• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Mrs Turner Cutting The Grass & The Purple Pileus Comparison - Both Stories Concentrate on How People Appear To Others. Discuss The Way Each Writer Uses Comic Elements To Achieve A Serious Effect.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Wide Reading Mrs Turner Cutting The Grass & The Purple Pileus Comparison Both Stories Concentrate on How People Appear To Others. Discuss The Way Each Writer Uses Comic Elements To Achieve A Serious Effect. Both "The Purple Pileus" and "Mrs. Turner Cutting the grass" have many similarities, of which the most significant is the way both stories are concerned about how other people judge the appearances and values of the central characters. However, the authors differ, with regard to how they go about illustrating this theme to the reader. Carol Shield invites us to observe the process of pre-judgemental thoughts; she uses comedy to allow the reader to deride Mrs Turner's character, yet with a subtle twist, suggests that it is human nature to make snap judgments and possess negative prejudices about other people, but it's wrong. The devices she uses to achieve this are built within us; she manipulates our thought-process using subtle, light-hearted humour to make us form a negative view of Mrs Tuner, but then she exposes Mrs. Turner's history to us and that same comedy just doesn't seem funny anymore. For example, she provokes the other characters, such as The Sascher's and the High School girls to make these piss-taking judgements and, as readers we laugh with them, but in the end it is they who we see in a negative sense for being prejudiced. After we learn more about Mrs Turner's history, the humour the Professor uses isn't funny. She transforms the same negative view formed in the beginning into a positive one at the end, forcing the reader to agree by making us feel guilty about making the same prejudgements. This allows the reader to reflect on the contrast in the story and become aware of what Shields is trying to make us realise- that prejudices and snap judgements are wrong. In the end, we realise how easy it is to judge others unjustly and harshly, even though we are fully aware it's amoral. ...read more.

Middle

I will now propose to compare The Purple Pileus' bearing on the same theme of prejudice and stereotypes. Indeed, Wells implements the same form of comedy, inducing judgemental views from other characters to affect our supposition. Though, there is a distinct difference in objectives: HG Wells exploits our prejudices to reinforce our stereotypical views, whereas Shields challenges our prejudices. In "The Purple Pileus" the other characters views about the protagonist, Mr Coombes, are fundamental to how we view him. His wife is, to start with, severely derogatory, referring to him as, "a little grub" and treating him with hardly any respect whatsoever. The language she uses against him reduces him to a pathetic wimp who hesitates even to respond in like terms to his overpowering wife. At the time of HG Wells, this would have seemed hilarious as society was overwhelmingly patriarchal. The opening works in an offset way to "Mrs. Turner Cutting The Grass." Instead of trying to gain a little sympathy for the central character, Wells pours scorn over Mr Coombes and mocks his role as a man and husband. Action-wise, calling him a little grub is practically the only thing his wife says to him, suggesting that she cannot be bothered to speak to him at all, "The row had arisen about that beastly Jennie again." The fact that Mr Coombes is not even consulted about Jennie and Mr Clarence coming over to dinner highlights her total lack of respect for him. She obviously doesn't feel that he is a very strong willed man and appears to think that she can walk all over him. She doesn't notice, and certainly doesn't care, that he feels extremely uncomfortable at dinner in the presence of her friends. So whilst he, "sat dumb and wrathful at his own table," she "laughed aloud" with her friends completely ignoring her husband. Jennie, the "big, noisy girl" also treats her guest without much regard or consideration. ...read more.

Conclusion

The men in the story do not come off very well at all; she feels smothered by her father, Kiki leaves her with a new born baby, the professor is portrayed as judgmental and exploitive of Mrs Turner and only Gord seems to truly love her, yet it is a love she appears not to share. It is also a story that is used to show that we shouldn't judge other people, that just by looking at someone you cannot necessarily tell very much about their life. It is expressed that it doesn't matter if Mrs Turner doesn't understand the difference between a Shinto shrine and a Buddhist temple as, "She's having a grand old time." Wells tries to show that people have a lot of possibility inside of them and demonstrates that it might take something extraordinary for them to realise their potential, but that they should continue to strive for this. He shows that no one need be weak and let themselves be walked all over. He obviously has no respect for people who do so. Though, I do believe Wells is looking down his nose at his characters and feels superior to them, holding prejudices about class systems (we can see Coombes is a working-class man by his accent) that are exposed in his writing. Using comic ideas, both stories effectively convey the serious implications in the writing. As I have repeatedly mentioned, they achieve opposite ideas and thus make good literature for comparison. In summarising the two authors' ideas in the stories, I prefer Shields as she has produced a more eloquent literary piece and has shown to be capable of more using more elaborate devices in order to manipulate the reader, thus making our realisation that prejudices are wrong, more significant and understandable. Whereas, Wells has composed a simpler piece of writing with an opposite theme which I disapprove of, anyway, by principle. Wide Reading - English Cswk Piece 5/5 -- 01/05/07 Mussadiq Khan | 5, 768 | Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE H.G. Wells section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE H.G. Wells essays

  1. Humor, Irony and Effects in HG Wells' short stories.

    In "The Story of The Inexperienced Ghost" Wells uses numerous devices to convince the reader that Claytons story is not true. The reader is told right at the start of the story that "We naturally supposed he was lying". When Clayton explains how much he had drunk, Wells prompts the

  2. knowing and not knowing humour and iriony in H.G Wells' short stories

    He does not believe them even though they are standing round the fire to supposedly ward off evil spirits; this shows some of Wells' irony. Wells' choice of narrator creates a problem for him as a ghost story writer. He does not make it easy for himself to convey to

  1. Mystery stories- Pre 1914 prose

    St Clair wipes the make up off his face to reveal his true identity. This relieves the reader knowing he isn't dead and leaves the reader feeling content knowing who the deformed figure was. Tension is a common theme in all three stories because tension is what is needed in

  2. What is the effect of the juxtaposition of the ordinary and the extra-ordinary in ...

    Also the descriptions of the red weed that 'clambered over... the ruins' is highly unusual in itself. Not only does Wells make it sound like the red weed is alive by using personification, he uses the red colour of blood to describe how the weed looks; to make the weed

  1. Short Story discussion of

    This shows us that the raconteur has become irrational, and in a sense insane. We also see him trying to adopt a cheerful register as a means of coping with what he cannot explain: "'By Jove! Said I aloud; 'that draught's a strong one!'"

  2. This war has taught us pity - pity for those witless souls that ...

    The curate embodies the religious aspect of society. However, instead of acting as a helper and guide to the people, the curate rambles insensibly in a manner reminiscent of Old Testament preaching. He himself has lost his wits under the pressure of the Martian invasion and the narrator's comment parallels Wells' view in reality: "What good is religion if it collapses at calamity?"

  1. What is H.G. Wells trying to achieve with his novel The Time Machine? What ...

    The Time Traveller partakes a fruit feast with the Eloi, and explores the area around the structure, observing and making judgements about the nature of the future, which quickly are shown to be incorrect. When he is in the field next, he realizes that his machine has been moved; to where, he cannot figure out.

  2. Knowing and not knowing, humour and irony in the short stories of H.G. Wells

    We know the narrator is rude and mean due to how he insults the older people. 'I half suspected the old people were trying to enhance the spiritual terrors of their house by their droning insistence' he didn't say this to their faces but he thought this.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work