• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assignment B: Stalin: Man or Monster

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin: Man or Monster? Study sources A, B, C. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answers with references to the sources. Source A shows an anti-humanitarian side of Stalin which shows the deaths of many Russians. Stalin seems to advertise them as a kind of tourist attraction. This was drawn by enemies of Stalin who were in exile in Paris. The skulls show the victims of the purges as it was drawn in the 1930's which were ordered by Stalin because of his paranoia. Source B is propaganda portraying Stalin in a positive way, as the man who whilst being friendly with the workers whilst also being an efficient leader by building a dam (the Dnieprostroi dam) which is made to look very modern. The fact that Stalin is smoking shows that while he has built a huge dam he also has the time to relax and be communist, talking with his workers and be an equal. However, he is dressed in white which indicates that he his angelic and not equal to the workers around him. It also shows Stalin in the middle focusing attention on him, not as an equal to his workers. Source C shows Stalin as a large figure perhaps more than a man. ...read more.

Middle

However, source F shares a view that is very much against Stalin. It was written in 1936 by Bukharin, at that time an enemy of Stalin after the losses of key Bolsheviks who were killed in the 'Purges'. Bukharin himself was a victim and was tried and executed in 1938. The author of source E is unknown but seeing how extreme it is, ' the first word it shall utter will be: Stalin' and how we now know of the terrible murders of the 1930's this is quite unbelievable and may have been written by the Bolsheviks as propaganda since it appeared in the party newspaper, Pravda. Bukharin had been betrayed by Stalin after he helped Stalin to become the leader over Trotsky. Not only Bukharin but Zinoviev and Kamanev, former allies of Stalin were said to be traitors to communism during the Purges and were executed. Source F can therefore be seen as reliable with Bukharin stating that Stalin was 'not a man, but a devil'. Stalin was regarded as a very suspicious man which is also stated in source F. Even though we now see that Stalin was a tyrant, people in Russia may still have seen him as a very successful and powerful man. We can see this from his propaganda. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin did erase all the Kulaks by 1934. Collectivisation did not achieve a lot only human lives. Stalin did not seem to care However, on the other hand Stalin did successfully make Russia a leading industrial power. His five year plans could be argued to have saved the Soviet Union from the Nazis. Stalin successfully used Russia's rich raw materials to his advantage. Unemployment was almost non-existent. Women were allowed to work (40% of workers) and bonuses were given for overachieving. Even with his great successes, the human cost was huge. Discipline in factories was harsh with punishments including death. Workers were not allowed to travel between cities and there were many deaths. 100000 people died in the Belamor canal, the same may have died during the making of the dam in source B. You can see from source C the might of Stalin's industrial Russia but you don't see the human cost that was made to make it. Stalin in his time was seen by many as a good leader this may have been upheld by fear of his labour camps and his secret police; he did get the job done. He is however, without doubt, a tyrant who killed many men to achieve his goals and stay in power. Source I shares my view that even if he was a successful leader, he did have 'a dark and evil side to his nature'. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ben Clarke ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    During the second plan there were great increases in the electricity production, fertiliser production, for the first time, mining for copper, zinc and tin were undergone. Russia by 1937 was a developed country and was self-sufficient in metalworking, machine making country, there were substantial progress made in the production of energy, iron ore and metal industries.

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    It depicts Stalin as a mass murder showing death was the ultimate result of his policies. There is some truth in this, although the cartoon is anti-Stalin and anti-communism, many of Stalin's policies lead to death. Collectivisation was unpopular with the peasants and led to the Famine in 1921.

  1. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Khrushchev does not say in this source anything of his own opinions of Stalin, excluding 'we cannot say that these were the deeds of a mad despot'. Khrushchev simply states Stalin's justifications of the results of Stalin's reign of power.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    Source C portrays amongst a crowd the wives of army officer cheering and commending Stalin. This could be because of Propaganda in order to encourage more women to work as there was a shortage of workers. Thus the government concentrated on drafting more women into industry.

  1. Russia - Stalin

    Though Trotsky was Lenin's favourite and was a very intelligent, forceful, well organized leader he was outnumbered and just became a pawn to Stalin's very cleverly played game. c) The following were equally important reasons why Stalin was able to hold on to power in the Soviet Union: * The

  2. Stalin : Man or monster

    It is thanking Stalin for everything, claiming that he is great and how they are privileged to see Stalin. It is repetitive and contains many praising words and statements which is an exaggerated way to describe a person. This is from a speech of a writer of the congress of

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    This speech could've been said with the intentions of keeping on good terms with Stalin because we know that Stalin was a very paranoid person and thought that nearly everyone was against him, so this could've been made with the intentions of staying alive.

  2. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    Stalin writes "it seems to me that the lack of concern our leaders show towards their people is the same as the attitudes I met in far-off Siberia" this was at a time when he was already leader but he needed the people to trust him, to support him so

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work