• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective is The Crucible's use of a 17th century context and witchcraft as a satire on 1950s McCarthyism?

Extracts from this document...


How effective is The Crucible's use of a 17th century context and witchcraft as a satire on 1950s McCarthyism? The Crucible uses fear of witchcraft in the America of the 1600s as a metaphor for the fear of communism that was widespread in America in the 1950s. Arthur Miller wished to show that the attitudes and behaviour of the villagers of Salem were as irrational and ill-founded as the attitude and behaviour of the committee chaired by Senator McCarthy. Essentially Miller uses the 17th century setting to provide critical distance between the events described and the emotions that they aroused. After three hundred years everyone understands that witchcraft was never a threat to society and we can look at the way people behaved fairly sensibly. The Crucible argues that communism is not a threat to American society, but that the irrational behaviour and injustice that fear of it causes is very dangerous indeed. The Crucible is thus an attack on the anticommunist powers within 1950s America but its setting in the 1690s allows Miller to be much more forthright than if he had written a contemporary play. ...read more.


However, as others observe the children pointing the finger of suspicion, they too start to accuse their neighbours of witchcraft as a way of taking revenge or for personal gain: "...if Jacobs hangs for a witch he forfeit up his property- that's law! And there is none but Putnam with the coin to buy so great a piece." Miller uses incidents like this as a way of showing, without too much risk to himself, that this is what the committee chaired by Senator McCarthy, the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) and the communist paranoia were doing - people were using it to increase their power and for revenge. The best example of this in the 50s is the Hollywood Blacklist. Celebrities of the time would accuse other celebrities of communist activities in order to prevent their own implication. Charlie Chaplain left America to avoid this, for instance, and many other artists were forced to work using 'front-men' to stay in work. Miller's main target was, of course, McCarthy as he was responsible for most of the extreme activity. ...read more.


I confess to God and God has seen my name on this! It is enough." The court's use of pressure to try to get a confession from John Proctor is Miller's way of suggesting that corrupt methods were also used to get confessions from the people accused of communism. Miller's use of a flawed hero represents a message to others who would wish to stand up against the anticommunist witch-hunt. John Proctor is an adulterer but he has enough integrity to regret his sins and even admit them in public in order to resist Abigail's power. This suggests that you do not have to be perfect to resist McCarthyism, and that it is better to admit your faults than to lose your integrity. The Crucible works effectively as a satire on McCarthyism for the reasons outlined above, but it would not be quite so effective if it didn't work as a play. It is a powerful drama with interesting characters trapped in a difficult situation, first and foremost. Otherwise we would not be reading it today after communism itself has collapsed. Miller's final point is that there are always witch-hunts when it is necessary for people to stand up against mass hysteria and moral panic ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. The Crucible - summary.

    Proctor says that he cannot mount the gibbet as a saint, for it is a fraud. Elizabeth says that she has her own sins, for it is a cold wife who prompts lechery. Proctor states to Hathorne that he will confess himself, but he asks Elizabeth once again if it is evil.

  2. The Crucible - Power and Manipulation

    But the end justifies all means; because he did not prosecute the true villains (witches) and killed the innocent, the final suggestion and opinion may very well be that he abused his power entirely for his own self-esteem and ego.

  1. How does Miller use the concept of witchcraft for dramatic effect and to expose ...

    It does inflict dramatic impact and irony as John Proctor said his wife cannot lie and yet, she did and that backfired on him. Not only this but the judges had to introduce a third party, Elizabeth, because if they didn't, the judges response would be biased as they would

  2. To what extent can 'The Crucible' be viewed as a Classical Tragedy?

    Throughout the novel Abigail tries tempt John into recommencing his affair with her, believing that he still has feelings for her. With John, Abigail reveals a completely different side to her nature, though violent and domineering when interacting with the other girls, with John Abigail is sweet, a woman in love, 'John - I am waitin' for you every night'.

  1. Crucible confession

    be 'normal' and show what she really thinks and feels and not act like the people of Salem have pressured her to. All of these stage directions inform the audience of how the couple is feeling. The fact that the stage directions show in volume the thoughts and desires of

  2. The Crucible" is a play that was written by Arthur Miller in the 1950s

    For instance Abigail blames Tituba for making her laugh in the middle of prayer and for waking her in the night and Abi finds herself naked. Miller does this to give an insight of the sin Tituba is not given the chance to object or justify Abigail's accusations.

  1. 20th century drama- The Crucible

    This created a metaphorical distance between him and the rest of the district which Arthur Miller emphasised by the physical separation of his farm from the township. These factors although contributing to his social appearance also work against him. His distance from the town means they do not know much

  2. There is a clear parallel between the events of 1692 in Salem and the ...

    This statement shows us that in many situations like them in The Crucible, many people are scared of everything and everyone and many of them are unable to hide from the terror and the injustice, which could follow. These characteristics of such a timeless event in our history connect so

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work