• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A comparison between 'The Son's Veto' by Thomas Hardy and 'To Kill a Mockingbird' by Harper Lee

Extracts from this document...


A comparison between 'The Son's Veto' by Thomas Hardy and 'To Kill a Mockingbird' by Harper Lee I am going to be comparing the novel 'To Kill a Mockingbird' and 'The Son's Veto'. After reading these I noticed several things. They are linked by the moral of the story and by the differences. 'To Kill a Mockingbird' is set in the 1930's. Its main theme is the prejudice and discrimination in which Scout and Jem are brought up. After the civil war in America in 1867 black slavery was abolished, and although by law prejudice was unacceptable, this was not the case within modern society. People still saw Blacks as inferior, even those who may be better off than some whites. In 'To Kill a Mockingbird' this situation is presented to us by a court case in which a black man is accused of raping a white woman. Even though it is obvious that he is innocent, he is found guilty due to the way blacks are seen. As white's were still in power, they were seen as the superior race, people had the idea that coloured people were less intelligent and bad people. Blacks were denied equal opportunities, despite the laws and were therefore unable to reach their full potential, thus giving whites justification for their prejudice. ...read more.


It is written in third person narrative, and Sophy is the main character. The message of this story is not as clear, although we see how women are treated as belongings who have no right to make decisions and have no feelings. 'It will degrade me in the eyes of all the gentlemen in England,' her son, Randolph, replied when Sophy asked his permission to marry Sam. We are given Randolph in this story to show the prejudiced views on the lower class. It is similar to 'To Kill a Mockingbird' in the way that prejudice was an accepted way of life and it is irrelevant how happy a person is, being etiquette is paramount in society. Although this message is not based on Thomas Hardy, the fact that he managed to move social classes is not dissimilar to Sophy. The language in 'To Kill a Mockingbird' is a mixture of Standard English, American and Childish dialect. We can speculate that the Standard English is meant to be believed by the reader, as these present the facts of Maycomb. The narration is always Standard English and in first person narrative. Scout uses very adult terminology; this could be because Harper Lee may be looking back on similar events in her life, and making sense of the thoughts she ad at the time. ...read more.


They don't do anything for the community and send their children to the first day of school each year but nothing more. But because they are white they still have a higher status than the Robinson's and for this reason win the trial. Even though it is obvious he is innocent and it is suspected that Mr Ewell may have committed the crime himself because he disliked the relationship between Tom and his daughter. This emphasises how prejudiced the community is. I think that Harper Lee wrote this book not only to show the reader the past and how society worked, but also to teach us lessons for modern life. Through the book we discover the hurt and unfairness of inequality, and therefore think more carefully about out future actions. Gossip also still exists today, probably more than ever with chat shows, magazines and tabloid newspapers joining in. I think it is a huge lesson to us all. In conclusion I think that both books are not just for enjoyment, but also to make us think more carefully about others and our actions. I have learned that before I judge anyone I should get to know him or her. 'To Kill a Mockingbird' was easier to read, but because 'The Son's Veto' is written in an older language it seems of a higher standard. The message was also harder to understand in 'The Son's Veto'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Harper Lee section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Harper Lee essays

  1. How does Harper Lee present Maycomb in "To kill a Mockingbird"?

    Boo Radley is described negatively at the start of the novel and as a "monster". When the kids are pushing scout down the hill in the tyre and it hits Boo's house, she runs away as fast as she can as she thinks that Boo Radley is going to do something to her.

  2. In Which Ways Does Harper Lee Use "Outsiders" In "To Kill A Mockingbird"?

    Through the outsiders we can really see what the characters in Maycomb are like. They help us see what they're like by acting in their selfish and racist ways and show us how, in this period of time, black people are thought upon because of their alternative lifestyles.

  1. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee is a novel that teaches the audience ...

    When Atticus loses the trial, he tries to make his children understand that although he lost, he thinks they have a good chance if an appeal comes through. Atticus tells Jem and Scout that no matter how evident the proof is, it all comes back to your race.

  2. What important lessons do the children learn in Part I of 'To Kill a ...

    of them had been taught nothing at all, so they needed to start off at different points. When Miss Caroline is holding up flashcards, Scout says 'I was bored, so began a letter to Dill.' She realises that this teaching will not help her.

  1. To Kill a Mockingbird

    Gilmer shows to the witness. However, many other cases of racial prejudice take place throughout the novel. One case of racial prejudice can be found in the way in which Aunt Alexandra treats Calpurnia. Calpurnia is one of the main characters of the novel. She is member of the black society, but also looks after Jem and Scout.

  2. How effectively does Harper Lee convey her ideas about prejudice in her novel To ...

    Harper Lee uses gender discrimination and prejudice to convey the point of difference and acceptance. The role of women in 1930's was to help out throughout the Great Depression when women were panicking about the wellbeing of their husbands, houses, family and themselves; as well as trying to assist their husbands emotionally and financially through employment.

  1. To kill a mockingbird ch7-10 summary

    He says that there has been talk around that he ought not to defend Jem. Scout asks why he is still doing it. Atticus responds that if he didn't take the case, he wouldn't be able to "hold up his head in town".

  2. How are Prejudice and Hypocrisy explored in Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird? Notes ...

    Aunt Alexandra says ?But they?re not our kind of folks?he?is?trash, I?ll not have you around him, picking up his habits and learning Lord-knows-what.? Aunt Alexandra does not allow Scout to play with the Cunninghams, as she refers to them as lower-class citizens and does not look up to them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work