• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How is act 3 of The Crucible Dramatically Effective?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How is act 3 of The Crucible Dramatically Effective? Since 1938 an organisation called the House Un-American Activities Committee had been in existence in America. This had the power to investigate any movement or person who apparently threatened the safety of the state. Under the chairmanship of Senator Joseph McCarthy, this committee became almost paranoid in its searching out of communist sympathisers amongst the American people in the late 1940s and early 1950s. In 1956, when the power of the committee was waning, Arthur Miller (The playwright) was summoned to appear before it. A pile of petitions with his signature was produced and he was asked to confess to signing his name. The activities of the Committee began to be linked in Miller's mind with witchcraft trials which had taken place in the American town of Salem two centuries before. For example the committee often had in its possession lists of people attending various communist meetings, and yet it still wanted the witnesses to name names. Miller saw these public confessions as parallel with the naming of names at Salem in 1692. In the15th century the Catholic Church began to take witchcraft seriously, and started to really crack down on its practice. ...read more.

Middle

"Mary Warren, do you witch her? I say to you, do you send your spirit out?" Danforth, Act 3, Page 87 When Danforth asks her this question Mary snaps and pushes herself away from Proctor. "Let me go Mr Proctor, I cannot, I cannot -" Mary Warren, Act 3, page 88 This is when Mary's delicate relationship with Proctor breaks down and she will no longer cover for him and put herself at risk from being accused by the rest of the girls. Abigail : (Looking about the air, clasping her arms about her as though cold): I - I know not. A wind, a cold wind, has come. (Her eyes fall on Mary Warren.) Mary : (Terrified, pleading): Abby! Mercy : (Shivering): Your Honour, I freeze! Proctor : They're pretending! Hathorne : (Touching Abigail's hand): She is cold Your Honour, touch her! Mercy : (Through chattered teeth ): Mary, Do you send this shadow on me? Act 3, Page 87 This is when the girls first start to turn on Mary, she is a very fragile person and when they start to turn on her she doesn't know what to do. She was used to pointing the finger of accusation not having it pointed at her and on her own she can't cope. ...read more.

Conclusion

Act 3 is relevant to the play as a whole because it is the Act where a lot of important things happen and it is the most dramatic, with a lot of tension and anger between different characters. It is what the first two acts have been building up to and you could say it is the climax of the whole play. When Arthur Miller wrote the play, "The Crucible" in 1953 the contemporary audience could relate to the play due to the media coverage that was occurring at the time. This era was concerned with the political movement of communism; the McCarthy trials. The contemporary audience saw Miller's play as relevant because of the effects of mass hysteria- the destruction of the community in Salem. Miller felt that the play had relevance although he didn't write it for that. The reason why the crucible is still so widely liked even though the witch trials are long gone is because it demonstrates the terrible effects of mass hysteria and what it can do to normally rational people. The story reminds its readers of an ugly blemish on human history. It reminds us that man is not perfect, and that we can make mistakes. However, even with these mistakes, we can cleanse ourselves and purify ourselves by making right what is wrong. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Examine miller's presentation of the marriage of John and Elizabeth proctor in the crucible. ...

    Throughout the play, John Proctor changes from being a troubled, self-exiled, sinner to becoming a person of high moral standards. Proctor exemplifies the importance of a strong name through his actions and choices throughout the play; most significantly the fourth act when he chose death over disgracing his name.

  2. The Crucible - analysing acts 3 and 4.

    God forbid I take it from him!" In this key moment Danforth shows that his greatest interest is to protect the reputation of the court when he prompts Proctor to sign a confession, thus preventing the response of his death. I think that Danforth has changed internally but not externally.

  1. The Crucible - summary.

    obvious falsehood, yet the court accepts it as truth because they have established that such evidence is irrefutable proof. The chapter culminates to encompass two central ironies. The first of these is that, to prove his own innocence and prove himself faithful to his wife, John Proctor must publicly declare his infidelity.

  2. In Act 3 of 'The Crucible', how are Dramatic Devices and Events Used by ...

    Parris himself, like Putnam, is using the trials for personal gain, under the cover of righteousness, because if the court falls apart, he will lose his reputation and probably his occupation as reverend, so he strives to uphold it, even if it results in the death of innocents.

  1. Focusing on Act 3, to what extent is 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller an ...

    The purpose of writing 'The Crucible' was so that Miller can show what happened in the courtroom and convey how the authorities pressurised and questioned the people on trial and also to show what happened during the McCarthyism period. The first way the extent to which this courtroom scene presents

  2. Exploration of the ways in which Miller dramatically presents the changing nature of John ...

    In an odd way, then, The Crucible is best read outside its historical context-not as a perfect allegory for anti-Communism, or as a faithful account of the Salem trials, but as a powerful and timeless depiction of how intolerance and hysteria can intersect and tear a community apart.

  1. Explore key moments of tension within Act 2 and 3 of "The Crucible". How ...

    Her short responses reveal an uneasy situation where both characters do not feel comfortable or relaxed with one another. The uncomfortable environment creates an image of depression which augments the relationship's tension. Miller creates a depressing atmosphere in his description of the Proctors' house being "low, dark and rather long."

  2. In What Ways Has Arthur Miller Made Act Three Of The Crucible So Dramatically ...

    (Act Three, page 96), this is tense because John is usually quite religious so this becomes a surprise to the audience. All these moments build up to the climatic ending of the court session. They all leave the audience questions which will be answered further on in the play, wanting

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work