Wuthering Heights - What does Emily Bronte convey about Heathcliff in each of the extracts?

Authors Avatar

Ashley Akerman,                             09/05/07                                        

English Coursework (Part One)-Comparison of 2 extracts from W.H

ENGLISH COURSEWORK (PART ONE) WUTHERING HEIGHTS

COMPARISON OF TWO EXTRACTS

What does Emily Bronte convey about Heathcliff in each?

I am going to compare two different extracts from the book Wuthering Heights written by Emily Bronte. I will compare the language and the structure of the different extracts.

 

Extract one is when Heathcliff has just been brought to the house. Mr Earnshaw has returned with Heathcliff after a trip to Liverpool. Extract 2 is the part of the book when Nelly’s been lured up to Wuthering heights by Heathcliff. This is also the part of the book when Heathcliff is exacting his revenge on people, then Nelly and Heathcliff begin to talk about his treatment of Hareton.

 

The way Emily Bronte conveys Heathcliff in the two extracts is   very different, in one extract Heathcliff is conveyed as an object whereas in the other extract he’s conveyed as a mean monster.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

In extract 1 Emily Bronte puts across that Heathcliff is picked on and doesn’t seem wanted by the family. The most frequent example of this is when Heathcliff is called ‘it’. This is sort of evocative language because ‘it’ triggers an emotional reaction towards Heathcliff, making us sympathise with him. Emily Bronte suggests that the family see Heathcliff as an object and not a person, or a boy. So you can see Heathcliff is being treated unfairly from the beginning. When the family refers to Heathcliff as “it” it shows that the family isn’t exactly a caring family, it also shows that the family members haven’t got caring personalities. This is except for Mr Earnshaw, even though he still calls Heathcliff “it”, he nevertheless seems to care more for Heathcliff than any other member of the family. The fact of him being called “it” is not so in the 2nd extract, instead Heathcliff is referred to as “him” and “he” like he is a person with a name and not a object, like in extract 1.

Join now!

 

In extract 1 Heathcliff is said to have come from the devil, as he is so dark. Again we sympathise with Heathcliff, and Heathcliff is described as dark so is portrayed as being dirty and unwashed. These facts of him being from the devil and being dirty are emphasised in the sentence: the word ‘devil’ is emphasised in the sentence because it is situated at the very end, also tension has been previously built up during the long sentence which helps to emphasise the impact of the word on the reader. This word is further highlighted by the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay