Baz Lurhman’s modernization of Shakespeare’s classic “Romeo and Juliet”

Authors Avatar

Baz Lurhman’s modernization of Shakespeare’s classic “Romeo and Juliet” was, in my opinion, very successful and brought Shakespeare to a whole new audience.  He combines modern issues with Shakespearian language to great effect, resulting in a rather contemporary but very enjoyable film.

The main difference between the play and the film is that instead of ancient Verona in Italy, the film is set on Verona beach in modern day America.  At first the film seems strange as the play is set in the present era yet all the actors are speaking in Shakespearian dialect, but as the film continues this adds to the impressiveness and excitement of it.  By casting young popular actors/actresses like Leonardo Di Caprio and Clare Danes Baz Lurhman has brought in a younger audience who would not otherwise go to see a work by William Shakespeare, and the fact that the film is set in modern America and has scenes of violence involving guns and fighting would draw in more of a male audience than if it was set in 16th Century England.  I think that by incorporating modern issues such as homosexuality, drugs and violence he has made the film more relevant to today’s society.  In the film it was never openly stated that Mercutio was gay, but hints are made at his homosexuality when he dresses up as a woman and by his feelings towards  Romeo; he certainly likes Romeo a lot-you could almost call it infatuation.  Hallucinogenic drugs are taken by the Montague boys before the party; this brings in a modern twist to the story.  Another modern perk to the film is the fighting between the Capulet’s and the Montague’s, featuring guns-which can commonly be found on many American streets nowadays.  

Baz Lurhman has been very clever in the subtle connections he has implied between Shakespeare’s play and his version, for example in the fight scene he subconsciously plants the idea of fire in your mind as the camera focuses on the sign reading “add more fuel to your fire”;  on the side of the guns the word ‘sword’ was written, and of course swords were used instead of guns in the ‘old’ version.  Also on their guns each families’ coat of arms adorned the handle of the pistol.  The camera picked up on each of these factors by zooming in while all other action in that scene was frozen for a few seconds.  Another example of this is the number plates on the cars, as while the camera zooms in on them the background is still.  The camera pauses at first by each of the main characters and families and displays their name, as if to tell you who is who and who belongs to which family.

Join now!

The cinematography in this film is stunning as the camera acts like a human eye; it looks all around, darts from scene to scene, often circles people and closes in on things of interest.  The camera very much focuses on facial expressions at times, a good example of this is when Juliet has just watched Romeo drink the poison; the camera closes in on her face so that it almost covers the entire screen and focuses on the one tear slowly rolling down her cheek, or during the fight scene near the start, the camera ‘slam zooms’ on their ...

This is a preview of the whole essay