• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

Comparing and contrasting "Digging" by Seamus Heaney, and "He was" by Richard Wilbur.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE ENGLISH COURSEWORK 2002 >> POETRY COMPARISON Comparing and contrasting "Digging" by Seamus Heaney, and "He was" by Richard Wilbur. 'Digging' and 'He was' both examine father-son relationships with a sense of pride and admiration. However, both poems can also be read as an exploration and a challenge to what is considered to be "art". Throughout the two poems there are repeated references to the artistry of poetry and working in the field. The essay will explore how this is achieved, the similarities and differences of two poems. The connection between the poetry writing and working on the field is repeatedly linked in both poems. Indeed a variety of poetic devices are used to reinforce this, for example, the "hoe" in 'He was' is the father's tool, just as the "squat pen" is the writer's tool in 'Digging'. This emphasizes the closeness between writing a poem and digging. Stanza three of 'Digging' and stanza two of 'He was', both refer to the physical labour of their father's work. Indeed the connection between digging and poetry is once again reinforced by the "rhythm" and "sound" of the father's work. The father's work has a rhythm to it just as it is often necessary for the poet to find a rhythm through his or her choice of words. For example, in 'Digging', the poet describes the movements made by his father as "When the spade sinks into gravelly ground" and "Nicking and slicing neatly", and in 'He was', the poet describes the sounds of his father working, "The chug, choke, and high madrigal wheeze". ...read more.

Middle

This interrupts the fluidly of the poem, and conveys a sense of interlude, just like the way a person stops to think about the past memories, and there is also a hint of underlying sense of deep pride, emphasized by the word, "By God". This stresses the fact that writing and digging can not be achieved through one standard process with just no thought attached to it. 'He was' focuses upon religious imagery in order to compare how Jesus' work still lives on through Biblical stories, just as his father's work lives on through the orchard, and the speaker's work lives on in poetry. The last stanza is also reminiscent of the resurrection, just as Jesus rose from the dead, so does the speaker's father through the "livening clay". The effect of religious imagery is uplifting and rejoiceful. There is no sense of sadness or of closure, because the poet believes his father's voice lives on. Indeed even though both poems appear at first to be commenting on the break up of the male line, after studying the poem my response changed, and I read it as a description of past male voices which can still be heard and consequently this becomes a cause or reason for commemoration. Both poems recount memories of the past, but they do so in different ways. 'Digging' draws on historical recollections in order to accentuate his father's skill. The poet refers to the Irish famine and the way in which "My Grandfather cut more turf in a day than any other man on Toner's bog". ...read more.

Conclusion

I think one of the major difference in two poems are that in 'He was', the speaker's father is dead where as the father in 'Digging' is still well and alive, even though he has now retired. The death of Richard Wilbur's father is suggested by the phases, "He was a brown old man" which is clearly a past tense and "Until he went in the dead of fall" which clearly highlights that the speaker's father is deceased. I think this is the reason there are more uses of religious imagery and the writing is more poetic, where as 'Digging' is more conversational and direct. In 'Digging', the speaker ends the poem with the words, "I'll dig with it". I think the poet reflects on what he can do as an individual. I think the poet is trying to illustrate the connection between his father and grandfather digging and himself, that they are all skilled in what they do as a job. In 'He was' however, the ending of the poem has some sort of cathartic feeling and atmosphere. The fact that he links his poem to the religious imagery has an effect of cleansing the mind of the speaker, rather than firmly deciding what the speaker is going to do as demonstrated in 'Digging'. Both poems express a true sense of awe and respect for their 'father' work, and there is a very real sense of celebration running through each poem. This theme lends itself to very powerful historical and religious images which emphasizes the legacy of fathers work to the soil. The closeness between father and son is repeated in the connection between writing and working in the field. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Seamus Heaney section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Seamus Heaney essays

  1. Compare and contrast the way Seamus Heaney and D.H Lawrence depict childhood feelings and ...

    Seamus Heaney uses his word choices to impact the reader also, except his help convey a sense of the character writing the poem - for example in Mid-Term Break, simple language is used to express the naivety, youth and uncertainty of Seamus when this event happened.

  2. Seamus Heaney uses various ways to explore the theme of family life in his ...

    Heaney once again describes his weaknesses in the next stanza, he describes himself as a "nuisance, tripping falling, yapping always " this once again shows Heaney's ineptness at being a farmer. Then there is a caesura in the next line. This is where Heaney starts contrasting himself with his ancestors.

  1. Write an essay on Heaney's poetry in the light of his statement that it ...

    The mature poet finds himself able to express and commit to his own political loyalties in Northern Ireland with new-found confidence. In Field Work, the scope of Heaney's poetry widens. The political dimension to Heaney's poetry is simultaneously accompanied by an appreciation of how this impinges on individual lives and identities.

  2. Choose any two poems you feel have common theme (or themes). Write about them ...

    A double meaning is presented in the final line of the second stanza: - "...Big Jim Evans saying it was a hard blow..." The 'hard blow' may be referring to the actual 'blow' that killed Christopher (as he was killed by a car), or the fact that it's a 'hard blow' to the family.

  1. How Seamus Heaney Evokes the Sensations and Emotions of Childhood by Comparing any Three ...

    'Gold' seems to suggest that it is a very elaborate finish to all their hard work throughout the day. Heaney uses the colours to describe how things looked in "Churning Day". In "An Advancement of Learning", Heaney talks about the river being 'oil-skinned, wearing a transfer of gables' (Line 4)

  2. GCSE English Seamus Heaney - 'At a Potato Digging', 'Follower', 'Death ...

    and the way death or the prospect of death can affect people. The Field-Mouse / The Man He Killed - These poems deal with loss and also question the suffering that has taken place and its pointlessness. On My First Sonne - This poem concerns the loss of a child

  1. What similarities and differences can you see in 'The Thought-Fox' and 'Digging' in terms ...

    'The Thought-Fox' on the other hand can be simply interpreted as just the breakthrough of writers block, by the last stanza the writer has successfully completed a page of writing, and the problem is solved. The issue of not having the ideas or imagination to write has been solved by

  2. Analyse the poem "Digging" by the contemporary Irish poet Seamus Heaney.

    Heaney puts his position in the poem first and last to show the poem is as much about him as his father and grandfather. He feels equal to his father, unlike in the poem "Follower". This is because he has chosen his own career path.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work