• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assignment B: Stalin: Man or Monster

Extracts from this document...


Stalin: Man or Monster? Study sources A, B, C. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answers with references to the sources. Source A shows an anti-humanitarian side of Stalin which shows the deaths of many Russians. Stalin seems to advertise them as a kind of tourist attraction. This was drawn by enemies of Stalin who were in exile in Paris. The skulls show the victims of the purges as it was drawn in the 1930's which were ordered by Stalin because of his paranoia. Source B is propaganda portraying Stalin in a positive way, as the man who whilst being friendly with the workers whilst also being an efficient leader by building a dam (the Dnieprostroi dam) which is made to look very modern. The fact that Stalin is smoking shows that while he has built a huge dam he also has the time to relax and be communist, talking with his workers and be an equal. However, he is dressed in white which indicates that he his angelic and not equal to the workers around him. It also shows Stalin in the middle focusing attention on him, not as an equal to his workers. Source C shows Stalin as a large figure perhaps more than a man. ...read more.


However, source F shares a view that is very much against Stalin. It was written in 1936 by Bukharin, at that time an enemy of Stalin after the losses of key Bolsheviks who were killed in the 'Purges'. Bukharin himself was a victim and was tried and executed in 1938. The author of source E is unknown but seeing how extreme it is, ' the first word it shall utter will be: Stalin' and how we now know of the terrible murders of the 1930's this is quite unbelievable and may have been written by the Bolsheviks as propaganda since it appeared in the party newspaper, Pravda. Bukharin had been betrayed by Stalin after he helped Stalin to become the leader over Trotsky. Not only Bukharin but Zinoviev and Kamanev, former allies of Stalin were said to be traitors to communism during the Purges and were executed. Source F can therefore be seen as reliable with Bukharin stating that Stalin was 'not a man, but a devil'. Stalin was regarded as a very suspicious man which is also stated in source F. Even though we now see that Stalin was a tyrant, people in Russia may still have seen him as a very successful and powerful man. We can see this from his propaganda. ...read more.


Stalin did erase all the Kulaks by 1934. Collectivisation did not achieve a lot only human lives. Stalin did not seem to care However, on the other hand Stalin did successfully make Russia a leading industrial power. His five year plans could be argued to have saved the Soviet Union from the Nazis. Stalin successfully used Russia's rich raw materials to his advantage. Unemployment was almost non-existent. Women were allowed to work (40% of workers) and bonuses were given for overachieving. Even with his great successes, the human cost was huge. Discipline in factories was harsh with punishments including death. Workers were not allowed to travel between cities and there were many deaths. 100000 people died in the Belamor canal, the same may have died during the making of the dam in source B. You can see from source C the might of Stalin's industrial Russia but you don't see the human cost that was made to make it. Stalin in his time was seen by many as a good leader this may have been upheld by fear of his labour camps and his secret police; he did get the job done. He is however, without doubt, a tyrant who killed many men to achieve his goals and stay in power. Source I shares my view that even if he was a successful leader, he did have 'a dark and evil side to his nature'. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ben Clarke ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Deng promised that everyone should have at least a primary school education; he recognised that there were too many illiterate people. Socially, Deng wanted China to remain communist, but he also wanted China to change its view of other countries and how they saw China.

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    It was published in 1974 when communism was still around but was about to fall. It reads: "The terror was necessary, not only to keep me obedient" this shows that Stalin's actions in the USSR during his reign he manipulated fear to maintain his position.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    In addition, the conditions for workers on Stalin's major projects were appalling and incredibly dangerous which led to thousands of deaths and accidents. No wonder an estimation was made that the Belomor Canal had cost Stalin huge investments as well as nearly 100,000 lives.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    These people were put on trial as they thought they had a plan against the Communist regime. The Five-Year Plans really did make Russia a much stronger country. Not only did the Five-Year Pans allow its economy to raise and allow the people of Russia to have their own money,

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    The other interpretation is that he is only writing it because he has to. If anyone wrote something criticising Stalin at the time he would probably have been executed. The writer may have been living in fear of his life and of those close to him and written something praising Stalin to keep them safe.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    This could be why Bukharin hated him Stalin so. Bukharin man returned to Russia to stand up for himself, but unfortunately was a victim of Stalin's purges. This proves that Stalin must have seen him as a threat and proves that Stalin was paranoid. From studying both these sources, I think that source F is more reliable than source E because source F makes sense.

  1. Source A comes from a cartoon published in Paris in the 1930s. It shows ...

    Source G is a speech made by Khruschev in 1956 to the soviet communist party. The speech was in secret because he wanted to avoid weakening the leadership status of the communist party. He blames Stalin for most things that happened in the 1930s, criticising the murders of loyal communists.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Source A on the other hand is a caricature, Stalin didn't actually stand in front of a pyramid and point at million of dead Russian's skulls. This can imply that source B is much more reliable then source A as only the concept of source A really happened, but not that actual picture.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work