Examine three different ghost stories; how successfully have the authors involved the readers in their story? Which story seems to make the best use of suspense?

Authors Avatar
English Coursework

Examine three different ghost stories; how successfully have the authors involved the readers in their story? Which story seems to make the best use of suspense?

The three ghost stories that we have examined are 'The Signalman', 'Turn of the screw' and 'The Girl I Left Behind Me'. 'The Signalman' is a short story written in 1866 by Charles Dickens. 'Turn Of The Screw' is a novella written in 1898 by Henry James. 'The Girl I Left Behind Me' is another short story written in 1957 by Muriel Spark.

There are two characters in 'The Signalman', himself and the narrator. The narrator meets the Signalman at a railway cutting and is strangely received by the Signalman. The narrator returns the next day to here the Signalman's story. The Signalman tells him of the haunting that he has been experiencing recently at the cutting. The spectres seemed to foretelling a tragedy that is going to occur. Previous prophesies have turned out when a woman dies at the cutting and it is just time before the Signalman's death comes just as predicted.

The Signalman is articulate in that he explains everything clearly. For example he describes things in such clear detail it was as if he were commentating on it. One example is on page 172 the paragraph beginning, 'One moonlight night,' he goes on in such detail- '...and (I) saw this someone else standing by the red light... waving as I just now showed you. The voice seemed hoarse with shouting...'. I think that a certain amount of this involves the reader well because if there isn't any descriptive detail the reader doesn't feel part of the plot. Too much however can slow down the plot and the reader can feel that they are getting bored and bogged down in unnecessary detail.

He has been educated well but has fallen in society to a lowlier job. The narrator tells us this three quarters of the way down page 264, 'He had also worked at fractions and decimals, and tried a little algebra'.

The narrator has been recovering from an illness and it tells us this at the beginning. He is a gentleman, articulate, reliable, intelligent and ready to listen but there is a rather strange element of puzzle about the narrator.

It is written cleverly in a slightly poetic language, for example the chiasmus in the first paragraph. Even though there is some ambiguity and disorientation in the story.

It is mainly informative dialogue. It is based around the railway line and cutting. It is a very atmospheric environment, it's isolated, dank, claustrophobic and shadowed. We are given vivid descriptions of the box describing the levers and bell etc. A clear, sharp image makes it more shocking. The setting creates suspense and also the fact that we are told very little about each of the characters. It uses a very immediate start without giving an introduction, which may be boring to read and put the reader off.
Join now!


Dickens had been recently in a train crash when he wrote this and the readers will know this so it in a way adds an air of mystery and 'this could happen to me' feeling about it.

Dickens involves the reader by using vivid language well. For example the beginning where Dickens gives a description of the cutting so that it almost makes you shiver, 'He was a dark sallow man, with a dark beard and rather heavy eyebrows...dripping-wet wall of jagged stone... crooked prolongation of this great dungeon'. Dickens uses zigzag and crooked a lot, this ...

This is a preview of the whole essay