• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

study of two romeo and juliet films comparison

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast the ways in which Baz Luhrmann and Franco Zeffirelli present Scene 1 of Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet' ? In this essay I will be comparing two film versions of the famous William Shakespeare play 'Romeo and Juliet'. 'Romeo and Juliet' is a romantic story about two star-crossed lovers whose families are at war with one another. The first film was made in 1968 and directed by Franco Zeffirelli; the second film that I shall be comparing it with was made more recently in 1997 and was directed by Baz Luhrmann. The main difference between the two films is the setting. In Franco Zeffirelli's version the film is set in Italy, in a village in Verona where the original play was set. Whereas Baz Luhrmann's film is set in Verona Beach a fictional place within Los Angeles. The other key difference between the two films is the time period the film is set in. Zeffirelli's film is set in the 17th century as was intended by Shakespeare; however Luhrmann's film is set in the modern era around the turn of the 21st century. A key contrast noticeable between the two films is the intended audience. ...read more.


This gives you the impression the Montagues are fun-loving, free spirits, who are at war with no-one. The Capulets on the other hand, are introduced with a far more sinister feel again due to the music, which is western/rock music. This immediately means we take a disliking to the more evil Capulets. Both films use some kind of music to show the power and importance of the Prince when he enters after the brawl. But again Zeffirelli uses the more traditional style whereas Luhrmann goes for modern, impacting music. On the Prince's entrance in Zeffirelli's version royal trumpets are played. This works in signifying that a powerful, important character has entered. There is no background music just the trumpeters alongside the Prince. They also play on his exit to create an effect of realism, as if it were a real Prince. However in Luhrmann's film the Prince's entrance is far more dramatic, it is very loud, emphatic, modern/classical music, similar to that played in the prologue. This also gives the impression that a powerful, important character is arriving but in far more exciting fashion. The contrast in music between the two films lessens towards the end of Scene 1. ...read more.


However before this Baz Luhrmann decides to have an extreme close-up of Tybalt's metal-heeled shoe grinding a match as he steps out of the car, this is also the cue for the western music, which all adds up to a very dramatic and sinister entrance for Tybalt. Zeffirelli doesn't do anything like this, as it wouldn't fit in with his aims, he just sticks to the traditional slow pan up the body. The film which I preferred was the more modern version by Baz Luhrmann. The reason for this being is that I preferred the music in it which was used to fantastic effect and very well thought out. Also it had that Hollywood slickness that only comes with a big budget. It was generally more exciting and engrossing probably because it was so different to your average traditional Shakespearean play. The modern slant on a timeless classic just gave it that edge. In conclusion I believe both films were successful in achieving what was intended. They both appeal to their target audiences. For the 1968 version the older, more traditional generation and for the 1997 version the younger, more action-hungry generation. Zeffirelli's film also showed that young actors can produce a great film and can act as well as there more experienced counterparts Joe Butler 10S Media Coursework Ms.Sale ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. Compare and contrast the two 'Romeo and Juliet' films,by Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann. ...

    As the name suggests, Benvolio, this character is one of the more virtuous of the two as 'bene' is the Latin for good. This is shown via his costume by the bright light colours, suggesting someone who is light hearted and open minded.

  2. Romeo and Juliet Luhrmann and Zeffirelli Film Comparison Essay.

    a scratch," and then starts to go mad and everyone knows he is being serious. Rather than have Italian actors, Lurrhman decided to use Hispanic ones, everything was a lot more Spanish in the film except the mafia ness of the families.

  1. Comparing two versions of Romeo & Juliet (Zefferelli and Baz Luhram).

    To start with, the general situation is rather like a family conflict. The feud between the Capulets and the Montagues had been passed down through the generations, until the youngest child had been planted with the seeds of hate. From the beginning of the play, it is learned that the

  2. How does Baz Luhrmann use film techniques to make Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" more ...

    At the point when Romeo and Juliet first meet either side of the fish tank acting as a barrier between them, a soft, meditational and soothing song is sung with the gentle lyrics, 'I'm, I'm kissing you, ohh, I'm missing you ohh,' this suggests they have only just met when

  1. Compare and contrast two films made by two different directors of, "Romeo and Juliet"

    They might seem old fashioned with their costumes but they make the costumes work for them, and they speak clearly, plus they have the accents with facial expressions and body language down pact. For example Tybalt, who is played by Micheal Yorke and is supposed to be a dark, evil

  2. Auteur research study. Auteur? - Baz Luhrmann

    I will now be able to express my own informed opinions surrounding the subject and sum up to what extent Baz Luhrmann can be considered an auteur. I have included a rating alongside each of the collected items which gives an indication of how useful each one were.

  1. How effectively do Baz Luhrmann and Franco Zeffirelli interpret Act I Scene VI when ...

    In the Franco Zeffirelli version Lord Capulet is more down to earth and less controlling. He jokes with the woman but doesn't seem to embarrass them, and is not over powering with them. He acts very graciously with the men, he acts as if he does not know them well

  2. Romeo and Juliet-Media Essay- A Comparison of the two film adpatations

    reads out the phrase two star cross'd lovers Franco Zeffirelli's play is set in 15th century Verona and Baz Luhrmans version is set in California 1996. This tells us that Franco Zeffirelli's version matches the original play more than Baz Luhrmans version because it is set in the actual city

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work