"The Principal Characters in the Merchant of Veniceare Motivated Mainly by Money" How far would you agree with this view of the play?

Authors Avatar

“The Principal Characters in the Merchant of Venice are Motivated Mainly by Money” How far would you agree with this view of the play?

On the whole I feel that this is a fairly accurate description of the play’s characters, with the mercantile Venice and Belmont (which trades in a different commodity but is trade none the less) mirroring their inhabitants. However to say that money was their only reason would be missing vital elements of the play.

The most obviously money orientated character is Shylock. His main priority seems to be his money over everything else including his only family: his daughter Jessica, which can be shown by his reported action on her elopement “My ducats and my daughter! A sealed bad, two sealed bags of ducats, of double ducats,”. In the speech references to money and wealth outweigh those of concern for his daughter.

Shylock’s desire for accumulated wealth and status works against him as he is ostracises from society as much for his practice of money lending as his Jewishness. However there is hypocrisy from Antonio who is against usury on principal as a Christian but he himself makes a living by buying goods on a large scale and then selling them on for a profit. Which begs the question of how much difference is there from profit from wheat and profiting from lending money? These prejudices against him from the community leaves Shylock full of anger and hate which leads to a deep seated desire for revenge – “You call me misbeliever, cut-throat dog, and spet upon my Jewish gabardine” and also further betrayal as Jessica ran off with a Christian “Oh my daughter! Fled with a Christian!” – Which leads him to cease the opportunity to reap his revenge on the Christians in the form of the “merry bond” upon Antonio and so then uses his money for power and justice(at least in his mind), “I’ll plague him, I’ll torture him – I am glad of it”.

Join now!

Shylock uses money for control and as a substitute for affection which was indicated by Shylock’s upset over the frivolous spending of a ring “It was my turquoise, I had it of Leah”. There is a possibility that the ring was a wedding or engagement ring as turquoise is a stone symbolising fidelity. As a significant other is not mentioned in the play and Jessica must have had a mother, and it may be assumed that she died or left him. This kind of loss may have lead Shylock to see his money as all he has left and so ...

This is a preview of the whole essay