How does Arthur Miller show in "The Crucible" that SalemSociety has the capacity for what started as "just dancin' in the woods" to end with the deaths of innocent people?

Authors Avatar

How does Arthur Miller show in “The Crucible” that Salem Society has the capacity for what started as “just dancin’ in the woods” to end with the deaths of innocent people?

        Throughout “The Crucible”, Arthur Miller draws many comparisons to the infamous McCarthy era of the 1940’s and 50’s, and the frantic “witch hunts” for communists. The “guilty until proven innocent” stance which is adopted by Danforth displays the harsh reality that we witnessed in the McCarthy era, as countless writers were blacklisted for being “communist sympathisers” even if they didn’t admit. The importance of reputations, as well as a lack of integrity prevails as catalysts in both eras, and the results, while not being as drastic in the McCarthy period, are similar.

         The title “The Crucible” makes the audience think of something that is heated up to remove any impurities in the substance inside it. This corresponds directly to the situation in Salem. The town is the crucible, and the people are the material inside it. They are purified by the witchcraft trials, as all of the problems that had existed in the village were brought to the surface, and were dealt with, one way or the other. This is ironic, as the trials, which were corrupt themselves, managed to purify many people, albeit in an unconventional way.  

Abigail, Parris, Putnam and Danforth are the primary symbols of the corruption and greed in Salem and they manipulate the fear of the supernatural and the pressure of being seen as a good Christian. Being a theocracy, fear of God, the devil and the supernatural in general is something that haunts the minds of many of Salem’s inhabitants. These covetous individuals exploit the innocent peoples’ fears in court, with no regard for those on the receiving end of the accusations. They accuse anyone they have to, as long as they gain, either security with Parris, land and money with Putnam, justification of rulings with Danforth, or the love John Proctor with Abigail. Once in court the accused person is in a dilemma, with nowhere to turn without some loss, whether it be life or reputation. Although at the beginning it represents a just system, the court slowly stoops to the level of the men who supposedly bring the chance of a fair hearing to the villagers. Its senior figure, Danforth depicts perfectly how the town was brought to shambles by some old grudges and petty grievances, which were “swept under the carpet” and ignored. Proctor comments on this when he declares, “all our old pretence is ripped away…we are only what we always were, but naked now.” Danforth is initially portrayed as a fair judge, but he slowly deteriorates, his pride and stubbornness prevailing at the crucial point of the play, as he states, “A person is either with this court or against it.” After Elizabeth’s denial of Proctor committing lechery, Danforth refuses to accept the withdrawal of her answer. “She has spoken. Remove her!” These words give the impression that he is unwilling to listen to anyone who contradicts or challenges his justice, even though he probably knows he is wrong. Rather than admit to making mistakes, he would let more innocent people die to protect his position and maintain the respect he demands from everyone. This lack of integrity and humbleness is a direct contrast with Hale, who rightly asks, “Is every defence an attack upon this court?” and Proctor, whose character strengthens as we progress through the play. This again displays the importance of reputation and status to the people of this time, as does the accusation of Abigail by Parris, “Your name in the town – it is entirely white is it not?” This prompts a sharp denial from Abigail, as her guilty conscience momentarily takes control. Even though it would appear Parris is questioning Abigail’s name in the village, his other motives could be to safeguard himself from any possible repercussions, as he is responsible for her actions. There are men like Proctor, however, who are humble enough to face their flaws and do their utmost to repair any damage they have caused, even if they take a long time to get there and, in the case of Proctor, lose their life. What is ironic is that most of these people should represent hope to the community as priests, judges and respected figures of high status.

Join now!

Interestingly, the original motives of these people, especially Abigail, aren’t as heinous as one would imagine, because some of them have mitigating factors. Abigail’s yearning for John Proctor’s love wouldn’t appear to be such a crime, but she completely disregards any consequences in her bid to reclaim Proctor as her own. Convicting others doesn’t appear to affect her at all, just as long as she gets her way. She isn’t afraid to betray her friends either, as she and Mercy Lewis accuse Mary Warren of committing black arts, and sending out a cold wind to them. She points the finger ...

This is a preview of the whole essay