• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A comparison between The Crucible and our production of an extract from Pygmalion

Extracts from this document...


A comparison between The Crucible and our production of an extract from Pygmalion We performed an extract from the play Pygmalion by Bernard Shaw, which is about a 'draggle tailed guttersnipe' of a woman, Eliza, who receives elocution lessons from a professor, Mr. Higgins, and metamorphoses into a Lady; they consequently fall in love. It is set in the late nineteenth century, during the Victorian era, in London. We also read The Crucible, a play by Arthur Miller, about a town hysterically overcome by accusations of witchcraft, set in Salem on the East coast of America in the late seventeenth century. One of the major differences between the two plays is the period in which they are set (Pygmalion is set in the early twentieth century, The Crucible in the Seventeenth). The different periods in which the plays are set mean that the characters have different beliefs and traditions in accordance to the times. ...read more.


It is a serious drama which will continue to have social and political resonances in any era. The two plays therefore differ greatly in terms of genre. Miller's diction is formal and concise; the dialogue of The Crucible has a quality that could not easily be achieved in a naturalistic play of the present time. The characters are given a certain dignity and distance by quaint turns of phrase and peculiarities of grammar. The use of Mister as a form of address and 'Goody' as a title suggests a relationship strangely remote; and such phrases such as 'Cain were an upright man', 'there be no road between', 'I am thirty-three time in court in my life', a dialect used by judge as well as peasant, draw attention to another age and environment than ours. For people whose reading material was confined to the bible, it seems natural that their language should be dense in metaphor. ...read more.


Pearce and the character of Elizabeth Proctor in The Crucible. Goody Proctor piously forgives her husband John for his adultery; she is aware of his indiscretions but chooses to put it behind her. This is done with great dignity not unlike the unfaltering stoicism Mrs. Pearce exhibits. They both appear to display religious reservedness and Christian charity, shown by Goody Proctor's forgiveness of her husband, and by Mrs. Pearce's softening when becoming aware of Eliza's family situation along with their general attitudes. Mrs. Pearce is a woman in her late fifties, whereas Elizabeth is a mother of young children, and is aged around thirty or so; there is a wide age gap between the two characters. In conclusion, The Crucible and Pygmalion are both very realistic plays, but with different genres; the characters exhibit similar repressed morals and attitudes towards women, although The Crucible, owing to the much earlier time period in which it is set, takes these to extremes. Definite similarities are apparent between the character of Mrs Pearce and that of Elizabeth Proctor, despite the two hundred year gap between the conceptions of their characters. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. The crucible.

    Three? Four? How many?" She and the other girls give the names of innocent people who had nothing to do with witchcraft leaving the act with a dramatic hysterical close as all the girls try to cleanse themselves of the confrontation with Beelzebub hinting at the future prospects of the play.

  2. The Crucible.

    Salem, in 1692 was a theocracy, and a Puritan society. Puritanism, a strict form of Protestantism has a strict ideology featuring morality, self-discipline and introspection and adherence to religion and G-d. However, Miller utilises irony to problematise this religious extremism and to reveal the corruption evident in Puritan society.

  1. The Crucible - summary.

    Hale confronts Tituba. He says that if she loves these children she must let God's light shine on her. Hale asks if the Devil comes to her with anybody else. Tituba admits that the devil has come to her, and that the devil promises to return her to Barbados and shows how he

  2. Essay on 'The Crucible'

    She blames lies on other to save herself, she plays innocent and acts na�ve when in reality she is the cause of the disputes. She is evil and spiteful, cares for nobody but herself - she is simply selfish. Mary Warren, one of the weak and afraid characters, who can be moulded through threatening, as she is easily intimidated.

  1. The Crucible

    to read about and curious to find out what was going to happen next. Stage direction enabled us to visualise what was going on, on the stage. As it amplified the scenes and tension was added because the bigger and better the stage direction meant the scene was more detailed.

  2. The crucible

    The audience would be silent to hear what they are saying in order to understand how the relationship between the two characters is like in this scene. Seven months have passed since the affair and Abigail's feelings are not vanished from her heart towards Proctor, she wants to strengthen her

  1. A Comparison of the Performance of 'Confusions' by Alan Ayckbourn

    "A Talk in the Park" was set in the present day. This is because that the writer believed that the themes were relevant to any era. He was commenting on people, and the characteristics of the people he writes about don't change over time.

  2. The Crucible - review

    The audience want to know what is going on behind the wall, this builds tension in the audience because anything could be happening. The opening argument in act 3 sets the trial up to be noisy and confused because when Giles comes in and starts shouting, this "winds" the townspeople in the court up and builds tension.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work