• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bloody Sunday - Why interpretations differ.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Richard Wiseman 11GH Bloody Sunday Why interpretations differ. January 30th 1972 was a dark day for Northern Ireland. During a civil rights march in the Bogside the British army opened fire on marchers. The result was fourteen dead Catholics. The exact facts about the event still remain controversial. I will attempt to look into why interpretations of Bloody Sunday differ, using the sources provided and my own studies. In source A when confronted with evidence that points towards blaming the paratroopers for the deaths a soldiers denounces it as "rubbish". He then goes on to say, "For years people have accused us of firing indiscriminately. We weren't." The paratroopers were against another enquiry into Bloody Sunday as they saw that justice had had its way in the first inquiry, they saw another inquiry as just to appease the Catholics. Another reason was that the paras were afraid that the new enquiry would uncover some things that they would rather was kept secret, did the paras have something to hide? ...read more.

Middle

This is shown in source B. A forensic report shows that one of the victims was shot in the back of the head with a type of bullet made illegal by the Geneva Convention. It seems difficult to believe the Army in light of this evidence. The other side involved in this incident were the protesters. They claim the as the Paratroop Regiment moved to make their arrests they simply open fire on the crowd. They claim that from the protesters there was no fire what so ever. In source B its tells how forensic suggest that one marcher was shot through the back of the head, not exactly an offensive stance. Other eyewitnesses of the shootings give their stories. Alana Burke says how she saw "old men battered to the ground." Alex Nash says "they were there, the three bodies, innocent boys." These were found on the BBC website. These accounts were given to the BBC reporters from the hospitals where the victims were being treated. ...read more.

Conclusion

He said that he personally saw no shooters in the marchers. As a journalist he is expected to be independent. Although he could have been looking for a good story and perverting the truth somewhat to get a good "scoop." But besides that I see him as the most reliable witness. There are many conflicting views to what happened on Bloody Sunday and it is hard to come to any conclusion about the real events. Although it is easy to see where each view comes from. With such heated conflict between the Nationalists and Unionists it seemed inevitable that something like this would happen. In some ways you can see why the Army might lose their cool with the marchers. When they were on operations in Ireland they were constantly being attacked with stones and nail bombs etc. The soldiers must have been itching to get their own back. Also you can see why the marchers, if they did, would fire on the Army. They saw the Army as a force of oppression and wanted to break free. With such heated rivalry and conflicting views it is difficult to make any judgement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    of the nationalist community, not just because of the murders on that day, but because of the many years of cover-up and untrue allegations and slurs against these innocent men and boys. The British propaganda machine when set in motion could not be reversed.

  2. The build up to Bloody Sunday, and why it happened.

    Enniskillen and the blowing up of a young child at Warrington in Britain. With the official cessation of violence by some of the major terrorist organisations, and the creation of the power-sharing executive at Stormont Parliament Buildings in Belfast under the Good Friday Agreement, the Saville Tribunal's re-examination of what

  1. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    The symbolism, the propaganda value of all of this is huge. The self esteem which their community has got is huge. The fact that these are the two people who are leading the peace faction, have been elected, cannot be underestimated.

  2. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    This makes it a reliable, useful source in showing the rapid growth of industrial production in the time leading up to 'Bloody Sunday'. So, although none of the sources refer directly to the massacre, all are important in showing the background information needed to understand why it occurred and so they are useful to the historian studying 'Bloody Sunday'.

  1. How useful are sources A, B, C and D to someone trying to find ...

    to lose and will do whatever they can to prove they are right. To arrive at as balanced an interpretation of the events of Bloody Sunday as possible and to try to reconcile the opposing viewpoints of sources F and G it is necessary to consult a wide range of sources.

  2. Northern Ireland - Bloody Sunday.

    They also disliked the fact that the army put up with the stone throwing and abuse. As their commanding officer, Lt Col Derek Wilford said, "we thought it was a peculiar way for the soldiers to behave...My soldiers were never going to act like Aunt Sallies." The soldiers were anxious.

  1. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    Source A, the official army statement approved by Sir Harry Tuzo, appears to be primarily about protecting the reputation of the British Army. It seems to be taking an unlikely line, seeing what the army would want to see the massacre to be rather than the truth.

  2. bloody sunday assignment 1

    Units were formed from the Ulster Volunteer Force to fight in Europe, and before the end of 1915 there were 29000 volunteers. But it was not only the Protestants that were willing to join Britain, 80000 Irish Volunteers also served with the British arm, they were drawn in to fight in the cause of a Catholic country- Belgium.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work