• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare two film versions of Romeo and Juliet.

Extracts from this document...


Year 10 Media Assignment William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet leaves a lot of room for creative elaboration. His work is still a popular choice for theatre-goers and a director will choose their own approach. Zefferelli's version (1968) was screened nearly 30 years before Luhrmann's (1997) and the two present very different ideas. Luhrmann's modern adaptation has shown young people worldwide that Shakespeare is as relevant today as it ever was. Each adaptation of Romeo and Juliet is intended for a certain type of audience. Zefferelli aimed his production at all ages, but especially the older generation that would enjoy a more traditional portrayal of the play. Traditional dress, 16th century setting, swordfighting and Received Pronunciation are all used to make it an accurate film that people can study from. This widely contrasts with the angle chosen by director Baz Luhrmann for his own adaptation of Romeo and Juliet. Instead of making a film for everyone, Luhrmann challenged himself by making a film of a Shakespearean story set in a modern culture. By doing this, he aimed his own version at teenagers, particularly American teenagers as the majority of the cast are American, presenting the play in a modern, up-to-date format, with much more violence, including guns as weapons and modern drug culture, making it less appealing to the older generation, but very popular amongst young people. ...read more.


As a result of doing this, Sampson's line had to be changed from, 'A dog of the house of Montague moves me' to 'A dog of the house of Capulet moves me'. Also, Abra, a servant to the Montagues in the text, has been moved to the Capulet family. This may have been done just to balance the sides out and show that everybody has a part to play in the feud. Another change made to the lines in the first scene is that Montague and Capulets' lines are reversed, again, this is just to show that there is a parallel between both sides and they are just as much to blame as each other. Although I understood why Baz Luhrmann chose to do this I found these changes rather unnecessary and at times confusing. In both versions the text is accurate to Shakespeare's play, but a lot has been edited for dramatic effect. In the Luhrmann film version, lines which are unimportant or insignificant have been edited along with parts which people might find offensive (Mercutio talks about raping women) and lines which are dated such as those about slaves. A major change from the original in Luhrmann is that all actors are American whereas in Zefferelli all characters are English and speak in Standard English, the accent used for which is Received Pronunciation. ...read more.


This explains his character, which also shows that modern English is added to give the audience more understanding. Although I found Zefferelli's version of the play accurate and enjoyable, I think that for a modern audience this traditional type of portrayal of Shakespeare gives people the wrong impression that Shakespeare is solely for upper class citizens. I personally found it enjoyable, but I doubt many people nowadays would want to continue watching the rest of this film from the introduction given, rather than opt for a more modern adaptation of Romeo and Juliet, such as that by Baz Luhrmann. His version works extremely effectively in attracting people to the watch the rest of the film. The loud powerful music and action during the prologue invite people to continue watching, as it shows the audience right from the beginning exactly what to expect from the rest of the film. Despite stating my preference to the later adaptation of Romeo and Juliet, I think that an uneducated audience may believe that all the added modern aspects of Luhrmann's production is exactly how Shakespeare wrote his play, which may cause some confusion. Overall, I believe that Luhrmann produced the better and certainly more unique adaptation, and although Zefferelli's does seem more traditionally accurate, it is less inviting from its introduction to watch the rest of the film. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were made by ...

    Juliet was symbolically dressed as an angel to represent beauty, innocence, purity, and gentleness. This led the audience to believe that she was the heroine and almost like the damsel in distress or the princess in the fairy tales wherein the knight had to save her.

  2. Comparing two versions of Romeo & Juliet (Zefferelli and Baz Luhram).

    characters and then freezes as text is used to introduce each person, when the screen is un-freezed, the action goes back to being fast and furious again. This is very different compared to the calm, collective atmosphere of Zefferelli´┐Żs opening scene, where the two families embark on a sword fight after the quarrelling.

  1. Comparisons between Baz Luhrmann and Zeferelli versions of Romeo and Juliet

    For example, Juliet wears white and is dressed as an angel to show her virginity and innocence. Romeo is dressed as a knight to signify that he is Juliet's knight in shining armour. Alternatively, the costumes are less obvious and don't show the characters personalities as much in Zeferelli's version.

  2. How does Baz Luhrmann use film techniques to make Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" more ...

    He also wanted to portray the open drug culture of modern society, depicting the moment when Romeo took an ecstasy tablet or so-called 'love tablet' not only to highlight to a younger audience the disastrous effects of drugs but also to symbolize the ecstasy of youthful love between the two main characters which Shakespeare expressed through poetic love verses.

  1. How does Baz Luhrmann adapt the prologue and opening scene of Romeo and Juliet ...

    The two households are now together in one petrol station. The tension created at this scene is immense as the audience panic about what is going to happen next. The Capulets are portrayed as Hispanics and they come across as much tougher and violent people than the Montagues.

  2. Auteur research study. Auteur? - Baz Luhrmann

    Observes producer Craig Pierce, (item 13) Although complete artistic freedom would be ideal Luhrmann recognises the importance of keeping Hollywood onside. He understands their reluctance to hand over thousands of dollars for a high risk production. He agrees, "studios don't run towards you to give you $50,000,000 in order to

  1. In this essay I shall be discussing the differences and similarities between two film ...

    The colour of both is black. The music is in the background from the very beginning, it is a loot, plucking strings, style tune. This prologue takes 1 minute and 6 seconds and does not play a very important or memorable part in this version of the play.

  2. The Generation Gap:comparing the starts of two film versions of Romeo and Juliet

    However, in Luhrmann's version of the play, things happen differently. Juliet is walking by the pool when Romeo startles her and they both fall into the pool. Their conversation then takes place in the pool. They share a several passionate kisses between getting interrupted by a nosy security guard.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work