The Crucible - summary

Authors Avatar

The Crucible was written in 1952, and is considered to be Arthur Miller’s finest work not only because of the captivating story and impressive dramatic techniques but also because of the subtle parallels it draws with the events of the time. In the USA in the 1950s, the country was terrified of communism. This prompted the McCarthy era, in which anyone suspected of holding communist views or sympathies could suffer nasty consequences, including losing their job, or being excluded from certain places.

The play is set in 1692 in Salem, Massachusetts during the height of the mass hysteria surrounding witchcraft. At the start of act three, Martha Corey is accused of reading fortunes. In this scene, we get a good look at each of the court officials. Both Hathorne and Parris are desperate to be part of the proceedings. Hathorne repeatedly calls for witnesses to be questioned or held in contempt, only to be ignored by Danforth. This shows the audience that Hathorne’s opinions mean nothing, but it also shows us the power Danforth wields, not only over the population of Salem, but also over his own partners. There are many moments in the play when Hathorne and Parris get ignored or disrespected by Danforth, but early on in act three Hathorne asks Giles Corey ‘Are you gone daft, Corey?’ Corey replies ‘You’re not a Boston judge yet. You’ll not call me daft!’ This shows the difference in standing between the two men, as Danforth would never stand for being scolded in such a way.

Reverend Parris is shown similar disrespect by Danforth, as he is continually interrupted. This is also done by Giles Corey when he cuts Parris off mid-sentence and says ‘I am asked the question, and I am old enough to answer it.’ This is also the first time in the act we see Hale’s attitude begin to waver. When Danforth refuses to hear Corey’s evidence Hale pleads ‘Excellency, he claims to have hard evidence for his wife’s defence. I think that in all justice you must-’ He is then cut off by Danforth.

Danforth’s attitude of self-superiority is noticed here when he gets angry with Giles and asks ‘Do you take it upon yourself to determine what this court shall believe and what it shall set aside?’ This is ironic; Danforth is mocking Giles for thinking that one man can change what the court thinks. However, the reality is that Danforth’s opinion is the only one that matters. He also reminds Giles that ‘this is the highest court of the supreme government of this province’. This again shows Danforth’s superior attitude, but it also begins to show the audience his love of his position. This is backed up when he says to Francis Nurse ‘Do you know who I am, Mr. Nurse?’ Saying this implies that Danforth expects to be known, and also that he expects his reputation to guarantee he is not questioned. He also reminds Francis that he has imprisoned nearly 400 people and condemned 72 to death. It is frightening to the audience to hear that 72 people are dead over what are clearly absurd ‘crimes’. This is linked to the McCarthy period, where people were punished for their political views.

Join now!

The next major event is when John Proctor brings Marry Warren to court to confess her lies. Mary Warren is portrayed as weak and feeble, and Danforth plays to this. He asserts his power over her subtly. When she says ‘It were pretence, sir’ Danforth asks her to repeat herself, making her feel unsure of herself. When speaking to John Proctor, Danforth assumes a sterner tone. He questions Proctor on his Christianity, and when it is revealed that he only goes to church once a month and that he ploughed his fields on a Sunday, Hale begins to worry that ...

This is a preview of the whole essay