• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

IN WHAT WAYS CAN THE AUDIENCE SEE THAT THE `THE CRUCIBLE`, BY ARTHUR MILLER, IS A PLAY WHICH IS ESSENTIALLY CONCERNED WITH THE SPIRITUAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CENTRAL CHARACTER JOHN PROCTOR

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In what ways can the audience see that the `The Crucible`, by Arthur Miller, is a play which is essentially concerned with the spiritual development of the central character John Proctor Crucible - 'a pot in which base metals are melted down in order to purify them separating out base elements', this is how Arthur Miller was inspired to write the play about the Salem witch trials. The play shows people in Salem and how the jealousy turns out to be inferior, in other words how the witch craft trials started and how it got worse. 1692 was the year of the witch trials and many lives, or should I say innocent lives were lost based on accusations made by a small number of silly teenage girls; the ring leader of these so call girls was Abigail Williams. The Salem witch trials tried to distinguish the good from the evil. If you were suspected of witchcraft, then immediate action would take place, first arrested and then questioned. Any evidence that was used, usually intangible -was then word of mouth. If you were found guilty then you were hung. Also the play is comparable to McCarthyism in 1950, where exactly the same type of trials were taking place but to identify communism taking place, just like the witch trials you were taken for questioning and even in the 20th century word of mouth was taken as evidence. ...read more.

Middle

The point being made is that John knows it is his fault and the consequence of it is he won't let go of her because he knows the truth about the arrest. He is reassuring her that nothing is going to happen to her. 'You will not go!' (Act 2 pg 63) Proctor knows that this is all a mistake but knowing it is his. Proctor argues with Mr Cheever that she is innocent and the courts are wrong. Proctor is running out of options he will do anything, even confess about his relationship to get her back. John knows that he is the only one to save his wife and he told her so. For this reason, John is a man of his word. In the previous Act he said 'I will bring you home' (Act 2 pg 63). We have known John to be a man of his word when he says to Abigail that he will cut off his hand and that he will bring Elizabeth back. He stopped what he said before, subsequently he is going to bring Elizabeth back knowing what he said to his wife, he knows Elizabeth has faith in him 'Oh, John, bring me soon!' (Act 2 pg 63). So John has to prove to the judge that his wife is innocent and Abigail accused her just to get John back so Elizabeth can't have him. ...read more.

Conclusion

The decision he made was to stop everything bad and he won't go to hell because of what he has done. It makes John a good man, meaning his spiritual development is complete because he is dead and can't change anymore. John Proctor should have his shred of 'goodness' because he has been churning long enough in the crucible pot. John Proctor is ready and purified and is a good man. He is finally, as I have mentioned, put a full stop to further deaths, being hung for witchcraft. This fact as it was proved in the Milgram experiment- where people would take another person's life without giving a second thought and were told to go even further, until they would die, Proctor was that person and did not listen. Furthermore, John was a final seal and said no more names, deaths or accusations and they were stopped. The government in March 1712 after a solemn meeting declared a democracy in Salem. All were compensated with their land, money and a good name for beloved people who died tragically in the witch trials. The ways the audience see 'The Crucible', is concerned with spiritual development of John. He is linked to all key events in the play, and still Arthur Miller showed how a man changed and died to save a state, in order to save other people and the good name of Proctor. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Umer Hussain Essay- The Crucible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the relationship between John Proctor and Abigail Williams and how Arthur Miller presents ...

    4 star(s)

    He accuses Abigail of being a whore. Proctor confesses to the court his sin. "God help me, I lusted..." Danforth puts Proctor's accusations to the test by inviting Elizabeth into the court and asking her why she put Abigail out of her house.

  2. The Crucible - summary.

    shown by his reliance on what he grasps as indisputable evidence; like Pontius Pilate, to whom Proctor compares Hale, he wants to play only a passive role in the proceedings without any feeling of personal responsibility. Hale's growing disillusionment foreshadows his later repudiation of the court's actions.

  1. The Crucible by Arthur Miller - Abigail Williams - Character Study.

    Abigail has forged her way out of trouble and Betty has picked up on the plan, assured that she is safe from punishment and joins Abigail. They are now beyond accusation or danger and elated to call names out. Betty is following Abigail, but why should Abigail be continuing to call out names.

  2. Why Did Arthur Miller Call His Play 'The Crucible'?

    Later on, I thought she was impure because of what she did to get revenge on Goody Proctor because of her jealousy and because Proctor chose his wife over her. Miller makes Abigail say stuff like 'I will never hurt Betty' and 'Now Betty, dear'.

  1. 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller - Discuss the appeal of 'The Crucible' to its ...

    - ... She is a cold, snivelling woman, and you bend to her! (John) - Do you look for whippin'? (Act One p19) As John is now in a slightly unpleasant mood, he threatens Abigail with a whipping if she continues to discriminate against his wife.

  2. By What means does Miller create a sense of Expectations within his audience in ...

    stiff, the chair raised like a weapon above Eddies head-and he Transforms what might appear like a flare of warning into a smile of triumph, and Eddies grin vanishes and he absorbs his look.' To the audience Marco's look is warning Eddie Marco is wary of Eddie now and will protect Rodolfo as best he can.

  1. Focusing on Act 3, to what extent is 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller an ...

    The good people are helpless and without power so they have no say for example Nurse Rebecca. In the town of Salem authority is a virtue. The final way in which act 3 can be interpreted as an attack on the severity of the authorities is by Arthur Miller's personal experience.

  2. "The Crucible" Essay

    does very much the opposite of what every assumed she would do. We see here that Proctors wellbeing is more important to her than moral goodness - in this case her reputable honesty. When Elizabeth leaves the court, pandemonium stirs inside the courtroom as Hale relentlessly pleads Proctors case to be true.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work