Shylock: villain or victim?

Authors Avatar

Shylock: villain or victim?

By Katie Smith

The puzzling question of Shylock’s character can be viewed in several different ways. It could be said that he is a villain because he is a victim or that he is a victim because he is a villain. Whereas in fact Shakespeare's infamous Venetian goes from cunning villain to victim of historical injustice, as evidence of changing cultural attitudes. His role is a complex one. Shylock is at once a comic villain and a tragic victim. From one point of view, he is a caricature, a medieval Jewish stereotype, a greedy, callused usurer who cares for little besides money and doing harm to Christians.

In the twelfth century, Jews were despised. Expulsion from England was viewed as a good solution. During the Elizabethan period, Jews were allowed in England, but had an unpleasant reputation. Christians disliked Jews for their actions, such as usury. This is shown with Antonio and Shylock. Shakespeare begins the play with the audience believing Shylock to be a Jewish stereotype. But as the play develops, Shakespeare manipulates our views and emotions. The continuous switching between observing Shylock as a villain to observing him as a victim forces the audience into insecurity.

Join now!

At the beginning and throughout the play, Shylock is ridiculed and jeered at by Antonio and his Christian friends. Solerio and Solanio, two characters whose purpose in the play is give information and move the story along, constantly mock, torment and make fun of Shylock’s religion.

‘As the dog Jew did utter in the streets: My daughter! O my ducats! O my daughter!’

Solanio, Act II Scene VII

This quote is a fine example of the Christians somewhat unjustified behaviour towards Shylock where they judge him on the stereotypical view of Jews at the time and do not ...

This is a preview of the whole essay