• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which Version Of The Hamlet Ghost Scene (Act 1 Scene 5) Was The Most Effective And Why.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Which Version Of The Hamlet Ghost Scene (Act 1 Scene 5) Was The Most Effective And Why. In this essay I will compare three film versions of the ghost scene from Shakespeare's play, 'Hamlet'. They are; Mel Gibson version made in 1990, Kenneth Branagh's version produced in 1996 and Ethan Hawke's version from 2001. In my opinion the Mel Gibson version has the best interpretation of the ghost scene, because it is more original and believable than the same scene in the other two films. In this essay I will show why I prefer the Mel Gibson version, rather than the Ethan Hawke and Kenneth Branagh versions. The Mel Gibson film, the earliest of the three, from 1990, is filmed in the north of Denmark, which is where the play is actually set. It is in the medieval castle of Elsinore, which fits the period the play was originally set in. This is very effective as the castle buildings provide a dramatic setting and increases the tension of the film. The ghost scene is set in the castle battlements of Ellsinore and the dark night sky, along with the howling wind builds tension and suspense in the scene. In my opinion this is very effective because it's very traditional and fits in better with the way that Shakespeare had intended the scene to be perceived. ...read more.

Middle

The actor who plays the ghost uses facial expressions to add to the atmosphere. He appears with his eyes glazed over, and he looks white and pale, which is was very effective in making the ghost appear dead. The acting in the Ethan Hawke version of Hamlet is not as plausible as in the other two films. The actors appear wooden, and there is a lack of emotion in the way both Hamlet and the Ghost speak. Overall the scene is less effective; there is no real atmosphere created by the actors and it is very tame. The costumes in the Mel Gibson film were very traditional and old fashioned which fitted in with the setting and the period the film was first set in. they were very dark which added to the mood of the scene. As in all the films the costume doesn't really make the scene any more effective, they are just elements needed in the scene, which aren't crucially important. The make up of the ghost helps to make him look normal, not as a ghost or spirit, like in the other films. The costumes in the ghost scene of the Kenneth Branagh were also very traditional, much the same as the costumes in the Mel Gibson film, as they were both set in the same period. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the Kenneth Branagh film, tension is built up by making the ghost of Hamlet's father appear from the shaking ground, and there is a good use of special effects to build up the atmosphere, which makes the audience wonder what will happen next. Scenes in the orchard building after also help to build up the tension as Hamlet realises what's happened. In the Ethan Hawke film, the latest of the three, from 2001, atmosphere and tension isn't built up very well, if at all. The setting and characters vary so much from the original script that the scene isn't as good as the other two. The lack of emotion fails to create any real tension and atmosphere in my opinion. After evaluating the three films, I stuck by my decision that the Mel Gibson version, from 1990, was a better production of Shakespeare's Hamlet, than the versions with Kenneth Branagh in (1996) and Ethan Hawke (2001). I think this because it proved to be the more original film, and the other two films were weaker and not as good as the Mel Gibson version, when comparing different aspects of the films. The Mel Gibson film had a setting, which fitted in better with the one from the original play, the acting was more believable and the costumes and make up represented the characters emotions. The lighting wasn't as good as that of the Kenneth Branagh version, but overall I believe it was the better film at creating atmosphere and tension and therefore it was more effective. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Hamlet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Hamlet essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'The ghost is a useful dramatic device but for a modern audience its effect ...

    4 star(s)

    Following the initial appearance of the ghost, Shakespeare uses a rush of heavily charged words such as in Horatio's line 'And even the like precurse of fear'd events, as harbingers preceding still their fates'. The use of these words adds a dramatic intensity to the unfolding of this scene and enhances the ghost as a dramatic device.

  2. Ophelia Essay

    These two methods would create a totally different image of Ophelia. Act Three, scene One sees Claudius, Gertrude, Polonious and Ophelia discussing Hamlet's madness. Gertrude says to Ophelia that she wishes for both Hamlet's and Ophelia's sake that Hamlet may regain his sanity as soon as possible.

  1. Compare the opening sections of Kenneth Branagh's and Franco Zeffirelli's film versions of Hamlet.

    The guard looks very on edge and the audience gets the feeling from his stance and his facial expression the guard is waiting for something or someone. All we can hear at this point is the creatures of the night shrieking and the guard's own footsteps.

  2. Explore Shakespeare's presentation of Hamlet, his moods and motivations, through his soliloquies in Act ...

    Act II Scene 2 is also useful in other ways when looking at the portrayal of Hamlet (Shakespeare uses the scene to portray Hamlet in many different ways). We have seen that the soliloquy at the end of the scene portrays Hamlet as a complex thinker, but his thinking often leads to his delay in acting.

  1. Hamlet Act 3 scene 4

    Some of the words in this scene are quite difficult to interpret so I would have to make some sort of gesture in order to make it more obvious what the two actors mean. I think that obvious hand or body gestures would make it more obvious.

  2. Hamlet - In what way is Act 5 Scene 2 a fitting climax to ...

    Set it by a while". Hamlet carries the opening exchanges and the queen drinks to her health from the poisoned goblet. In the following chaos both duellists are wounded by the poisoned sword, the queen dies and Laertes reveals the plot concocted by himself and the king-"It is here, Hamlet.

  1. With close reference to language examine how fitting a close Act 5 scene ii ...

    "It is indifferent cold, my lord indeed." When Hamlet parodies Osric's style of speech he collapses and stands confused. Osric's language brings comic relief to the play and he allows Hamlet to be witty after Ophelia's death. He also reveals the theme of appearance and reality. He may or may not have realised that behind his comic character- he is deaths messenger.

  2. Compare and contrast the treatment of the play Hamlet by the directors Franco Zeffirelli ...

    come, it will be now; if it be not now, yet it will come - the readiness is all." Hamlet is now prepared to meet his fate if in fact death is his fate. This is the mindset he starts the fight in.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work