• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Speckled Band and Lamb to the Slaughter comparison

Extracts from this document...


Wide reading assignment: Comparison between: "The Speckled Band" and "Lamb to the Slaughter" In this assignment, I am going to compare the two murder mystery stories: "Lamb to the Slaughter', written in 1954 by Roald Dahl, and 'The Speckled Band', written in 1892 by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Although both books are from the same genre, they have many differences. I will comment on these differences, and any similarities between the stories, and then come to conclusions based upon the comments I make. The main thing to remember when comparing the two books is the fact that they were written at different times. This means that the language used, and the way in which this language is used, will be different in each book. For example, we see that in 'The Speckled Band', that the sentences are generally much longer than the modern day sentences, used in 'Lamb to the Slaughter'. For example, we see that Dr. Watson says "It is perhaps as well that the facts should now come to light, for I have reasons to know there are widespread rumours to the death of Dr Grimesby Roylott which tend to make the matter even more terrible than the truth". This sentence is extremely long, which is made worse by the fact that there is only one comma in it, meaning that we can't pause for breath when we say it. ...read more.


This suggests that the rest of the book would be thrilling, and gripping, but the introduction was there, so that the events that would happen later could be outlined first. I can back this up, because Watson starts to tell us what happened in this case in the very next paragraph. In reflection, I will say that 'The Speckled Band' has the better introduction, simply because it seems as if it serves a purpose - with it leading up to later events. However, both introductions aren't gripping, which means that readers don't have an incentive to read on. Moving on from the introductions of the books, I will now look at the book endings. 'The Speckled Band' is lacklustre, quite frankly. The solution of the case is revealed in the ending, which means that we don't have any kind of ending that is enthralling, or that has a climax. I think that Conan Doyle should have attempted to try and tell us the answer, but with an enthralling ending. For example, he could have explained how he solved the mystery, and then have the scene with the snake slithering through the ventilator, trying to kill Helen Stoner. This would have made the ending more gripping. In 'Lamb to the slaughter', I think that the ending was much more nerve-wracking and mysterious than in 'The Speckled Band'. ...read more.


On the other hand, Dr. Grimesby Roylott is portrayed as being a much tougher person. When he spoke, Watson described his words as being "snarled," which suggests that he isn't a good person to talk to. He also: "stepped swiftly forwards, seized a poker, and bent it into a curve with his huge brown hands," in the course of the story, which says two things. Firstly, it describes the fact that he has the brute strength to bend a poker, which requires strength. But secondly, it describes him as having "huge brown hands," which suggests that he generally has a large body, capable of killing anyone. In contrast to Mary Maloney, Roylott seems much more capable of killing someone, as he is portrayed as being an evil character. Overall, I enjoyed reading how Holmes responded to events, and how quickly he deduced information from clues that he had, but I also liked the entertainment we get from 'Lamb to the Slaughter'. I enjoyed both books, but I think that 'Lamb to the Slaughter' has to be the more compelling, simply because we didn't know what to expect next when reading it, and it seemed a lot easier to be gripped by it, whereas in 'The Speckled Band' we could correctly assume what would happen next. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Conan Doyle section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Conan Doyle essays

  1. Lamb to the Slaughter

    Other points of tension were Helen Stoner talking to Holmes, "Frightened eyes like those of some hunted animal", the night of the murder, "A wild wind. The wind was howling outside..... Suddenly there burst forth the wild scream of a woman", and the sister's hot words, "She suddenly shrieked out

  2. Compare and contrast 'The Speckled Band' and Lamb to the Slaughter'

    (Sherlock Holmes) 'Holmes the Scotland Yard Jack-in-office.' Holmes chuckled heartily." Sherlock Holmes comes across as not at all being scared. You know this because he is not scared in more than one occasion. He was not scared when Dr Grimsby Roylott barges in and threatens him, he keeps very calm and another place where he keeps his

  1. Sherlock Holmes comparison

    in 'The Man with the Twisted Lip' it uses formal language like ""A very strong piece of evidence to corroborate your view." It also contained a lot of old language as it was considered normal at those times like "do you think that I will respond to such trifle."

  2. Speckled Band

    At all costs Roylott had to prevent them marrying, evidently even if it cost their lives. In "Silver Blaze" there was an aspect of money as a motive but it was not as direct as in "The Speckled Band". The fact that Roylott had two dangerous animals (excluding the swamp adder)

  1. Compare Lamb to the Slaughter,and The Speckled Band.

    Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's creation has had worldwide success and has also been made into a Television series. The stories prove so popular because of the way Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote the stories. He was very descriptive and gave the reader a real atmosphere of what it must be like to be in "Sherlock Holmes Land".

  2. Comparing and Constrasing the differences betweens 'Lamb to the Slaughter' and 'The Speckled Band'.

    Holmes and Watson were very professional, and took everything into consideration, and left no stone unturned in their quest to find the killer. The atmosphere in this story compared with that of 'Lamb to the Slaughter' is like chalk and cheese.

  1. To what extent do The Speckled Band and The Gatewood Caper fulfil my expectations ...

    If you can imagine walking through the wide and long corridors of such and old and lonely house at night time then you can imagine the sense of fear that would arise because of you being all alone. This is why a place like or similar to Stoke Moran from

  2. 'The Speckled Band' or 'Lamb to the Slaughter' - Which is the More Effective ...

    The mentioning of words such as 'tragic' and 'strange' gets us thinking that something 'tragic' or 'strange' is going to happen, so we read on. Conan Doyle hints to us what the story is going to be about by Watson saying, '...I have reasons to know there are widespread rumors

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work