Comparison of ‘Frankenstein’ by Mary Shelly to ‘The Doom Stone’ by Paul Zindel

Authors Avatar
Frankenstein's creation, having shown such anguish, must be understood to be more of a heroic creature, rather than a "wretched monster" as Victor continues to call it. The creature has been placed into a cold world, with monstrous features; however, a soul is not given to a creature through science. Calling this creature a monster is unacceptable, for the only thing which separates him from the rest of humankind is the fact that he is extremely tall and unattractive-even hideous. Such is the way Victor views his creation. Because it has such repulsing features, Victor believes that it also has inherent malice and is thus a monster. Victor is supposed to be the hero; the great scientist that creates new life from the dead-and he is a great scientist. But the true hero is his creature. For his creature overcomes the hardships of life on its own. One must imagine abandoning an infant. This infant, Frankenstein's creation, has developed the social skills that it must live by. How can one be shunned for not knowing better? Victor Frankenstein definitely knew better. He did grow up in a household; he had friendship, education, love, and values. However, he deviates from these values, for nobody would just abandon an infant as he did. Therefore, it is Victor who displays the more monstrous behavior and it is his creature who, although it did murder, has dominant heroic traits. For although these murders were committed, the driving force, and the explanations lie within society. The society of which Victor's creation was not permitted to be a part.

In the creature's account of his loneliness and fear, it becomes evident, that this being, although not human, is humane. He is left alone, to survive in a desolate state of anguish; to overcome and integrate into a society which he does not yet understand. He is astonished by the "cottagers" who he observes so diligently, attempting to learn from them as much as possible, "... [knowledge] clings to the mind, when it has once seized on it, like a lichen on the rock." More and more must the reader have sympathy with this poor, innocent creature, for " of my creation and creator I was absolutely ignorant, but I knew that I possessed no money, no friends...I was endued with a figure hideously deformed and loathsome; I was not even of the same nature as man"(85). How can he be expected to know the difference between right and wrong; good and evil?
Join now!


In today's modern society, children are accustomed to the norms and values of life through their parents. Well, should this creature be held accountable for his actions, as such, having not 'grown up?' Should he be viewed as a little child who does not know better yet? It must be so, for it was not this individual's fault for having been left out of society. For all it's worth, he did try to learn; he did try to become more human; he did try to understand. But, nobody would allow him to "integrate". The closest he gets to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay