• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The Woman at the Washington Zoo'

Extracts from this document...


'The Woman at the Washington Zoo' The poem 'The Woman at the Washington Zoo' is written by Randall Jarrell. Commentary written by Kristoffer Alsvik. It is not only physical jail cell bars that can keep a person in captivity, also the bars of one owns body and the limitations set by a way of living that could be the worst kind of prison. This poem brings up the topic of imprisonment, being trapped in ones own body, conscious of age and lack of importance. The poem suggests from the very start that this woman feels very alone. It doesn't seem like she relates to other people, only describing them as exotic or off this world clothing such as, saris (L 1) and "cloth from the moon" (L 2), and "cloth from another planet" (L 2). She instead of relating other people to herself, she instead relates them to the animals at the zoo where they are looking at the leopard "like the leopard" (L 3), saying that they are just like the leopard. ...read more.


all add to the feeling of her life being controlled by routine. So the argument of her prison is her life, and the routine controlling it. She makes the point of herself not being worthless, only in shadow of something else. The color of her clothing has stayed even though she has been "through so many cleanings" (L 8). She will not loose her color in "sunlight dyes" (L 12) stating that she is still going strong, and will not fade out. She also says her body lets "no hand suffuse" (L 12),saying she is not a ghost. Her "serviceable body" (L 11-12) receives "no complaints" (L 8-9), which means she does a good job, her body can do the work. However, "no complaints" (L 8-9) is followed by "no comment;" (L 9), which means that even though she does a good job where she gets no complaints she gets no comments either, like as if she is ignored and forgotten. ...read more.


The "meat the flies have clouded" is being teared at by all animals such as "buzzards" (L 23) and "vultures" (L 25), and even the sparrows and pigeons are taking a piece of the food. There may be a connection between her and the food, how these animals are all pecking and tearing her apart, tearing and destroying her pride. If this connection is made you may even think she wants to die, as she asks the vulture to "change me, change me!" (L 33), to take off his cloths "red helmet" (L 27) and "black wings" (L 27-28) and face her like an equal, "as man" (L 28), and give her the ultimate change, the change from living to dieing. This is a poem of how horrible living can be, how if you give it long enough time, it may drive you insane and even to suicide. The woman wanted a change, whether she wanted to leave life or only the zoo is hard to say, what is clear is that she didn't want to continue the way she did. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays


    Like his contemporaries, Balzac recognizes and reacts to dynamite, but that explosive lexicon informs the work of art and attains literariness only when integrated into the diegesis, when it becomes the engine that sets the narrative in motion.

  2. What were they like

    One of the differences is that 'What Were They Like' was about families working as a unit and helping each other out. This is one of the quotes I took to back my point "maybe fathers told their sons old tales".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work