• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain what happens in Act 3 and show how Arthur Miller makes it clear to the audience that Danforth is not only misguided but deliberately ignores any evidence that casts doubt on stories of Abigail Williams and the other Girls.

Extracts from this document...


G.C.S.E. English Literature Coursework Assignment: The Crucible Explain what happens in Act 3 and show how Arthur Miller makes it clear to the audience that Danforth is not only misguided but deliberately ignores any evidence that casts doubt on stories of Abigail Williams and the other Girls. In Act Three, Arthur Miller presents to the audience the main climax of the play. He writes about Danforth and how he manipulates the court and the evidence given to him to stop it from ruining his reputation. He ends up forcing Elizabeth Proctor to lie about John Proctor's affair with Abigail Williams, resulting in Proctor being sentenced to death (hanging). Danforth is first introduced into the play by Miller during Act Two when Elizabeth tells Proctor that the Deputy Governor of the Provence (Danforth) is coming from Boston to judge the trials. This is the first sign that Miller shows to the audience about how serious the trials are. The position of Deputy Governor is the third most powerful in the court (King being first, then Governor). This shows that Danforth will play a serious part in the future of Salem's inhabitants due to the amount of power he holds. ...read more.


Danforth then says that he will have to charge him with contempt of the court but Giles replies he can't as it was a hearing, not a trial. Danforth becomes very angry and call the court into full session. Mr Hale tries to encourage Danforth to stop what he is doing but Danforth is determined not to listen to anybody and has Giles arrested for contempt of the court. Proctor tells Giles he will be free when Mary makes her statement and Proctor introduces Mary into the situation. Before this happens, Hale tries to convince Danforth that because this charge goes to the very heart of the court, Proctor should have a lawyer, not continue the trial alone. Danforth begins to become impatient and asks whether Hale has any doubt on whether his justice is fair. Danforth could be asking this to make clear to everybody in the court room that he is being a fair judge and nothing else, not trying to get Proctor to give away key facts that he can use which a lawyer would not. From here Danforth calls for Abigail and the girls to be brought in he begins to question Mary, whether she was threatened by Proctor to sign the deposition and say she 'never saw no spirits'. ...read more.


There is no hope anymore. Danforth orders from there for Proctor and Corey to be take to jail. As can be seen throughout Act Three, Danforth has been playing with everybody and their words. He used them to gain information that would help him and at one point this nearly fails. That point was when he found out that there was dancing in the forests. From that point when Hathorne introduced Mary's fainting incidences, he played dirty and ended up using Elizabeth against Proctor. Forcing her to say her husband was not unfaithful. Even though he knew this was not true, he knew it was enough evidence to retain his reputation. After this Abigail made it worse and Danforth went along with her. Mary turned back to Abigail and left Proctor the only one to blame and so Danforth accused Proctor of making compact with the Lucifer and forcing Mary into making her statement and signing the deposition. Overall, Danforth is a judge who makes a mistake in the beginning who refuses to take the fall for it so he brings Proctor down instead by deliberately ignoring the evidence right in front of his face. This whole act was structured by Miller to create the scene where Danforth uses Elizabeth to create false evidence against Proctor. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the relationship between John Proctor and Abigail Williams and how Arthur Miller presents ...

    4 star(s)

    Elizabeth is careful not to displease her husband and John is careful in his manner to Elizabeth. Elizabeth is afraid of what she must discuss with her husband but it is necessary that she does. She asks John if he went to Salem today.

  2. By What means does Miller create a sense of Expectations within his audience in ...

    However, Eddie's wholeness was at the expense of his own family and eventually himself. He only escaped restraint because he escaped consideration of other people or the community at large. Eddie's wholeness is a whole interest in his own life.

  1. This Essay is Discussing Whether Abigail Williams was a Victim or an Aggressor in ...

    Another example of her different tones is when in the courthouse she leads the girls to pretend that there is a bird attacking her. She has to talk in important and loud tones so that the other girls will lead her and so that the other people in the courthouse will hear her and take notice of her.

  2. The Crucible - What is there about Salem society which allows the girls' stories ...

    "Some time before, his wife's brother-in-law, James Bayley, had been turned down as a minister of Salem." Act One (an overture) As a result of this Putnam would have been against Parris and would not have supported him therefore it is not surprising that Putnam tells Parris to admit to

  1. The Crucible Act 3

    "Is every defence an attack against the court?" Here is another sign of Hale picking the side of Proctor, Giles and Francis rather then sticking loyally with the court to which he usually stands by. Key part in seeing how the court really works in Salem is after Giles submits

  2. The Crucible - analysing acts 3 and 4.

    It is now six months later and autumn, though the American term 'fall', used by Miller, seems far more suitable considering where we have now come to in the play As well as the darkness of the setting, we are struck by the emptiness of the room.

  1. Create an outright contrast between the two protagonists - Abigail Williams and Elizabeth Proctor. ...

    Maybe if Elizabeth had not have been so cold and uptight and slightly more warm and passionate John might not of been tempted by a younger more exciting girl? Miller deliberately makes Elizabeth and Abigail the two possible extremes of a female character so it makes it harder for Proctor to choose who he will go with.

  2. How and why does Arthur Miller encourage audience sympathy for John Proctor

    When Proctor arrives, he immediately is disbelieving of the witchcraft rumours. The other characters respect and admire him, Putnam hates him, Abigail is in love with him and the other girls fear him, but at the same time are in awe of him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work