Discuss whether the Merchant of Venice is not worthy of study because the characters in the play do not show their good sides.

Authors Avatar

        In this essay I am going to discuss whether I feel that the Merchant of Venice is not worthy of study because the characters in the play do not show their good sides.  I will study the characters and their actions to decide whether I agree or whether I disagree.

        One of the reasons that I believe we should study it because I believe that the play is about racism, not a racist play.  It was designed as a play to be topical at the time as anti-Semitism was a topical issue at the time.  Proof of this is when the Jew, Shylock, makes his moving speech of desperation in Act 3 Scene 1, which is full of rhetorical questions to the Christians, saying inside we all have the same emotions and feelings regardless of race or religion.  If the play was racist and William Shakespeare was an anti-Semite he would not have written this speech that defends ethnic minorities saying that race does not make a difference to the type of person inside.  I believe that the text teaches us about racism and how nasty it can be and why it is a bad thing that we should discard from today’s society.

We can see how racism affects Shylock and how it develops his need for revenge.  We can also see how distraught he becomes and how the racists take everything he has.  I feel that the play is saying that if we try to take revenge then it can backfire on us.  Shylock becomes equally as racist in the play saying, ‘I hate him (Antonio) for he is a Christian.’  He then goes on to attempt to kill Antonio; this shows that Shylock can be just as flagitious.  I believe this makes the play morally legitimate because Shylock does not benefit in the end from being depraved.  He forfeits his daughter, ducats, dogma, and dignity.  The little respect he did have will have unquestionably dissipated.

Join now!

        One character that modifies my feelings towards the play is Launcelot Gobbo.  He like Jessica becomes disloyal to his father; he mocks his frail and elderly father jesting at his lack of sight.  Instead of helping him he instead decides to play an artifice on him.  It is in the play as bawdy humour, which I can understand why, but I do not believe that we should be teaching our children to mock and laugh at our elders.  They should be instead taught of respect and how we should be fond of our parents.  Launcelot Gobbo is also a racist, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay