• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss whether the Merchant of Venice is not worthy of study because the characters in the play do not show their good sides.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In this essay I am going to discuss whether I feel that the Merchant of Venice is not worthy of study because the characters in the play do not show their good sides. I will study the characters and their actions to decide whether I agree or whether I disagree. One of the reasons that I believe we should study it because I believe that the play is about racism, not a racist play. It was designed as a play to be topical at the time as anti-Semitism was a topical issue at the time. Proof of this is when the Jew, Shylock, makes his moving speech of desperation in Act 3 Scene 1, which is full of rhetorical questions to the Christians, saying inside we all have the same emotions and feelings regardless of race or religion. If the play was racist and William Shakespeare was an anti-Semite he would not have written this speech that defends ethnic minorities saying that race does not make a difference to the type of person inside. ...read more.

Middle

The only reasons he gives for this is because of Shylock's friendliness! He calls Shylock, 'the Jew,' so this suggests that his real reason for his hate for his master is because of his race. The actions of Jessica to her father are completely wrong, I believe that she has the right to marry someone of any religion, but she has no right to steal from her own father, this is completely iniquitous. Even though Jessica is disloyal to her father I have concluded that there is a moral in this, she later becomes unhappy after leaving him. She is with her husband after they have just been married; she should obviously be content and joyful, however she is uncomfortable and sad. She claims that this is because of the sweet music she can hear. I believe that this is actually just an excuse and she is beginning to regret her unfaithfulness. It is teaching us that being unfaithful will make you feel guilty inevitably. ...read more.

Conclusion

They both show us that they are only in love for money. We should be teaching our children the right reasons for marriage not for greed of money. Another person that Bassanio appears to only like for his money is Antonio, he only visits him for the purpose of asking for money. He does however show some care for Antonio saying, 'you shall not seal to such a bond for me: I'll rather dwell in my necessity.' We do not know however whether this is true concern or not. I believe that in the play, 'The Merchant of Venice,' that the characters do not always show their good sides, I believe there are mostly moral reasons for this and that the play can teach us a lot. This is why I believe that, 'The Merchant of Venice,' is worthy of study. It teaches about how racism affects people, why it is wrong and how it does not always benefit the racist. It also teaches us how we should be loyal to our parents and that greed does not always benefit us. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE The Merchant of Venice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE The Merchant of Venice essays

  1. THE MERCHANT OF VENICE IS A RACIST PLAY. DISCUSS.

    At one point, Solanio says "unless the devil himself turns Jew", which is implying that the only way the devil could be worse is to turn Jewish - this is simply stating that the devil is better than a Jew.

  2. Shakespeare's play, 'The merchant of Venice' - what do we learn about the character ...

    Bassanio is trying to get the message across that the truth is not always evident at first glance - beautiful exteriors can hide ugly things. Lawyers can get the guilty off, an evil person can appear to be religious, cowards make themselves look brave and ugly women cover themselves in beautiful make - up.

  1. 'Is, 'The Merchant of Venice' a racist play? Discuss'.

    He attempts to promote equality more than once during the play which would have been dangerous to do during that era that he was alive, because it was not openly accepted. When the Prince of Morocco chooses the wrong casket Portia says "a gentle riddance" which in itself is not

  2. The Merchant of Venice is a racist play - Discuss

    Finally, when Portia, disguised as the Judge tells him he can have exactly one pound of flesh, but he can't draw one drop of blood, Shylock agrees to take the money, but they won't let him. Now they take his estate and divide it between Antonio and the state.

  1. Is 'The Merchant of Venice' a racist play?

    This idea can clearly convey that Shylock is trying to imply that Christians are of no value. However Shylock begins to convey how Antonio's treatment has turned his life into a misery. He states that he has, "hindered me half a million" which shows that Shylock has stopped him from making a great profit.

  2. Is the Merchant of venice a racist play?

    Antonio replies "Fie, Fie!" The second "Fie" could be Antonio reassuring himself that he is not in love. This scene shows a very different emotion to the one portrayed in Act one Scene three when Shylock is first introduced to us talking about money "Three thousand ducats" Antonio is shown as dismissive of money being the cause of his sadness.

  1. The Merchant of Venice is a Racist Play.

    Marx suppressed vvysqfvk's rationalisation . In Act 3, Scene 1, when Shylock's daughter, Jessica elopes with a Christian taking all of Shylock's money and Jewels, he is portrayed to care more about the loss of his riches, than about his missing daughter.

  2. If a man has prejudged, negative opinions against a group of people, because of ...

    to Antonio. This marks him as a usurer, someone who lends money and charges interest, which was hated in Elizabethan times. This may seem hard to understand as this is how major banks work today, but in the Old Testament the exacting of interest on a loan was forbidden to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work