What evidence is there in the first part of the play

Authors Avatar
What evidence is there in the first part of the play "Romeo and Juliet" that suggests it's going to end in disaster.

This essay will develop some important points, which may suggest why the play "Romeo and Juliet" is heading for disaster.

The play begins with a fight between a group of the "Capulets" and "Montagues". The two families have bitterly despised each other over generations and consequently they are constantly stirring up trouble. At last the Prince issues an ultimatum stating,

"If ever you disturb our streets again"

"Your lives will pay the forfeit of the peace". This means that if there were any more trouble someone would pay with his or her life. Therefore, the very first part of the play informs the reader that violence and hate are significant in the book.

Tybalt is a traditional "Capulet", he loves to pick a fight with his enemy, the Montagues, and he is not afraid to kill. He shows this when he says, "To strike Romeo dead I hold it not a sin". We can also see from Tybalts character that he enjoys fighting for he hates the word peace, as he "hates hell all Montagues and thee". Throughout the play we can find phrases pointing out Tybalt's hate for the Montagues. He mentions, "Romeo, the love I bear thee can afford",
Join now!


"No better term than this: thou art a villain", It could be that Tybalt here is trying to stir up trouble for another fight.

Friar Lawrence seems to be an educated man. He thinks situations through and always acts for the best. This is shown when he marries Romeo to Juliet even though he knows Romeo has just met her, he also knows how fast Romeo can change his opinion of girls for he had forgotten about his true love Rosaline as soon as he met Juliet. He says

"Is Rosaline that thou didst love so ...

This is a preview of the whole essay