• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Responsibility and Guilt in An Inspector Calls

Extracts from this document...


Responsibility and Guilt in An Inspector Calls 'An Inspector Calls' was written in 1945 by John Boynton Priestley. He was born on the 13th of September 1884 in Bradford, England. He died on the 14th August 1984 in Warwickshire and was widely respected as a great English writer and broadcaster. Priestley was born in a highly respectable suburb in Bradford. His father was a teacher and his mother died when he was young. He worked in the wool trade after he had left grammar school but had always had ambitions of being a writer and he became one when he reached the age of thirty. In much of his work he drew on memories of his time in Bradford after he had moved south. Priestley wrote more than fifty plays the most famous of which are, 'Dangerous Corners (1932)', 'When We Are Married (1938)', and 'An Inspector Calls (1945)'. His first major success though came with the novel 'The Good Companions' which earned him the James Tait Black Memorial Prize for fiction and made him a national figure. Many of his works have a political aspect. For example 'An Inspector Calls' contains many references to Socialism. He was also a founding member of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament in 1958. He declined lesser honours before accepting the Order of Merit in 1977. He married three times and had four daughters and one son. In 'An Inspector Calls' the main themes are status, love, power, guilt, responsibility, honesty and lies. The play is set in 1912 because it gives the audience a more dramatic impression of the differences between rich and poor. In 1912 the people were vastly socially divided. There were a lot of lower class people who were very poor and very few upper class rich people, a lot of the rich people disliked the working class and disrespected them. Among the political issues receiving the most attention at the time was the need to improve working conditions for the average English employee, and the question of voting for women. ...read more.


He is quick to suggest that Arthur is involved but he is slow to tell them why. The strange way that the Inspector goes about his business infuriates Mr Birling. The Inspector hints that he knows more than he's telling e.g. He implies that Sheila, Gerald and Eric also know something about Eva Smith and he also rarely answers questions precisely: "It might be" his business, he says. It turns out that Arthur Birling sacked Eva Smith from his factory due to his greed. She had asked Mr Birling for a pay rise from 22 shillings and 6 pence to 25 shillings. Then she went on strike with the other workers after he refused. He then sacked her after accusing her of being one of the four or five ringleaders. This shows that he doesn't think he should be responsible towards his workers and show them a bit of respect. Then Sheila got her sacked from her next job at a clothes shop called Milwards. Sheila went there one day in January and tried on a dress even though the shop assistants and her mother had suggested it wouldn't suit her. One of the shop assistants was Eva Smith and the dress suited her not Sheila as she was a pretty girl. When Eva smiled at another shop assistant, Sheila interpreted this as Eva saying: "Doesn't she look awful." This put Sheila into: "a furious temper" and she demanded that the girl be sacked. Despite this, Sheila feels guilty and is overcome by grief once the Inspector describes Eva's death. Sheila and Eric are on the side of Eva Smith when they here about her gruesome death. This is unlike their mother, father and Gerald, who show no sympathy whatsoever. Eric says Eva shouldn't have been sacked for showing a bit of: "spirit" and asking for higher wages. Sheila agrees with Eric that: "these girls aren't cheap labour, they're people." After Eva Smith got sacked from Milwards she changed her name to: "Daisy Renton". ...read more.


Eric says he's: "Ashamed of his parents", he tells his father he's: "not the kind of father a chap could go to when he's in trouble". He also has a real go at his mother: "you killed her - and the child she'd have had too - my child - your own grandchild." And he tells her she doesn't understand anything. When Gerald returns they start to wonder whether the Inspector was real because Gerald asked a policeman, who didn't know the Inspector, they also wondered if the pictures shown to each of them individually were the same or different pictures altogether. They find out that the Inspector doesn't exist by telephoning the police station and they phone the infirmary and it turns out that no girl died that night. But then the police ring. A girl has just died after swallowing some disinfectant. An Inspector is on his way... At the start of the play it appears to be a normal detective story but as the Inspector arrives about a suicide, the audience get to know the characters better and the story increases in complexity. As the Inspector interrogates each family member the story draws you in and it becomes more and more interesting with the Inspector slowly making the atmosphere more tense and full of suspense using responsibility and guilt. Priestley skilfully includes the themes of responsibility and guilt in the play; he does it in a manner that clearly informs the audience of his beliefs and cleverly tries to convert the audience to his way of thinking. He clearly does this in the Inspector's last speech: "the time will soon come when, if men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught it in fire, blood and anguish." Here Priestley refers to World War 1. He is trying to convey the point that we all work together and help each other to try and make the world a better happier place. ?? ?? ?? ?? Muslim Stevenson D6-TA ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE J.B. Priestley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE J.B. Priestley essays

  1. An Inspector Calls Director's Letter

    You do not yet know that this 'news' is something sinister so you should still seem happy, perhaps with the hint of an idea that is something that Sheila doesn't really want to know. Then, when you are told what has happened and when you say "Oh - how horrible..."

  2. "You and I aren't the same people who sat down together before dinner" Sheila ...

    the message that they are given by the Inspector in different ways. Sheila and Eric fully understand the idea that, as the Inspector says, "We all live as one body. We don't live alone� and unsuccessful try to persuade their parents of the merits of this arguments.

  1. Inspector calls

    This tells us about Birling's morality, and, by implication, about how much value he places upon people. Mr Birling's views are in profound contrast to that of the Inspectors. He is wedged between power and money and is immovable. Therefore his views are very capitalist, he does not believe in equality for all.

  2. An Exploration Of Generation Conflict In Act 3 Scene 5 Of An Inspector Calls

    Each member of the family has their own point of view and they start to engage in bitter recriminations, blaming each other aggressively. Arthur Birling regrets nothing. Birling wants to keep all the revelations in the family, he's terrified it'll be a "public scandal."


    She is shocked by Gerald's rundown of Alderman Meggarty and appalled to hear Sheila say that Eric drinks to an excessive amount. Even when Gerald admits to a drink problem, she still refuses to believe it later in the play.

  2. How does J.B Priestly explore the issues of social responsibility on 'An Inspector Calls'?

    All of these interrogations are emphasising social responsibility and so this use of tension in the play seems very important for Priestly to explore his moral issues. The inspector's final speech that to me appears as a conclusion to this storyline, addresses most of the aspects that Priestly has tried to portray through the course of the play.

  1. An Inspector Calls - How does the writer explore the themes of social responsibility, ...

    voices Priestly's own views, he sees the calling of the inspector as a call for reformation in Britain at that time. Mr Birling is a successful businessman in his mid-fifties. He is described by Priestly as 'heavy looking, rather portentous and rather provincial in his speech.'

  2. What does the study of words and actions of the Birling family tell you ...

    However, they all acted in very different ways. Mr Birling is a very proud but self-centered and ignorant business owner. "I was an alderman for years- and Lord mayor two years ago." He tries to win the inspector to his side in this way by offering him port and with talk about having been a mayor, playing golf

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work