Frankenstein has been described as a 'novel of the Gothic genre' do you feel this adequately describes the novel?

Authors Avatar

Frankenstein has been described as a 'novel of the Gothic genre' do you feel this adequately describes the novel?

Frankenstein does correspond with the many conventions of the Gothic genre however the traditional term 'Gothic novel' does not adequately describe this text. This essay will explore the many underlying themes and ideas of Frankenstein that make it more than simply, just a 'Gothic novel'. Frankenstein was written by Shelley at the age of 18 in 1818, a period when the Gothic genre was fully established. The term Gothic is usually associated with things that can be described as 'medieval' or 'uncouth'. Some traditional Gothic novels that comply to these descriptions are: 'The Monk', 'The Mysteries of Uldolpho' and ' The Castle of Otranto.' Standard Gothic novels are also very melodramatic with their tone and follow certain generic conventions of the Gothic genre and themes such as: the supernatural, the pursued protagonist, distressed heroine, fallen hero etc. The traditional Gothic genre novel does not venture beyond these conventions.

 

Knowledge and education are major themes in Frankenstein, all the main characters seem to have a thirst for knowledge. The novel starts with Walton writing letters to his sister;' I shall satiate my ardent curiosity with the sight of a part of the world never visited, and may tread a land never before imprinted by the foot of man.' Walton's passion for venturing into the unknown and learning presents the idea that exploring is thrilling, therefore setting the tone for the rest of the novel. Victor has a craving for knowledge; 'From this day natural philosophy, and particularly chemistry...became nearly my sole occupation.' This suggests that Victor has a dedication to learning, he is always questioning and his ambition to take ideas further is extremely risky. Victors obsession with knowledge can be linked to the theme of light and fire; '... my imagination was too much exalted by my first success to permit me to doubt of my ability to give life.... It was with these feelings that I began the creation of a human being.' This expresses the idea that knowledge can be compared to light and excitement, however Victor takes the excessive power he gains too far, creating something hostile and dangerous which is associated with fire. Victor's character highlights the fact that Frankenstein is more than a simple Gothic genre novel; his level of intellect and passion for learning leading to such misery is not typically explored in traditional Gothic novels. Furthermore, in the 1800s British society was still under heavy influence of religion and morals which was reflected in the characters in Gothic novels. Therefore, it is unusual for any of the characters to express enthusiasm for knowledge rather than for their religion.

Join now!

Victor introduces a conflict between science and religion as he decides to create and design the monster; 'A new species would bless me as its creator and source... No father could claim the gratitude of his child so completely as I should deserve theirs.' This conveys the idea that Victor is playing God as he attempts to create life using scientific knowledge. The theme of science is not often found in Gothic novels, however the idea of the supernatural found in Gothic novels can be related to the mystery of how exactly the monster was created as there are ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

I feel through arguing against the question, there is a lack of structure in the essay. There is no counter argument other than the text is more than a gothic text, so it's hard to collect ideas. If the essay agreed with the quote, then paragraphs looking at individual concepts of gothic would suffice. Here, they have looked at themes, and I feel there is a lack of coherence because of it. The paragraphs are well signposted, but I just feel there is a slight loss of focus on the question. This essay just seems to be a collection of themes and analysis, which is good if brought together to form an argument. I liked how this essay had a strong critical voice, and this is rare from a GCSE student. Being able to craft an argument needs to be worked upon, however.

The analysis here is good. There is a strong knowledge of the novel here, and this is evident through the large number of quotes used. Language is sometimes analysed well, looking at the connotations and effects of Shelley's writing. For example "Victor describing it as a 'solitary chamber, or rather cell' gives the impression of the unpleasant conditions" shows the ability to do this. I would've liked to have seen this sort of analysis with more quotes, as this essay tends to retell the story rather than analyse. Examiners don't want to see a simple narration of the plot, as this doesn't show any analytical ability. I would've liked to have seen this essay write about Shelley's constructions, rather than saying things happen. "Victor introduces a conflict between science and religion" is an obvious example of this. You shouldn't be writing as if the characters are real or making decision, as it only inhibits your ability to discuss why Shelley chooses to construct her novel in this way. It is evident here, as this essay tends to explain what quotes mean, rather than look at how the techniques shape meanings, and beyond that shape the genre of gothic. I was slightly confused how this essay was arguing it isn't a gothic novel when so often they say "this is commonly used in novels of the Gothic genre". I particularly liked the use of critical interpretations here, as these are looked strongly upon at A-Level, let alone GCSE. Strengthening an argument with interpretations such as "Bertrand Evans points out that the hero in the Gothic novel is consistently weaker than the antagonist" will gain credit.

This essay engages well with the task, and I liked how they weren't afraid to take argument with the question and disagree with the quote. I've read many examiners reports and so often do they say that the best candidates decide to disagree with the question, as their argument isn't forced and is always focused on the task, rather than trying to superimpose an essay they've practiced before. However, I do feel some of the discussions here are a bit basic. For example, arguing that the gothic genre is restricted to its conventions is naive, and to argue that Frankenstein isn't a gothic story as it's more than a ghost story is poor. This is a difficult task, and gothic is an area which is further explored at A-Level, but I still believe at GCSE there should be some awareness that a gothic text must not tick all the boxes. It is worrying how there is a focus on the word 'simply' yet there is no evidence that this was in the quote. Be careful that you don't answer a question that's not there!