations, 1995 (SI. No. 2200) 

This determines any matter involving a risk to food safety, in relation to the nature of the food, manner in which it is handled and packed, and processes and conditions under which it has been displayed or stored. No person should keep food that is likely to support the growth of pathogenic bacteria or the accumulation of their toxins.

Products of Animal Origin (Import and Export) Regulations, 1996

These regulations govern the origins of animal foodstuffs from countries outside the EEC. Since 1993, foodstuffs imported from other members of the EEC are not liable for inspection due to the open border policy, but they are still subject to the Food Safety Act 1990.

Food Labelling Regulations 1996 (SI. No. 1499)

These require most foodstuffs that are to be sold for human consumption be labelled with:

  • The name of the food.
  • List of ingredients (Quantifying ingredients mentioned in the name of the food).
  • Best before dates, which indicate minimum durability or perish ability of the food in relation to microbial or product degradation beyond being fit for human consumption.
  • Any specific storage conditions required.
  • Name and address of the manufacturer
Join now!

The Quick-Frozen Foodstuffs Regulations, 1990 (SI. No. 2615) amended 1994

Food that has undergone quick-freezing (i.e. whereby the zone of maximum crystallization as rapidly as possible) should be labelled as such. It must be suitably packaged so as to protect it from microbial and other contamination and also to protect from de-hydration.

Must be labelled with:

  • BBE
  • Storage requirements including temps.
  • Batch reference
  • A clear message not to refreeze after defrosting.

There are also some specific legislation relating to food poisoning:

Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1994

The Public Health (Infectious Diseases) Regulations, 1988 ...

This is a preview of the whole essay