• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A comparison between 'The Son's Veto' by Thomas Hardy and 'To Kill a Mockingbird' by Harper Lee

Extracts from this document...


A comparison between 'The Son's Veto' by Thomas Hardy and 'To Kill a Mockingbird' by Harper Lee I am going to be comparing the novel 'To Kill a Mockingbird' and 'The Son's Veto'. After reading these I noticed several things. They are linked by the moral of the story and by the differences. 'To Kill a Mockingbird' is set in the 1930's. Its main theme is the prejudice and discrimination in which Scout and Jem are brought up. After the civil war in America in 1867 black slavery was abolished, and although by law prejudice was unacceptable, this was not the case within modern society. People still saw Blacks as inferior, even those who may be better off than some whites. In 'To Kill a Mockingbird' this situation is presented to us by a court case in which a black man is accused of raping a white woman. Even though it is obvious that he is innocent, he is found guilty due to the way blacks are seen. As white's were still in power, they were seen as the superior race, people had the idea that coloured people were less intelligent and bad people. Blacks were denied equal opportunities, despite the laws and were therefore unable to reach their full potential, thus giving whites justification for their prejudice. ...read more.


It is written in third person narrative, and Sophy is the main character. The message of this story is not as clear, although we see how women are treated as belongings who have no right to make decisions and have no feelings. 'It will degrade me in the eyes of all the gentlemen in England,' her son, Randolph, replied when Sophy asked his permission to marry Sam. We are given Randolph in this story to show the prejudiced views on the lower class. It is similar to 'To Kill a Mockingbird' in the way that prejudice was an accepted way of life and it is irrelevant how happy a person is, being etiquette is paramount in society. Although this message is not based on Thomas Hardy, the fact that he managed to move social classes is not dissimilar to Sophy. The language in 'To Kill a Mockingbird' is a mixture of Standard English, American and Childish dialect. We can speculate that the Standard English is meant to be believed by the reader, as these present the facts of Maycomb. The narration is always Standard English and in first person narrative. Scout uses very adult terminology; this could be because Harper Lee may be looking back on similar events in her life, and making sense of the thoughts she ad at the time. ...read more.


They don't do anything for the community and send their children to the first day of school each year but nothing more. But because they are white they still have a higher status than the Robinson's and for this reason win the trial. Even though it is obvious he is innocent and it is suspected that Mr Ewell may have committed the crime himself because he disliked the relationship between Tom and his daughter. This emphasises how prejudiced the community is. I think that Harper Lee wrote this book not only to show the reader the past and how society worked, but also to teach us lessons for modern life. Through the book we discover the hurt and unfairness of inequality, and therefore think more carefully about out future actions. Gossip also still exists today, probably more than ever with chat shows, magazines and tabloid newspapers joining in. I think it is a huge lesson to us all. In conclusion I think that both books are not just for enjoyment, but also to make us think more carefully about others and our actions. I have learned that before I judge anyone I should get to know him or her. 'To Kill a Mockingbird' was easier to read, but because 'The Son's Veto' is written in an older language it seems of a higher standard. The message was also harder to understand in 'The Son's Veto'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Harper Lee section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Harper Lee essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss Harper Lee's portrayal of the black community in To Kill A Mockingbird

    5 star(s)

    him pathos, and shows his vulnerability, it makes the reader feel all the more sorry for him. All of these good qualities of Tom Robinson's make us feel all the more that he does not deserve the racism which he faces.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Examine the different kinds of prejudice and injustice which you have found in 'To ...

    4 star(s)

    Atticus is subjected to prejudice from Scout and Jem because of his age. He is a slightly older father than most. Scout and Jem think of him as weak and, to some extent, useless. "Atticus was feeble: he was nearly fifty...He was much older than the parents of our school

  1. To Kill A Mockingbird Imagery and Symbolism

    Heck Tate the sheriff decides not to get Boo in trouble as he has actually saved the children and Heck Tate decides to report that Mr Ewell fell on his knife in order to spare Boo. But alternatively he might have lied to protect the Ewell's from the humiliation that bob had tried to kill innocent children.

  2. To Kill A Mockingbird Full Summary

    Atticus tells them that they are "both right," suggesting a more nuanced interpretation of the patterns of history, family, identity, and temperament, which the book will from now on set out to explore in more detail. Scout narrates the book in the first person but in the past tense.

  1. What do we learn about Maycomb society in Harper Lee's; To Kill a Mockingbird?

    In addition the church itself on the outside also shows the poverty, as it's: "an ancient paint-peeled frame building20". Not only is the building materialistically poor, but the Church has no possessions that a more affluent society would have in their Church.

  2. What important lessons do the children learn in Part I of 'To Kill a ...

    This was because she wanted to teach all the children the same and did not take their personalities or backgrounds into account when teaching them and treats them all on the same level. However, they are not because some of the children had already been in this grade and some

  1. To Kill a Mockingbird Lit Review

    Atticus Finch was a character with great moral integrity, courage, and bravery. He instilled values in his children that, while contradicting those of Maycomb, were leading them in the right path. Even though Atticus knew that he could not change the society and that nobody would agree with his

  2. Compare and contrast how the role of childhood is presented in the novels To ...

    (To Kill a Mocking Bird, P.35) (A point to note is that it is easier for Atticus to place importance on a good standard of education than it is for the MacTeers or the Breedloves, because he has been able to provide Scout and Jem their basic needs.)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work