• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Mountain of achievement accompanied by a mountain of crimes" How far is this a fair assessment of Stalin policies?

Extracts from this document...


"A Mountain of achievement accompanied by a mountain of crimes" How far is this a fair assessment of Stalin policies? I think that this is quite a fair assessment of Stalin's policies because although he accumulated a load of crimes he achieved great success. So the quote, "A Mountain of achievement accompanied by a mountain of crimes" is and ideal to describe what Stalin did for the Soviet Union. One of the greatest successes that Stalin achieved was his five year plans for industrialisation. Stalin ended Lenin's New Economic Policy and set about modernisation thought a series of five-year plans. The idea of the five-year plans was to increase production for the vital heavy industries like coal, iron, oil and electricity. To begin with the first five-year plan was not a great success but it gave the USSR something to build upon for their second five-year plan. ...read more.


Those who owned their small private farms were known as the Kulaks, and many of them were simply not going to give up their land to the government and so they were sent to labour camps by the hundred. In the end Stalin ended up wiping out the Kulaks, this was a huge price to pay for trying to export food. Another one of Stalin's faults were his purges. Stalin simply got id of any opposition as soon they posed any sort of threat, he wiped them out rapidly leaving him with no enemies to try and over throw him. Furthermore he accused many of his opposition or those who doubted him with crimes they had not committed; this was known as show trails. ...read more.


Stalin's labour camps were certainly not popular at the time; many of the Kulaks who were opposed to collectivisation were sent to the camps and were imprisoned and murdered. They were arrested by the police of party officials before being sent away to the dreaded labour camps. Although many of the Soviets citizens were against the labour camps, they did the job they were supposed to do and collectivisation was finally achieved, also many of those who were sent tot the labour camps were made work very hard as well, so it was cheap labour. On the hole Stalin really did help the USSR advance forward to keep up with other powerful countries, and that's what Stalin wanted and he achieved it. However also he achieved great success this came at a price. That price was paid by the loss of many peoples lives. 1 Thomas Rutland History Essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin and the Five Year Plans

    Overall, I think that the five-year plans succeeded quite well on many fronts, but also failed on others. These plans did raise Russia's economy quite a lot, gave Russia a new place in the world and they did, in a way, show that communism worked.

  2. How successful were Stalins Economic Policies?

    But in the longer term, dekulakisation began to destroy the fabric of society, because it brutalised the people who were left.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    They were treated more like slaves than workers. Anything that went wrong was blamed on the workers. The Shakhty trial was an accusation of fifty-three workers who supposedly conspired to wreck the soviet coal-mining industry. In fact, the coal mines in the Donbass region had fallen behind target but the system could not be seen as a failure so workers were blamed.

  2. Evaluation on the Effect of Stalin's Economic and Social Policies

    Stalin's purpose in allowing women into the workforce was not to better women's rights at all, but to build a greater work force. There was such a high demand for a labor force in the 1930's, that women seemed like the next best option.

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    and so were unwilling to change circumstance. As these were Stalin's greatest impediment the communists encouraged the rest of the peasants to regard these 'kulaks' with jealousy and hatred, though without a huge amount of success. When Stalin decided to eliminate the problem of the 'kulaks' by force it served two purposes.

  2. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    In conclusion, I think that there is much reason to believe that Stalin carried out industrialisation to bring himself glory however we can also see that Stalin did this to make the USSR a much secure place as well as a dominant country.

  1. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Source E was written about Stalin by a writer who used it in a speech to the congress of Soviets in 1935. The speech was published in the official newspaper of the communist party, Pravda (which ironically translates as truth as it was censored by the 'socialist realism' policy).

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    It was this fact, and this alone, which enabled the Bolsheviks to come to power with the support of the decisive majority of society. Emerging from the ravages of the first world war, Tsarist Russia was a semi-colony particularly of France, Germany, and Britain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work