• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bloody Sunday - Why interpretations differ.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Richard Wiseman 11GH Bloody Sunday Why interpretations differ. January 30th 1972 was a dark day for Northern Ireland. During a civil rights march in the Bogside the British army opened fire on marchers. The result was fourteen dead Catholics. The exact facts about the event still remain controversial. I will attempt to look into why interpretations of Bloody Sunday differ, using the sources provided and my own studies. In source A when confronted with evidence that points towards blaming the paratroopers for the deaths a soldiers denounces it as "rubbish". He then goes on to say, "For years people have accused us of firing indiscriminately. We weren't." The paratroopers were against another enquiry into Bloody Sunday as they saw that justice had had its way in the first inquiry, they saw another inquiry as just to appease the Catholics. Another reason was that the paras were afraid that the new enquiry would uncover some things that they would rather was kept secret, did the paras have something to hide? ...read more.

Middle

This is shown in source B. A forensic report shows that one of the victims was shot in the back of the head with a type of bullet made illegal by the Geneva Convention. It seems difficult to believe the Army in light of this evidence. The other side involved in this incident were the protesters. They claim the as the Paratroop Regiment moved to make their arrests they simply open fire on the crowd. They claim that from the protesters there was no fire what so ever. In source B its tells how forensic suggest that one marcher was shot through the back of the head, not exactly an offensive stance. Other eyewitnesses of the shootings give their stories. Alana Burke says how she saw "old men battered to the ground." Alex Nash says "they were there, the three bodies, innocent boys." These were found on the BBC website. These accounts were given to the BBC reporters from the hospitals where the victims were being treated. ...read more.

Conclusion

He said that he personally saw no shooters in the marchers. As a journalist he is expected to be independent. Although he could have been looking for a good story and perverting the truth somewhat to get a good "scoop." But besides that I see him as the most reliable witness. There are many conflicting views to what happened on Bloody Sunday and it is hard to come to any conclusion about the real events. Although it is easy to see where each view comes from. With such heated conflict between the Nationalists and Unionists it seemed inevitable that something like this would happen. In some ways you can see why the Army might lose their cool with the marchers. When they were on operations in Ireland they were constantly being attacked with stones and nail bombs etc. The soldiers must have been itching to get their own back. Also you can see why the marchers, if they did, would fire on the Army. They saw the Army as a force of oppression and wanted to break free. With such heated rivalry and conflicting views it is difficult to make any judgement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Northern Ireland - Bloody Sunday.

    Unionists have also started to give up on this agreement. The Saville Inquiry: After a campaign by families of those killed and injured, the Prime Minister, Tony Blair, announced a fresh inquiry into Bloody Sunday in January 1998, supervised by Lord Saville.

  2. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    This would mean many more industrial and factory workers. It was these workers that became discontented and marched on 'Bloody Sunday' and so, without the rapid growth in industrial production, the march may not have occurred when it did. Also, the fact that there was a large increase in railways

  1. Ireland coursework-Part AIreland has had a lot of trouble over the years for many ...

    Up to this day Catholics are still angry at the British for this incident, they will never forget what happened. They still have this anger at the back of their minds when disagreements between Protestants and Catholics occur today. This incident has led to Ireland being close to America, because

  2. The build up to Bloody Sunday, and why it happened.

    When they arrived in Northern Ireland, the British Army was welcomed by Nationalists and Catholics as their protectors, there to protect them from the B-Specials, a paramilitary unit associated with the RUC. After 'Bloody Sunday', many Nationalists and Catholics distrusted the army, seeing it no longer as their protectors but as their enemies.

  1. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    Many people called for a United Nations role. Nationalists became even more suspicious of the British government's role in Ireland. One of the most significant consequences is that many young Catholics swelled the ranks of the IRA. In the 3 years prior to Bloody Sunday 210 were killed in troubles.

  2. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    Source B is taken from Simon Winchester's report for the Guardian. This can seem rather transparent in places, but it has to be realised that this is a respectable newspaper and would want to retain credibility by appearing to be fair in its evidence.

  1. bloody sunday assignment 1

    Gradually people in Ireland began to turn their support from Home Rule to the idea of complete independence. This was due to the English shooting 3 major rebel leaders: Patrick Pearse; Sean McDonnel and James Connoly. The support for Sinn Fein grew, and the IRA was formed.

  2. bloody sunday assignment 2

    The descriptions of how people were shot by the British Army are horrific and intensely inhumane. Again we see the British Army in a bad light, and wonder ourselves if they really were there to protect or if this was just a game to them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work