• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"To fix or not to fix?"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"To fix or not to fix?" is a long-standing question in macroeconomics. The issue that sounds deceptively simple has led some countries to face dire consequences by virtue of making a bad choice. The choice of exchange rate regime involves considerations that extend beyond merely the stability of currency prices. This paper juxtaposes the relative merits and demerits of both the regimes and by critically evaluating them leads to the conclusion that no one regime is better than the other. The optimal choice of the regime is relative, depending on various underlying conditions of the economy. It has been observed in the past that attempts to defend a fixed exchange rate has translated into extremely costly financial crises e.g. 11 percent fall in Thai GDP in 1998, the Korean crisis in 1997, and Russian crisis in 1998 (Williamson, 2004). The policy measure that governments of overvalued currency resort to is devaluation, but the gains from devaluation take time to materialize while the negative effects set in immediately1 and this often results in a recession. On the other side, there are similar costs of defending an undervalued exchange rate which accrue in the form of inflationary pressures. ...read more.

Middle

Indeed the rationale of a fixed exchange rate system essentially precludes the conduct of an independent monetary policy. The fixed exchange rate regime answers to this situation is based on the premise of "importing credibility", which it achieves by to this committing themselves overtly to imitate the monetary policy of the more competent central banks. But the logic of the argument is far from convincing are weak because it irrationally places a greater confidence in (indirect) exchange rate targeting (Kenen, 2000). Furthermore one rather political argument against the fixed exchange rate regime is that it would mean the domestic economy would be loosing a great deal of democracy as foreigners (the anchor) would be controlling our money. Moreover, in fixed rate regimes, monetary policy must be subordinated by fiscal policy in order to maintain the exchange rate fixed, this effectively ties the hands of the authorities. (Caramazza and Aziz, 1998) Addressing the same task of economic stimulation via fiscal policy would result in government increasing its budget deficit. The associated upward pressure on interest rates induces an appreciation of the dollar, which in turn discourages exports, encourages imports, and reduces net capital inflow. ...read more.

Conclusion

A conventional view is that a fixed exchange rate has the advantage of sharply reducing or eliminating exchange rate volatility, this element of certainty will (relatively) reduce transaction costs associated with hedging currency risk. It is also worth mentioning some countries which have less developed financial sectors are ill-equipped with tools to hedge such risks. This certainty coupled with reduced transaction costs will in turn bolster trade across borders. The flip side of this certainty means inviting speculative attacks (Napolitano and Canale, 2002) as was the case with sterling in autumn 1992, the market perceived it to be overvalued and an impending devaluation was expected. .Under Fixed exchange rate regimes where interest rates are higher than the anchor country, there is an incentive to borrow unhedged in the anchor currency, pressurizing local currency to loose value. To withstand such pressures under fixed exchange rate regimes, authorities impose capital controls. All in all, a country cannot maintain a fixed exchange rate, open capital market, and monetary policy independence at the same time. Based on the already established arguments and we acknowledge that there is no universally "optimal" regime. Both the regimes have their strengths and weaknesses and the best regime is the one that minimizes the fluctuation in output and prices, moreover one that stabilizes macroeconomic performance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. What might cause an appreciation of a floating exchange rate? Discuss whether an appreciation ...

    Growth of exports is likely to slowdown. A loss of market share may occur and this loss of export market share may be difficult to recover. When the prices of exports rise from P1 to P2 quantity demanded will fall less than proportionately because of price elasticity from Q1 to Q2.

  2. The Nature of Macroeconomics

    * Both consumption and saving are directly related * Y = C + S * Y > C = saving is +ve * Y < C = savings is -ve * Y = C = saving is 0 * Y = 0 = consumption is exactly balanced by dissaving Components

  1. An Empirical Investigation into the Causes and Effects of Liquidity in Emerging

    This was highlighted in the Latin American capital flight,10 when sustained real appreciation of the exchange rate of the currencies played a major role in over borrowing. This will reduce liquidity in the long run, as fewer investors will want to hold Latin American debt and the bid-ask spread will widen, because of the increased liquidity premium.

  2. The Ohio Pilot Scholarship Program

    As Belanger said about Montreal, such changes raise for examination the specific ways the common tension between a city's commitment to its own sense of uniqueness as a particular place (as expressed by appeals to its particular history, architecture, geography, population, street life, etc.)

  1. The Quest for Optimal Asset Allocation Strategies in Integrating Europe.

    Segmentation may also be caused by various restrictions which limit ownership of foreign assets, such as currency matching rules or general restrictions with respect to weights placed on foreign assets affecting pension funds and life insurance companies. Many different researchers have investigated the evolution of correlations among sector and country portfolios over time.

  2. Mexico&amp;amp;#146;s Financial Crisis.

    income did not increase but may have decreased slightly even. This was followed by pressure on the balance of payment cycle, where exports grew less than the rate of increase in imports. This would prove to worsen current account balances.

  1. Supply side policy.

    The result has been an increase in the flexibility of the labour market, a decrease in strike action in virtually every industry and (in the long term) a significant improvement in industrial relations in the United Kingdom. Increased Spending on Education and Training Economists disagree about the scale of the

  2. What is macroeconomics?

    competitiveness of firms Pg 19, 1.8 Factors affecting AE Keynesian theory and the level of economic activity Pg 20, 1.9 The consumption function * Y = C + S * Marginal propensity to consume (MPC) = ? C / ?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work