How justified was the murder of Caesar?

Authors Avatar

From your reading of the play, how justified was the murder of Caesar?

Intro

Brutus

Cassius

The other conspirators/ General reasons

Conclusion

Intro

Shakespeare’s tragedy is mainly based on the assassination of Caesar.

Right from the beginning of the play, the people of Rome are divided into two sides: the pro-Caesar against the pro-Pompey. On one side, he is seen as a glorious war hero (“rejoice in his triumphs”) by his supporters including the crowd, whereas on the other side, his enemies/opponents such as Murellus and Flavius believe he is a tyrant whose aim is to use his supreme power to establish a new monarchy with himself as the emperor who would “soar above the view of men – And keep us all in servile fearfulness”.

Apart from Brutus whose convictions are honourable, the conspirators all seem to have personal interests - denunciated more or less explicitly - in murdering Caesar, namely as they will share power after his death.

Brutus

Because of his integrity (“I love - the name of honour more than I fear death”) and noble reputation as “the soul of Rome” who “sits high in all the people’s hearts”, Brutus’s support is essential to the conspirators in order not to be accused of self-interest in killing Caesar.

Join now!

Previously a supporter of Pompey, he was pardoned and became a close friend of Caesar (“Caesar’s angel” according to Antony), however he now sees Caesar as a threat to his Republican idealism.

Under Cassius’s pressure, it is finally in his soliloquy in Act 2 that he realises that “It must be by his death”. He believes so blindly in rational and logical argument that he does not understand Cassius manipulates him. As he claims himself: “Not that I loved Caesar less, - But that I loved Rome more.” he truly acts for the “General good” and has “no personal cause ...

This is a preview of the whole essay