• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Act Four provides a shocking conclusion to Arthur Miller's play. How does he manage to draw the audience so firmly behind John Proctor, and what relevance does the play hold for audiences of today?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Act Four provides a shocking conclusion to Arthur Miller's play. How does he manage to draw the audience so firmly behind John Proctor, and what relevance does the play hold for audiences of today? A 'crucible' is a melting pot in which metals are melted down in extreme heat, to burn off any impurities. This, therefore, is an appropriate name for Arthur Miller's 1953 play The Crucible. The play is set in the village of Salem, Massachusetts, in 1692. At this time, the society of Salem was based around a theocracy - a combination of state and religious power - whose function was to keep the community together, and to prevent any type of disunity that might open it to destruction by material or ideological enemies. The people were puritanical in every respect; their creed forbade anything that resembled vain enjoyment, such as a theatre or novels. They did not celebrate Christmas, and a holiday from work meant nothing more than time to concentrate even more on prayer. They were also urged to keep their morals through hard work. To the Europeans of the time, the whole province was inhabited by a sect of barbaric fanatics, and the workers had to fight the land all the time to produce their goods for export, although these goods were of ever increasing quality. ...read more.

Middle

Where this does not affect his public life, he feels that he needs the support and forgiveness of Elizabeth, and it angers him that his honesty is doubted. Another thing that endears an audience of The Crucible to John Proctor is the sense of innocence surrounding him. We know that he has sinned by having the affair with Abigail. However, he believes that, because he has confessed himself to Elizabeth, and allowed her to dismiss Abigail, that she should automatically forgive him, and stop suspecting him all the time. He believes that Elizabeth has judged him, and that 'her justice would freeze beer'. And this seems to be a typical assumption of a man with the character of John Proctor. However, John Proctor does not see the way the danger that Abigail poses until it is too late. Whereas Elizabeth sees straight away that Abigail is plotting to have her killed so that she may take her place as John's wife, John is unable to comprehend this, and does not see how much danger Abigail Williams poses to the life of his wife, or the way her intentions could affect him. He simply believes, or wants to believe, that the high court will see that the accusations against Elizabeth are totally unfounded, and she will escape conviction. ...read more.

Conclusion

*** In conclusion, The Crucible ends on a very shocking and unexpected note with the death of John Proctor, and the fashion in which John Proctor is sentenced manufactures a situation in which we see John Proctor as a hero and a saint. This prompts an angry response from the audience, and delivers strong morals that still have relevance to society today. John Proctor is an innocent and honest man, who falls victim to the spiralling events of a hysterical, paranoid society, taken to the brink of destruction by the witchcraft trials. We see that John Proctor is only getting involved in the trials because he knows they are false, and to save his innocent wife and friends, and in the end, we see him die because he cannot bear to live with the guilt of lying to save his own, sinful life when so many before him had died in pure innocence. Today, we can understand that perhaps we should not be so easily taken in by the hysteria of events, and attempt to understand what is happening before we make judgments, and to know that the power of belief without understanding is a deadly force, which can ruin people's lives, and also destroy faith in the judiciary system, as it did in 1692 Salem. 20th Century Drama Coursework for GCSE English Grade A/A* ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the relationship between John Proctor and Abigail Williams and how Arthur Miller presents ...

    4 star(s)

    not, we are surprised and this adds to the dramatic power of the play. In Act 3, we see Proctor accusing Abigail of plotting to murder his wife. "I believe she means to murder." He accuses all the girls of being acting the whole thing out.

  2. In the Crucible, Arthur Miller shows us how fear and suspicion can destroy a ...

    Hysteria ensues as the townspeople of Salem consider there may be witchcraft in their midst, and begin to recall friends and neighbours' past actions that have been suspicious. This becomes clear when Proctor says 'I'll tell you what's walking Salem now--vengeance is walking Salem.

  1. How and why does Arthur Miller encourage audience sympathy for John Proctor

    She lies to protect him and save his good name and reputation, even if it meant she as still accused. But, in doing this, she also protects Abigail, and her claims of witchcraft become more credible to the courts once again.

  2. How does Miller capture and maintain the audience's interest in The Crucible?

    used the image of light "There is a narrow window at the left. Through its leaded pains the morning sunlight streams. A candle still burns near the bed... The room gives of an air of clean spare-ness." This symbolises that everything is OK, there are no bad things happening.

  1. To what extent can John Proctor be described as a tragic hero in Arthur ...

    He witnessed his wife Elizabeth go through the agony of being accused as a witch. He suffers because he too was accused of betraying God. Their true suffering becomes apparent when Proctor confesses to adultery to pardon Elizabeth. Elizabeth lies in turn to save her husband's name.

  2. Examine the end of act one in 'The Crucible.' Consider its importance of this ...

    Stage directions are present to create a different atmosphere. Frightened by the coming process, Tituba shifts the blame to other well-known middle-aged women in the village of Salem. The characters are amazed and slightly hesitant by the surprise of the women accused: Sarah Good and Goody Osburn. Hale checks her belief to make sure she is a good Christian woman and that in God's holy name she blesses him.

  1. The Crucible's Relevance to today's Society

    He was a U.S.A senator from Wisconsin (1947-57). He achieved national fame and power with his sensational and unsubstantiated accusations against those U.S. officials (frequently in high positions) he termed card carrying Communists. After the Senate condemned him (1954), his influence steadily declined. After this the word McCarthyism has become synonymous with the practice of publicising accusations of treason and disloyalty with insufficient evidence.

  2. "The Crucible" - John Proctor says, "I'll tell you what's walking Salem, vengeance is ...

    Nearing the end of the play, when John Proctor has been accused of witchcraft and is to be hanged, Parris' character changes somewhat. Prior to the accusation against Proctor, Parris has slandered John Proctor and Giles to judge Danforth so that they will not be believed because he knows that if they are, it will look bad on his part.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work