• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Mountain of achievement accompanied by a mountain of crimes" How far is this a fair assessment of Stalin policies?

Extracts from this document...


"A Mountain of achievement accompanied by a mountain of crimes" How far is this a fair assessment of Stalin policies? I think that this is quite a fair assessment of Stalin's policies because although he accumulated a load of crimes he achieved great success. So the quote, "A Mountain of achievement accompanied by a mountain of crimes" is and ideal to describe what Stalin did for the Soviet Union. One of the greatest successes that Stalin achieved was his five year plans for industrialisation. Stalin ended Lenin's New Economic Policy and set about modernisation thought a series of five-year plans. The idea of the five-year plans was to increase production for the vital heavy industries like coal, iron, oil and electricity. To begin with the first five-year plan was not a great success but it gave the USSR something to build upon for their second five-year plan. ...read more.


Those who owned their small private farms were known as the Kulaks, and many of them were simply not going to give up their land to the government and so they were sent to labour camps by the hundred. In the end Stalin ended up wiping out the Kulaks, this was a huge price to pay for trying to export food. Another one of Stalin's faults were his purges. Stalin simply got id of any opposition as soon they posed any sort of threat, he wiped them out rapidly leaving him with no enemies to try and over throw him. Furthermore he accused many of his opposition or those who doubted him with crimes they had not committed; this was known as show trails. ...read more.


Stalin's labour camps were certainly not popular at the time; many of the Kulaks who were opposed to collectivisation were sent to the camps and were imprisoned and murdered. They were arrested by the police of party officials before being sent away to the dreaded labour camps. Although many of the Soviets citizens were against the labour camps, they did the job they were supposed to do and collectivisation was finally achieved, also many of those who were sent tot the labour camps were made work very hard as well, so it was cheap labour. On the hole Stalin really did help the USSR advance forward to keep up with other powerful countries, and that's what Stalin wanted and he achieved it. However also he achieved great success this came at a price. That price was paid by the loss of many peoples lives. 1 Thomas Rutland History Essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin and the Five Year Plans

    They also showed that not all the leaders of Russia were complete idiots that did absolutely nothing for their country. The five-year plans showed that good leadership and powerful ideas were something that could come out of Russia and take the world by storm.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Stalin's use of terror played a major role to make sure workers did what was asked of them. Stalin created a new constitution for the USSR, which gave freedom of speech and free elections to the Russian people. However, only the Communist party candidates were allowed to stand in elections, and only approved newspapers and magazines could be published.

  1. How successful were Stalins Economic Policies?

    It also destroyed communist opposition - the only people who were against collectivisation were the people who stood to lose from it i.e. the richest. Dekulakisation meant that their possessions were forcibly seized, and they were shot or taken to labour camps.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    In addition, the conditions for workers on Stalin's major projects were appalling and incredibly dangerous which led to thousands of deaths and accidents. No wonder an estimation was made that the Belomor Canal had cost Stalin huge investments as well as nearly 100,000 lives.

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    and so were unwilling to change circumstance. As these were Stalin's greatest impediment the communists encouraged the rest of the peasants to regard these 'kulaks' with jealousy and hatred, though without a huge amount of success. When Stalin decided to eliminate the problem of the 'kulaks' by force it served two purposes.

  2. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    Nikolayev was led to believe that his life would be spared if he implicated the Zinovievites. He did so and confessed to Kirov's murder. The court presented no other evidence of a link between Nikolayev and the Zinovievites. The court pronounced the death penalty for all.

  1. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    In conclusion, I think that there is much reason to believe that Stalin carried out industrialisation to bring himself glory however we can also see that Stalin did this to make the USSR a much secure place as well as a dominant country.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Source L claims that Stalin was a 'gifted politician' and the author even goes so far as to say that Stalin was 'one of the greatest political figures of the twentieth century'. The author is obviously full of praise for Stalin's achievements.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work