Much Ado About Nothing - Characterization of Hero

Authors Avatar
Characterization of Hero in Much Ado About Nothing "Much Ado About Nothing" is one of Shakespeare's most loved plays. This comedy about love, villainy, friendship, parent-child relationships, society and customs presents a rich ambiguous blend of life's relationships, folly and catastrophe. It is a play with two parallel plots given equal coverage and equal focus, one involving Hero and Claudio (the conventional, culturally acceptable lovers), the other involving Beatrice and Benedick (the outspoken, unconventional lovers). These two couples fall in love with each other during the play and decide to marry at the end. Then there is Don Pedro, Prince of Aragon, who assists in matching-up both couples. He comes to visit Leonato, the governor of Messina (Hero's father and Beatrice's uncle), after a battle against his bastard brother Don John who tries to take revenge by breaking up Hero and Claudio. Hero has a very dramatic role in this play. Although she seldom speaks, Hero is the source of much commotion,
Join now!
because Don John, the bastard, tries to frame her and her fiancé Claudio. He hatches a plot to convince Claudio, that Hero is unchaste. Because of that, the innocent Hero is accused at her wedding day, in front of the altar, of sleeping around. She gets so nervous and faints. Hero is  declared dead and can only awake when her innocence is  proven Everything turns out good at the end, and they get married. In the following I will characterize Hero, a beautiful (1/1,171), young woman (1/1,278), who is dark-haired (1/1,157), small (1/1,157), and described as a "jewel" (1/1,165), "a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

The Quality of Written Communication is poor, but not necessarily for the usual reasons. The candidate's spelling is fine, but their punctuation and grammar make it very hard to read this answer coherently. Furthermore, the candidate's method of quoting is pointless and misses opportunities for embedded quotes to be substituted into the text. The examiners love to see embedded quotes, as they help the fluidity of the writing style but with these random number references to an Act, Scene and page from an unspecified publication of the play, this answer just becomes bogged down.

The Level of Analysis is here is very superficial. There is a vague understanding of the context, but no great depths are ever ventured to and thus, this answer cannot hope to achieve much better than a low C grade. Contextual appreciation is imperative, particularly in Shakespearean plays as they were written so long ago under the influence of hugely different social and historical factors (such as the role of women in Shakespearean England). The candidate scratches the surface (commenting on Claudio and Hero's relationship being "conventional"), but the comments about Hero's character being "tragic" are simply erroneous. It is moments like these where candidates hoping to slip by with only half the text fully understood are shown up - the candidates must demonstrate a holistic understanding of all of the play, and must refrain from making remarks about characters which are entirely contradictory to the playwright's aims. Hero is an ironic character - her name alone is a contradiction as she is naturally very shy and subordinates to men easily. This shows she is the complete opposite of Beatrice (the candidate did note this, however) and does not challenge the conventional expectations of women in the society.

Discussing characters can be tricky for candidates, particularly if they have taken the risk to study only certain sections of the prescribed text instead of revise until the entire text is understood. In questions like these, candidates are expected to address the descriptions of the character - which can be limited in a play and so a number of different scenes and moments that help the playwright reveal the character to readers must be analysed. Scenes such as Hero's fainting at the alter are good sources of information about the character, so the candidate has done well to address this section and others, but this answer is extremely badly structured and therefore a lot of the effective analysis is diluted through bad expression/quoting strategies and a generally very poorly written response.