• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assignment B: Stalin: Man or Monster

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin: Man or Monster? Study sources A, B, C. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answers with references to the sources. Source A shows an anti-humanitarian side of Stalin which shows the deaths of many Russians. Stalin seems to advertise them as a kind of tourist attraction. This was drawn by enemies of Stalin who were in exile in Paris. The skulls show the victims of the purges as it was drawn in the 1930's which were ordered by Stalin because of his paranoia. Source B is propaganda portraying Stalin in a positive way, as the man who whilst being friendly with the workers whilst also being an efficient leader by building a dam (the Dnieprostroi dam) which is made to look very modern. The fact that Stalin is smoking shows that while he has built a huge dam he also has the time to relax and be communist, talking with his workers and be an equal. However, he is dressed in white which indicates that he his angelic and not equal to the workers around him. It also shows Stalin in the middle focusing attention on him, not as an equal to his workers. Source C shows Stalin as a large figure perhaps more than a man. ...read more.

Middle

However, source F shares a view that is very much against Stalin. It was written in 1936 by Bukharin, at that time an enemy of Stalin after the losses of key Bolsheviks who were killed in the 'Purges'. Bukharin himself was a victim and was tried and executed in 1938. The author of source E is unknown but seeing how extreme it is, ' the first word it shall utter will be: Stalin' and how we now know of the terrible murders of the 1930's this is quite unbelievable and may have been written by the Bolsheviks as propaganda since it appeared in the party newspaper, Pravda. Bukharin had been betrayed by Stalin after he helped Stalin to become the leader over Trotsky. Not only Bukharin but Zinoviev and Kamanev, former allies of Stalin were said to be traitors to communism during the Purges and were executed. Source F can therefore be seen as reliable with Bukharin stating that Stalin was 'not a man, but a devil'. Stalin was regarded as a very suspicious man which is also stated in source F. Even though we now see that Stalin was a tyrant, people in Russia may still have seen him as a very successful and powerful man. We can see this from his propaganda. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin did erase all the Kulaks by 1934. Collectivisation did not achieve a lot only human lives. Stalin did not seem to care However, on the other hand Stalin did successfully make Russia a leading industrial power. His five year plans could be argued to have saved the Soviet Union from the Nazis. Stalin successfully used Russia's rich raw materials to his advantage. Unemployment was almost non-existent. Women were allowed to work (40% of workers) and bonuses were given for overachieving. Even with his great successes, the human cost was huge. Discipline in factories was harsh with punishments including death. Workers were not allowed to travel between cities and there were many deaths. 100000 people died in the Belamor canal, the same may have died during the making of the dam in source B. You can see from source C the might of Stalin's industrial Russia but you don't see the human cost that was made to make it. Stalin in his time was seen by many as a good leader this may have been upheld by fear of his labour camps and his secret police; he did get the job done. He is however, without doubt, a tyrant who killed many men to achieve his goals and stay in power. Source I shares my view that even if he was a successful leader, he did have 'a dark and evil side to his nature'. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ben Clarke ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    In conclusion, although the five-year plans did bring glory to Stalin, the fact that it inspired the Russian public to work harder than ever and the fact that the whole Russian economy was raised by quite a great deal proves that glory was not the only way in which it was seen.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    could be bought by the government to feed the increasing number of industrial workers in the cities. Besides, the government needed money to finance new industries, the transport system - railways, power stations and mines. Peasants were the best targets to pay for the development areas as there were the majority of the population.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    All three sources are similar in a way that all of them involve Stalin in some way associated with the Russian people. Also, all of them have some truth in them. They are all very different as each one shows a different aspect of Stalin and how he dealt with Russian people while he was in power.

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    Therefore this source cannot be used to prove source F is correct. Neither of the sources is reliable, because they are official documents released when Stalin was in control. Source G does not prove source F is true because it is likely to be a "set up".

  1. Stalin man or monster

    him from the image of aggression and killing normally associated with an army uniform, Setting is very calm sea trees sunny dies gives the impression of a peace loving and gentle man. This contradicts source A, which portrays Stalin as a cruel dictator.

  2. Russia - Stalin

    purges and show trials * The secret police * Propaganda and the cult of personality * Stalin's economic policies Explain how far you agree with this statement All of these reasons in some way were linked with each other or had some sort of effect on one and other.

  1. Stalin : Man or monster

    However this source also gives useful evidence about Stalin as it shows that he had enough power to indoctrinate people into believing his stories about his past. 3.Which of these two sources is more reliable? Throughout the whole of source E, everything that is said is positive about Stalin.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    For example, "When the woman I love presents me with a child, the first word it shall utter will be Stalin" and "The men of all ages will call thy name, which is strong, beautiful, wise and marvellous"- completely over exaggerated.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work