Reason, perception, emotion and language are all ways of knowing. Reason is defined as formal logic or knowledge that is gained through rationalism.

Authors Avatar

Reason, perception, emotion and language are all ways of knowing.  Reason is defined as formal logic or knowledge that is gained through rationalism.  Perception is an empirical inquiry gained through experience.  Emotion is a normative judgement that while language is comprehensive rationality.   Different ways of knowing affect different areas of knowledge, which are Mathematics, Human Sciences, Natural Sciences, Ethics, History and the Arts. Both are closely linked with one another.  For example, reasoning is the principle theory behind math, affecting the way in which one uses logic to reach answers in Mathematics.  Hence, if one does not understand the Mathematical problem, one will not be able to solve it.  Similarly, emotion is needed when painting on canvas or writing the lyrics to a song as it involves the expression of ones’ feelings.  Perception is often necessary as well because an artist uses his past experiences and forms his own ideas by observing his surroundings.  

Before we can evaluate the ways in which emotion enhances or undermines reasoning, we must have a clear definition of an emotion.  An emotion is a cognitive and/or a physiological response to a perceived stimulus while reason is any kind of cognitive activity.  There are a few problems in the analysis of an emotion.  One of them is the fact that we cannot be definite as to what counts as an emotion.  While certain passions are considered emotions, it is difficult to define what constitutes an emotion because there are feelings, like moods, which are long-term and do not fit into the usual “violent passion” definition of an emotion.  Emotions can also be viewed as both rational and irrational because they usually involve both logic ability and personal beliefs.  Another problem is that it is difficult to tell whether we control our emotions or whether our emotions control us.  Hence, whether an emotion undermines or enhances reasoning as a way of knowing is debatable, but I believe that it undermines reasoning more that it enhances it.

There are two theories of emotion that oppose each other: The James-Lange theory, and Schatcher’s Cognitive theory.  The first theory, the James-Lange theory, states that for an emotion, the body must first respond, and then one feels the emotion.  The two men who came up with this theory claimed that when we see a snake, our bodies first respond, we run and only then do we feel an emotion because the body has been aroused.  They arrived at this theory because they believed that just thinking about or seeing a snake has no real effect until after the body has responded.  Hence the physical feelings are the emotions.  James argued that the feel of an emotion – which, for him, equals the emotion itself - is only the perception of danger without the actual feeling of fear.  Due to the fact that the emotion is produced without cognitive reasoning but physiological responses, we can conclude that emotion can exist purely on its own without reason, hence undermining it.  

Join now!

The second theory, the Cannon-Bard theory, states that the bodily reaction and the emotional response to an event occur at the same time.  This theory came about after the discovery of the thalamus as a physical unit of the brain that can instantly transmit messages.  The theory claimed that when an emergency is perceived, both the bodily reaction and the emotional system respond at the same time.  Since we react by instinct, reasoning is not enhanced by emotion for there is no time for the mind to rationalize.  Both of these theories claim that emotions are immediate reflex responses to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay