How does j.b priestly capture and retain the audience's interest throughout the play.

Authors Avatar

How does j.b priestly capture and retain the audience’s interest throughout the play.

Introduction

The wonderfully constructed play of “An Inspector Calls” is a play by the late J.b Priestly, which was written when the Second World War was coming to a close but was published two years later in 1947 straight after the Second World War. The actual play was set in 1912 just before the Great War (world war one) a war, which stole the lives of a whole generation of men. The play dealt with many issues such as moralities and responsibilities for each human. One of the messages it delivered was we are all responsible for one and other and if as people we don’t take responsibility for our actions then it will be an outbreak into another world (referring to the previous world wars).

J.b Priestly captures our interest at the start of the play by giving us various hints that things aren’t as cozy as they seem. We first learn things aren’t right at the Burling household when Mr Burling shows his naivety when he is handing out advice to Gerald; he seems somewhat of a visionary as he says only good can happen and the world can only progress he feels that the inevitable war won’t happen and the titanic wont sink. Evidence that shows this is given in the words.

 “Germans don’t want war, nobody want’s war” “In a year or two we’ll have aero planes that will be able to go anywhere. The Titanic she sails next week, New York in 5 days unsinkable absolutely unsinkable.”

This piece of evidence shows that you shouldn’t trust Mr Burling and that he is both arrogant and ignorant.

Another way in which J.b Priestly keeps the audience interested at the start of the play is, when the audience feels the tension building up between Gerald and Sheila every time there is a mention of last summer, a summer in which Gerald avoided Sheila. This tension between Sheila and Gerald makes the audience suspect something is not right.  

 

Priestly uses quite an effective method to keep the audience interested when he slowly reveals each member of the Burling family and Gerald’s deepest darkest secrets. We learn one by one what each member of the family’s involvement with the girl Eva smith was and this method keeps the audience curious and eager to learn more. The first person the inspector questioned about Eva’s death was Mr Burling he sacked Eva as she wanted a pay rise this left Eva jobless, but Mr burling refused to take any responsibility for the girls suicide. The evidence of this is given in the words.

Join now!

“She’d had a lot to say-far too much-she had to go.”

The second person to be questioned was Sheila she made a complaint about Eva when she finally found a new job, this complaint got Eva sacked Sheila felt guilty and responsible for the suicide of the girl. The evidence which shows Sheila felt guilty us given in the words.

I felt rotten about it at the time and now I feel a lot worse.”

The next person to be questioned was Gerald he helped Eva until he fulfilled his lust. After being questioned Gerald is genuinely ...

This is a preview of the whole essay