Comment on the following extract, the opening of In a free state, a novel by V.S. Naipul (born 1932). In your response you should include a consideration of the writers use of language and his attitude towards the characters and the situation depicted.

Authors Avatar

Comment on the following extract, the opening of In a free state, a novel by V.S. Naipul (born 1932). In your response you should include a consideration of the writers use of language and his attitude towards the characters and the situation depicted.

Though many of poets and authors are purged by a notion to do something about the world’s dire conditions that they write about, they don’t. They complain and rave about in their texts, bringing out the morbid atmosphere of the place, but they know that owe their inspiration to those very conditions; without them, the stimulation to narrate powerful texts such as the tramp at Piraeus could have never arisen. V.S. Naipaul illustrates his journey from Piraeus to Alexandria in a morose tone and gloomy language. Most texts written about a journey have elaborate details about its natural surroundings, but this extract indulges more into the ‘dingy’ steamer itself and its passengers. He takes an insight into understanding his fellow passengers, especially the tramp. Using these techniques, V.S. Naipaul has produced an influential and forlorn text.

        The text is written from the view of the first person, allowing the reader to feel more involved with the text – “as soon as I saw the dingy little Greek Steamer I felt I ought to have made other arrangements”. We see the whole journey from his point of view, thus our views of the situation and characters are based solely on his opinion. This personal approach lets the reader indulge into the extract on a more personal level. The narrator seems to be a wealthy person, hence being able to get tickets on the upper part of the ship, and this allows the situation to be seen through the critical eye of the middle/upper class; “We on the upper…on the lower deck didn’t”

Join now!

        Naipaul creates a melancholic, moody and suffocating atmosphere, using despondent words to describe the situation and characters: ‘subdued’, ‘humped’, ‘tremulous’, ‘ruin’. This allows the reader to actually experience what the narrator feels as he views the conditions and the characters.

Naipaul doesn’t give us a pleasant illustration of the characters. He says that “Greek civility was something we had left on the shore; it belonged perhaps to the idleness, unemployment and pastoral despair.” This is an ironic statement, as one would expect rudeness to stem from the squatter conditions, certainly not civility. Perhaps Naipaul is reflecting on the claustrophobic atmosphere ...

This is a preview of the whole essay