• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Write about the dramatic significance of Act One of the Crucible. How does Miller develop the scene structurally?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Write about the dramatic significance of Act One. How does Miller develop the scene structurally? The Crucible has a true historical background. It is set in 17th century Salem, Massachusetts. All the characters were real people who took part in real the witchcraft trials. Miller has created their personalities using his imagination as well as historical notes from the time. This makes the characters seem like real people with real lives. To allow the plot to go ahead, Abigail's age was changed from twelve to seventeen. The whole back story between John Proctor and Abigail would have to be omitted from the script if Abigail was to remain as twelve years old. The inclusion of the Abigail and John sub-plot story shows the audience that John regrets his mistakes and feels guilty about what he's done. It makes him seem more human and makes Abigail seem more manipulative and devious. The way John acts towards his wife, aware that she knows what's gone on, makes him seem like a more benevolent person. By including this story, Miller can control the audience's opinions of these characters. Sub-plots are just one of the ways Miller can make us see the characters from his point of view. ...read more.

Middle

He was able to show his views through literature. He is able to show that he didn't think that the people deserved to die. When Miller himself was summoned before the House Un-American Activities Committee, he felt himself being placed in the same situation as his character, John Proctor, when he was asked to name others who may be going against the law-as himself. He refused, just as John Proctor does, although he has later played down this similarity saying, "I was just trying to stay out of jail". So, on this count, there are links between the fictional world, the old theocratic world and the modern democratic one. The book was also seen as a political parable. Had Miller expressed his political views in a more direct fashion then the outcome of his appearance before the House Un-American Activities Committee might have been very different. Miller seems to structure the play into waves of hysteria and chaos, and calm and placid. Take, for instance, scene one. The action starts immediately. Betty is lying unconscious on the bed and within a few pages, the room is full of people and very soon, they are all arguing and shouting. Because there are so many people coming and going this creates a sense of confusion. ...read more.

Conclusion

The girls were obviously doing something which wasn't allowed otherwise they wouldn't act so anxiously around the subject. The film had an interesting take on the opening sequence. Whereas in the book, the girls were supposed to have been dancing in the forest to Tituba's songs, the film shows them performing proper black magic. They have a cauldron and are standing in a circle around it. One by one they drop a herb or some flowers into the mixture before, finally, Tituba kills a bird and puts that in as well. This was an interesting way to start the film as it makes it look as if the girls were actually dabbling in the occult. This is another example of how Miller uses confusion constructively as it makes you think about what's really happening. This play has roots on many different levels, not least in the domestic family life - Most referred to in Act One and Act Two. It is a kind of commentary on family life, neighbourly feuds and shrouded affairs gone public. Miller's play tells a story of guilt, regret, darkness, anger, vengeance, mass hysteria, hope, benevolence among the unscrupulous and heroism. In his lavish text Miller makes sure that there is always at least one emotion which you can relate to and that there is always a saving-grace for each character, something to make you sympathise with them-if only a little. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. "Examine the dramatic significance of this extract from The Crucible, showing its importance in ...

    These two techniques are emphasised throughout the play during Abigail's time in court and while talking to John Procter and the jury. Reverend Samuel Parris is depicted as weak, paranoid "Do you understand that I have my enemies?" and suspicious in the extract.

  2. "A View From The Bridge" is a play that deals with complex human relationships ...

    In the beginning of the play, Beatrice firmly stands up for Catherine and is behind her on almost everything, she disapproves of Eddie's actions and Catherine finds this rather unacceptable. This is very ironic seeing as how, towards the end of the play the roles are reversed and it becomes Beatrice on Eddie's side.

  1. By What means does Miller create a sense of Expectations within his audience in ...

    quicker get back a million dollars that was stole than a word that you gave away''. Eddie speaks this quote in Act I, while eating dinner with Beatrice and Catherine. This quote reveals the irony and madness of Eddie's character.

  2. How does Miller use the concept of witchcraft for dramatic effect and to expose ...

    (Her eyes fall on Mary Warren.)" Then its almost like it's an instant reaction for the girls to act on it and back her up: Mercy says, "(shivering) Your Honour, I freeze!" and then "(through chattering teeth) Mary, do you send this shadow on me?"

  1. How Does Miller use dramatic devices and effects in Act 3 of 'The Crucible' ...

    He was asked to name people who had attended a Committee meeting some ten years previously. He refused to do so and was fined for contempt of Congress. Although Miller himself has tended to play this down it was a courageous thing to do in those circumstances and he could have been sent to prison.

  2. Crucible Essay - What is the dramatic significance of Act 2 to the play ...

    Act two plays a vital role within 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller. As Act two begins we are introduced to the Proctors, as principal characters. John Proctor has appeared in the previous Act, but his wife Elizabeth, though previously described by Abigail, we have never met.

  1. The Crucible - analysing acts 3 and 4.

    Danforth is eager to have this paper, but does not to show it. He wants to tell everybody that Proctor has confessed, and is a good man, even though he is not. Miller choose this stage direction, [perplexed, but politely extending his hand], to make Danforth look less eager then

  2. In Act 3 of 'The Crucible' consider how Miller usesCharacter, language and dramatic devices ...

    Francis's approach to pleading for his wife is very different; he is calm and polite showing respect to the jury. Francis shocks Danforth as he speaks on his wife's behalf Rebecca Nurse accusing the girls' of "deceiving the court we have proof of it sir, they are all deceiving you".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work