• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bloody Sunday - Why interpretations differ.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Richard Wiseman 11GH Bloody Sunday Why interpretations differ. January 30th 1972 was a dark day for Northern Ireland. During a civil rights march in the Bogside the British army opened fire on marchers. The result was fourteen dead Catholics. The exact facts about the event still remain controversial. I will attempt to look into why interpretations of Bloody Sunday differ, using the sources provided and my own studies. In source A when confronted with evidence that points towards blaming the paratroopers for the deaths a soldiers denounces it as "rubbish". He then goes on to say, "For years people have accused us of firing indiscriminately. We weren't." The paratroopers were against another enquiry into Bloody Sunday as they saw that justice had had its way in the first inquiry, they saw another inquiry as just to appease the Catholics. Another reason was that the paras were afraid that the new enquiry would uncover some things that they would rather was kept secret, did the paras have something to hide? ...read more.

Middle

This is shown in source B. A forensic report shows that one of the victims was shot in the back of the head with a type of bullet made illegal by the Geneva Convention. It seems difficult to believe the Army in light of this evidence. The other side involved in this incident were the protesters. They claim the as the Paratroop Regiment moved to make their arrests they simply open fire on the crowd. They claim that from the protesters there was no fire what so ever. In source B its tells how forensic suggest that one marcher was shot through the back of the head, not exactly an offensive stance. Other eyewitnesses of the shootings give their stories. Alana Burke says how she saw "old men battered to the ground." Alex Nash says "they were there, the three bodies, innocent boys." These were found on the BBC website. These accounts were given to the BBC reporters from the hospitals where the victims were being treated. ...read more.

Conclusion

He said that he personally saw no shooters in the marchers. As a journalist he is expected to be independent. Although he could have been looking for a good story and perverting the truth somewhat to get a good "scoop." But besides that I see him as the most reliable witness. There are many conflicting views to what happened on Bloody Sunday and it is hard to come to any conclusion about the real events. Although it is easy to see where each view comes from. With such heated conflict between the Nationalists and Unionists it seemed inevitable that something like this would happen. In some ways you can see why the Army might lose their cool with the marchers. When they were on operations in Ireland they were constantly being attacked with stones and nail bombs etc. The soldiers must have been itching to get their own back. Also you can see why the marchers, if they did, would fire on the Army. They saw the Army as a force of oppression and wanted to break free. With such heated rivalry and conflicting views it is difficult to make any judgement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Bloody Sunday and the Conflict in Ireland

    This really is one of the reasons people have become Republican when they were originally Nationalist. So many Catholics have been put through this situation, and they do not want anyone else to have to see it, especially not their children.

  2. Northern Ireland - Bloody Sunday.

    Unionists have also started to give up on this agreement. The Saville Inquiry: After a campaign by families of those killed and injured, the Prime Minister, Tony Blair, announced a fresh inquiry into Bloody Sunday in January 1998, supervised by Lord Saville.

  1. Ireland coursework-Part AIreland has had a lot of trouble over the years for many ...

    Also the bombing in Omagh showed that the IRA hadn't kept their ceasefire. Sinn Fein were annoyed with the Unionists because of violent clashes at Dumcree when the Orange marches insisted on marching down a mainly Catholic street in July 1998.

  2. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    Primarily, this would give credibility to the Republican struggle, as it would reiterate everything that Republicans and Nationalists had protested against i.e. that the British Forces murdered 14 innocent civilians. Conceding to this atrocity would in fact enforce what nationalists have stated since that day, that the British government helped

  1. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    However, the source has some transparencies, which do not appear in any of the other sources. The use of Army armoured cars appears not to be mentioned in hardly any of the other sources, and this evidence occurred about six months after the incident.

  2. bloody sunday assignment 2

    The Conservative government wanted to show that politicians from Ulster and Eire could work together for peace. The Northern Ireland Act was passed in July 1973, it had the support of the Dublin government and stated: º Power-sharing would occur, this was giving a voice to the Catholic minority in

  1. The events that occurred in Derry on the 30th January 1972 became known as ...

    In the article Tony Blair is accused of setting up the inquiry to appease Sinn Fein during talks on the Northern Ireland Peace process. I think this source is definitely interpreted as in favour of the army and that the Saville Report is a fix which is being used by Tony Blair to get peace in Ulster.

  2. Report: Events of Bloody Sunday

    2)"The decision to contain the march within the Bogside and Creggan had been opposed by the Chief Superintendent of Police in Londonderry but was fully justified by events and was successfully carried out" Here the decision taken by the Chief Superintendent is not fully justified because of the eventual outcome after the marches had taken place.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work