• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine Arthur Miller's Presentation Of John Proctor's Moral Journey - The Crucible by Arthur Miller

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Examine Arthur Miller's Presentation Of John Proctor's Moral Journey "The Crucible" by Arthur Miller is a play based upon an American settlement during the late 1600's. It is centred around actual events from history to try to portray the way of life in this era. Miller has chosen the confusion of the witch trials of this time, to provide a base for the struggles of his main character, John Proctor. At the beginning of the play the focus is laid mainly on introducing the main characters and storyline, but as the script unfolds, it becomes clear that John Proctor is the main character, something not immediately obvious from the beginning. It is how Miller presents and demonstrates Proctor's moral journey throughout the play, and the different channels he uses to do this that I will focus on. Act One really only sets the scene for the play by portraying the different characters in the Salem and how their ways of life revolve mostly around the 'church' and their religion. The inhabitants can for the most part be sectioned off into three groups; the established figures, eg. Rev. Parris; the citizens, and people who have in theory 'earned' their status, eg. ...read more.

Middle

now he says and does everything and anything he can to please his wife. An example of this in Miller's script is in the scene involving Proctor and Elizabeth where John praises his wife's cooking, when just seconds before he had tasted it and added extra seasoning. The most plausible explanation for this is that Proctor believes that by 'keeping things sweet' with Elizabeth, he will have more space to come to terms with the situation he is in. If he has to go to court, he would obviously want her on his side. A good point to make is 'why did Miller choose adultery as Proctor's sin?' Why not stealing or even murder? Both would be capable of causing the same moral dilemma and feeling of guilt, so why adultery. The answer is, because it fits in better with the events in Salem, and the fact that it could be caused only by a fit of desire on Proctor's part, there was no chance of it happening 'accidentally'. This adds many complications to Proctor's dilemma, one being that the whole fraud-based witch trials are centred around Abby, with whom John had his affair. It also provides good ground for juxtapositoning on Miller's part, as he can set Abby 'against' Elizabeth in Proctor's mind. ...read more.

Conclusion

To show any sort of positive moral outcome, it is not the confession, or even the sin committed that is of interest - it is whether or not Proctor comes to accept it, and take his punishment as it comes. The true outcome of Proctor's journey is that in the end, he was courageous in dying, even though it was for something for which he was innocent. At the very end, when he knew what would happen to him, Proctor refused to publish a lie about himself, or admit to a sin he did not commit. This shows at least some remnant of pride was left, even after everything he had been through - and this is what saves him in the end. It makes him realise that John Proctor wasn't as evil as he had thought, that, like everyone else, he was a mixture, and now with absolutely nothing to hide. Possibly, this act may cancel out John's adultery, especially as there is a lot of confusion around what are actually 'evil acts', and what are just natural flaws and instincts. Elizabeth says right at the end of the play, "...He have his goodness now. God forbid I take it from him!.." This suggests goodness and reconciliation in Proctor's act, as the once shallow and indecisive John, is finally decisive. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the relationship between John Proctor and Abigail Williams and how Arthur Miller presents ...

    4 star(s)

    Proctor has already told the court the goodness of his wife Elizabeth and her inability to lie. Danforth asks "To your knowledge, has John Proctor ever committed the crime of lechery?...Is your husband a lecher?" Elizabeth replies faintly, "No Sir."

  2. Discuss the role that grudges and rivalries play within The Crucible by Arthur Miller

    I'd almost forgot how strong you are, John Proctor!" From this quote the audience can connote the deep feelings that Abigail Williams has for John Proctor. Use of the word "forgot" shows the audience that Abigail Williams and John Proctor had a past life together.

  1. How and why does Arthur Miller encourage audience sympathy for John Proctor

    The atmosphere here was passionate, angry and lustful. This is a direct contrast to the start of act two, as Proctor talks with his wife, Elizabeth. The atmosphere is cold and formal. There is no chemistry between the two, and we begin to understand why Proctor was so tempted by Abigail.

  2. Is John Proctor a Good Man in Arthur Miller's Crucible?

    In this scene Proctor is shown to be a flawed man who allows his pride and fear get in the way of him doing the right thing just like in the McCarthy regime. The flaws show Proctor to not be a good man since he lets his guilt for his

  1. To what extent can John Proctor be described as a tragic hero in Arthur ...

    If Elizabeth was a cold, cruel woman and Abigail a pleasant harmless one, we would be able to sympathise with Proctor for his betrayal far easier. However, this is far from the case, consequently forcing us to side very much with Elizabeth, and preventing us identifying with proctor.

  2. Look at Miller's presentation of Abigail in 'The Crucible'. How realistic is his presentation ...

    The fact that Abigail's affair was with John Proctor (a moral and religious man of high standing amongst the other citizens of Salem) gives her more kudos than if it had been with another, more easily won, man. This is because he is described as being 'a sinner...against his own vision of decent conduct'.

  1. "Examine the changes that John Proctor and Reverend Hale go through as the play ...

    He shows the reader that it is not one's reputation that is important but standing up for what you believe is justifiable. Miller now wants the audience to realise that Hale is now showing his experience in his field as he now attempts to do the right thing.

  2. How effective are the closing scenes in the play at resolving the conflict presented ...

    He also seemed pleased to help with the Salem witch-hunt as he finally has the chance to show his skills. Due to his reputation he believes that he is better than everyone else and in a way their saviour pray you someone take these (page 30) backs up the point.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work