• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The term Human Resource Management (HRM) is full of ambiguities. Legge (1995) contrasts the 'hard' and 'soft' schools of HRM and the 'rhetoric' and reality of the phenomena.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The term Human Resource Management (HRM) is full of ambiguities. Legge (1995) contrasts the 'hard' and 'soft' schools of HRM and the 'rhetoric' and reality of the phenomena. HRM was identified in the United States during the 1950's but wider recognition especially in the United Kingdom did not arrive until the mid 1980's. The 1980's saw the first British books written on the concepts of Human Resource Management, which created much scepticism about the new ways in which to organise labour forces. Academics such as Beardwell, Holden, Legge and Beaumont who introduced many supporting theories during the 1990's, demonstrated that HRM wasn't just a passing phase, but a new concept of how employees think and operate in the work place. Monk 1994 described HRM as a 'slippery concept that means different things to different people'. Guest 1987 referred to HRM as ' being people orientated throughout with an ethic of respect for the individual, maximising individual talent, well developed policies and practices, genuine consultation involvement, and clear challenging goals with feedback'. It could be argued that Guest's model does nothing to differentiate HRM from personnel, which was later supported by Legge 1989. Legge commented that 'successful companies guide and shape their company's culture to fir their strategy.' ...read more.

Middle

While both hard and soft models of HRM provide weight to linking strategy to the importance of people, different meanings are given to each and different assumptions made concerning human nature. Noon suggested that the dichotomy of hard and soft HRM manifests itself as a gap between rhetoric and reality (Noon 1994).Blyton and Turnbull (1994, p4) have quoted Skinner who addresses HRM as nothing more than good intentions and whistling in the dark'. This vision of HRM operating as a powerless theoretical model is supported by Argyris 1998. Could HRM rhetoric have outstripped the reality? (Blyton and Turnbull 1994). Theorists such as Truss et al 1997 found no pure examples of soft or hard HRM in rhetoric or reality and that the rhetoric adopted by many organisations appeared to abide by softer approaches, the reality experienced by employees as similar to the hard model. A study by Sewell and Wilkinson contrasted the rhetoric of employee and employer commitment with the reality of workers in a Japanese company in the UK, which concluded the close similarity of Japanese style to that of the hard versions of HRM. Womak et al 1990 brought particular attention to the lean production methods of Toyota who were functioning as a solely profit making and efficiency dominated organisation. ...read more.

Conclusion

Gill 1999 concluded to say that this has supported that HRM has facilitated the intensification of work and commodification of labour that re asserts management authority. Interestingly not all rhetoric has been identified as hard, as some organisations consistently invest in employee training and involvement, however this was often dependent on the performance of the bottom line. Organisations who introduced employee empowerment in attempts to increase overall production often failed to consider the actual employment needs of the individual. This becomes a fundamental failure of HRM theory itself, as it can no longer deliver maximum potential from employees to achieve business strategic goals. The work of Kane et al 1999 supported that of Gill 1999 in an attempt to identify the poor alignment of HRM with strategy, or the hidden agendas of organisations wishing to increase managerial control. This brings more weight to the work of Legge (1995 p.40) 'the contradictions embedded in HRM that have facilitated the development of a rhetoric that may simultaneously render strategic action problematic'. HRM theory has clearly suffered from constant undermining and non-commitment at senior management level, with the use of hard and soft HRM rhetoric only concealing the overall problem. An environment of disbelief and cynics has resulted in the creation of an environment that only fuels this air of distrust (Gill 1999). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE People in Business section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE People in Business essays

  1. The relationship between management theory and practice.

    responding to change in its external and internal environment, in order to meet the competing demands of all its various stakeholders - customers, suppliers, employees and shareholders etc. Over the past thirty years the impact of the behavioral sciences on the study of people at work has led to the ascendancy of organization theory over purely management theory.

  2. Managing Human Resources in Marks & Spencer.

    Fig 1.4 they can see if they are able to plan to recruit. By looking at the education level of people Marks & Spencer, can see weather they are able to plan to employ people with the skills. Once Marks & Spencer has decided on the number and type of employees it needs in future.

  1. Human Resource Planning.

    with long service to remain with Boots, thus linking the leaving rate with the length of service. Number of staff leaving with More than 1 year's service Stability = . * 100 Index Number employed 1 year ago Knowing about the existing labour force enables Boots to make the most of the skills and potential already within the organisation.

  2. A REPORT INTO HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AT SAINSBURY'S

    The action part of the plan seeks to balance labour with labour requirements. The main reasons for Human Resource Planning are: * It encourages employers to develop clear links between their business plans and their HR plans so that they can integrate the two more effectively.

  1. Investigate about the important roles that management plays in achieving my chosen organisation aims ...

    tested about that to see if they have retained something and to see if more training is needed. Increased training and awareness around health and safety has been driven in the UK/ROI Region by the new Health and Safety Manager.

  2. To examine whether human resource management works well in theory but not in practice, ...

    Such process may lead to long-run argument and waste of time. Though PBR can supposedly eliminate the age-old problem of buying worker's time but not their effort, still a new problem emerges, for the system encourages speed, not quality (Druker, 2000:115).

  1. Banquets Management

    Some points to be kept in mind while organizing: - 1. MENU PLANNING Menu planning is very important to banqueting. The menu must be easy to cook, dish-up. Keep well hot and serve. This might well impose a limitation of choice, which can prove difficult, because guests at a special function always anticipate being served with the best of everything.

  2. The Potential for Conflict in Tesco's Human Resource Management

    Human resource planning may plan expansionial growth of the business that will increase the work of recruitment and selection, without reference to recruitment and selection who may not have the staff in order to complete the planned expansion. Conflict may arise between performance management and training may disagree on training

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work