• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"To fix or not to fix?"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"To fix or not to fix?" is a long-standing question in macroeconomics. The issue that sounds deceptively simple has led some countries to face dire consequences by virtue of making a bad choice. The choice of exchange rate regime involves considerations that extend beyond merely the stability of currency prices. This paper juxtaposes the relative merits and demerits of both the regimes and by critically evaluating them leads to the conclusion that no one regime is better than the other. The optimal choice of the regime is relative, depending on various underlying conditions of the economy. It has been observed in the past that attempts to defend a fixed exchange rate has translated into extremely costly financial crises e.g. 11 percent fall in Thai GDP in 1998, the Korean crisis in 1997, and Russian crisis in 1998 (Williamson, 2004). The policy measure that governments of overvalued currency resort to is devaluation, but the gains from devaluation take time to materialize while the negative effects set in immediately1 and this often results in a recession. On the other side, there are similar costs of defending an undervalued exchange rate which accrue in the form of inflationary pressures. ...read more.

Middle

Indeed the rationale of a fixed exchange rate system essentially precludes the conduct of an independent monetary policy. The fixed exchange rate regime answers to this situation is based on the premise of "importing credibility", which it achieves by to this committing themselves overtly to imitate the monetary policy of the more competent central banks. But the logic of the argument is far from convincing are weak because it irrationally places a greater confidence in (indirect) exchange rate targeting (Kenen, 2000). Furthermore one rather political argument against the fixed exchange rate regime is that it would mean the domestic economy would be loosing a great deal of democracy as foreigners (the anchor) would be controlling our money. Moreover, in fixed rate regimes, monetary policy must be subordinated by fiscal policy in order to maintain the exchange rate fixed, this effectively ties the hands of the authorities. (Caramazza and Aziz, 1998) Addressing the same task of economic stimulation via fiscal policy would result in government increasing its budget deficit. The associated upward pressure on interest rates induces an appreciation of the dollar, which in turn discourages exports, encourages imports, and reduces net capital inflow. ...read more.

Conclusion

A conventional view is that a fixed exchange rate has the advantage of sharply reducing or eliminating exchange rate volatility, this element of certainty will (relatively) reduce transaction costs associated with hedging currency risk. It is also worth mentioning some countries which have less developed financial sectors are ill-equipped with tools to hedge such risks. This certainty coupled with reduced transaction costs will in turn bolster trade across borders. The flip side of this certainty means inviting speculative attacks (Napolitano and Canale, 2002) as was the case with sterling in autumn 1992, the market perceived it to be overvalued and an impending devaluation was expected. .Under Fixed exchange rate regimes where interest rates are higher than the anchor country, there is an incentive to borrow unhedged in the anchor currency, pressurizing local currency to loose value. To withstand such pressures under fixed exchange rate regimes, authorities impose capital controls. All in all, a country cannot maintain a fixed exchange rate, open capital market, and monetary policy independence at the same time. Based on the already established arguments and we acknowledge that there is no universally "optimal" regime. Both the regimes have their strengths and weaknesses and the best regime is the one that minimizes the fluctuation in output and prices, moreover one that stabilizes macroeconomic performance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. The Nature of Macroeconomics

    irregularity of innovation and accelerator effect o determinants = expected profitability and cost of capital * Governments Spending o 20-25% of GDP, on federal level o provides public services & goods o revenues raised by taxation o macroeconomic management through either fiscal or monetary policies o spending determines by social

  2. Retailing In India - A Government Policy Perspective

    This tends to complicate sourcing. In addition, customers perceive modern formats as more expensive than the traditional, transition formats, especially in food retailing. 8. Archaic laws A bulk of the laws governing retailing in India are very archaic and were framed decades earlier when organized retailing was unheard of in this industry.

  1. What might cause an appreciation of a floating exchange rate? Discuss whether an appreciation ...

    Depending on the price elasticity demand for exports and imports, an appreciation of the Exchange rate will see a widening of the trade deficit. In the short run, as imports and exports are usually price inelastic, the inflow of money will cause the balance of payments to improve.

  2. An Empirical Investigation into the Causes and Effects of Liquidity in Emerging

    This can lead to massive sell-offs in the high-yield market during times of economic stress. Interest rate risk will affect prices on both types of fixed-income security, as shown above, in the sensitivity of emerging market bonds to changes in international market conditions.

  1. Exchange rate.

    then the value of the pound in terms of dollars will rise and the value of the dollar in terms of pounds will fall. If the UK imports more than it exports then the value of the pound will fall.

  2. Liberalization: where it has lead us and where it is headed

    I came up with three rather simple points. India has one great strength, one great weakness, and one great hope. Its great strength is its people; its great weakness is its government; its great hope is the Internet. First, India's great strength is its people. India has one billion of them, which is a number that is almost beyond the ability of our minds to conceive.

  1. Supply side policy.

    Export potential should be boosted and both price and non-price factors would become important in how UK firms traded * Making labour more flexible via trade union reform, or a greater emphasis on training and educational opportunities, or improving geographical and occupational mobility * Reform of direct taxation and the switch to indirect forms.

  2. The Famous Grouse - company profile and exports

    This dynamic growth has boosted real incomes (but left behind many at the bottom of the ladder), broadened and deepened the technological capabilities of the industrial sector, and contained inflationary pressures. Per capita income has been rising and is now 80% of the level of the four largest EU economies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work