• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"To fix or not to fix?"

Extracts from this document...


"To fix or not to fix?" is a long-standing question in macroeconomics. The issue that sounds deceptively simple has led some countries to face dire consequences by virtue of making a bad choice. The choice of exchange rate regime involves considerations that extend beyond merely the stability of currency prices. This paper juxtaposes the relative merits and demerits of both the regimes and by critically evaluating them leads to the conclusion that no one regime is better than the other. The optimal choice of the regime is relative, depending on various underlying conditions of the economy. It has been observed in the past that attempts to defend a fixed exchange rate has translated into extremely costly financial crises e.g. 11 percent fall in Thai GDP in 1998, the Korean crisis in 1997, and Russian crisis in 1998 (Williamson, 2004). The policy measure that governments of overvalued currency resort to is devaluation, but the gains from devaluation take time to materialize while the negative effects set in immediately1 and this often results in a recession. On the other side, there are similar costs of defending an undervalued exchange rate which accrue in the form of inflationary pressures. ...read more.


Indeed the rationale of a fixed exchange rate system essentially precludes the conduct of an independent monetary policy. The fixed exchange rate regime answers to this situation is based on the premise of "importing credibility", which it achieves by to this committing themselves overtly to imitate the monetary policy of the more competent central banks. But the logic of the argument is far from convincing are weak because it irrationally places a greater confidence in (indirect) exchange rate targeting (Kenen, 2000). Furthermore one rather political argument against the fixed exchange rate regime is that it would mean the domestic economy would be loosing a great deal of democracy as foreigners (the anchor) would be controlling our money. Moreover, in fixed rate regimes, monetary policy must be subordinated by fiscal policy in order to maintain the exchange rate fixed, this effectively ties the hands of the authorities. (Caramazza and Aziz, 1998) Addressing the same task of economic stimulation via fiscal policy would result in government increasing its budget deficit. The associated upward pressure on interest rates induces an appreciation of the dollar, which in turn discourages exports, encourages imports, and reduces net capital inflow. ...read more.


A conventional view is that a fixed exchange rate has the advantage of sharply reducing or eliminating exchange rate volatility, this element of certainty will (relatively) reduce transaction costs associated with hedging currency risk. It is also worth mentioning some countries which have less developed financial sectors are ill-equipped with tools to hedge such risks. This certainty coupled with reduced transaction costs will in turn bolster trade across borders. The flip side of this certainty means inviting speculative attacks (Napolitano and Canale, 2002) as was the case with sterling in autumn 1992, the market perceived it to be overvalued and an impending devaluation was expected. .Under Fixed exchange rate regimes where interest rates are higher than the anchor country, there is an incentive to borrow unhedged in the anchor currency, pressurizing local currency to loose value. To withstand such pressures under fixed exchange rate regimes, authorities impose capital controls. All in all, a country cannot maintain a fixed exchange rate, open capital market, and monetary policy independence at the same time. Based on the already established arguments and we acknowledge that there is no universally "optimal" regime. Both the regimes have their strengths and weaknesses and the best regime is the one that minimizes the fluctuation in output and prices, moreover one that stabilizes macroeconomic performance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. What might cause an appreciation of a floating exchange rate? Discuss whether an appreciation ...

    This could be bad for the country in the long run as consumers may get dependent on imported goods, local production may go down and then when the exchange rate falls there might be a fall in living standards. Increase in the relative prices of imports will cause a fall in the profitability of exporting overseas.

  2. The Nature of Macroeconomics

    * Both consumption and saving are directly related * Y = C + S * Y > C = saving is +ve * Y < C = savings is -ve * Y = C = saving is 0 * Y = 0 = consumption is exactly balanced by dissaving Components

  1. The Quest for Optimal Asset Allocation Strategies in Integrating Europe.

    Using an unrestricted model without this strong assumption, they find that country factors are more important in explaining stock return. However, they (Brooks & Del Negro (2002b)) report that Europe (unlike other regions in the world) is the only region where the relative and absolute importance of the industry effect

  2. The Ohio Pilot Scholarship Program

    how a place-bound identity is elaborated in the context of the neighbourhood and expressed in its symbolic locale." In this case, we have a sense of place linked, rather than de-linked, to locality. After a review of the ever-burgeoning literature on the concept of place, Corcoran explores what city residents say (primarily in the form of complaint)

  1. Supply side policy.

    Commitment to free trade The UK government has signed up to trade agreements brokered by the World Trade Organization. Trade creates competition and should be a catalyst for improvements in cost and lower prices for consumers. The United Kingdom is also a full-paid up member of the European Single Market

  2. An Empirical Investigation into the Causes and Effects of Liquidity in Emerging

    Three different types of investors are therefore apparent. * Firstly, there are long-term research based, portfolio investors who are seeking capital appreciation, based on steady or improving fundamental conditions. * Secondly, there are trading oriented investors that take advantage of liquidity cycles, country specific events, in the case of emerging

  1. The Famous Grouse - company profile and exports

    GDP - real growth rate: 3.1% (2004 est.) GDP - per capita: purchasing power parity - $37,800 (2004 est.) GDP - composition by sector: agriculture: 1.4% industry: 26.2% services: 72.5% (2004 est.) Investment (gross fixed): 15.2% of GDP (2004 est.)

  2. Debt Sustainability and the Exchange Rate: The Case of Turkey

    Public Sector, 17% to Foreign Markets, 7% to International Institutions and 12% to the IMF. Looking at the domestic debt stock alone, of the $126 billion, 48.1% of the debt is to the public sector and 51.9% is to the market.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work