• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bloody Sunday - Why interpretations differ.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Richard Wiseman 11GH Bloody Sunday Why interpretations differ. January 30th 1972 was a dark day for Northern Ireland. During a civil rights march in the Bogside the British army opened fire on marchers. The result was fourteen dead Catholics. The exact facts about the event still remain controversial. I will attempt to look into why interpretations of Bloody Sunday differ, using the sources provided and my own studies. In source A when confronted with evidence that points towards blaming the paratroopers for the deaths a soldiers denounces it as "rubbish". He then goes on to say, "For years people have accused us of firing indiscriminately. We weren't." The paratroopers were against another enquiry into Bloody Sunday as they saw that justice had had its way in the first inquiry, they saw another inquiry as just to appease the Catholics. Another reason was that the paras were afraid that the new enquiry would uncover some things that they would rather was kept secret, did the paras have something to hide? ...read more.

Middle

This is shown in source B. A forensic report shows that one of the victims was shot in the back of the head with a type of bullet made illegal by the Geneva Convention. It seems difficult to believe the Army in light of this evidence. The other side involved in this incident were the protesters. They claim the as the Paratroop Regiment moved to make their arrests they simply open fire on the crowd. They claim that from the protesters there was no fire what so ever. In source B its tells how forensic suggest that one marcher was shot through the back of the head, not exactly an offensive stance. Other eyewitnesses of the shootings give their stories. Alana Burke says how she saw "old men battered to the ground." Alex Nash says "they were there, the three bodies, innocent boys." These were found on the BBC website. These accounts were given to the BBC reporters from the hospitals where the victims were being treated. ...read more.

Conclusion

He said that he personally saw no shooters in the marchers. As a journalist he is expected to be independent. Although he could have been looking for a good story and perverting the truth somewhat to get a good "scoop." But besides that I see him as the most reliable witness. There are many conflicting views to what happened on Bloody Sunday and it is hard to come to any conclusion about the real events. Although it is easy to see where each view comes from. With such heated conflict between the Nationalists and Unionists it seemed inevitable that something like this would happen. In some ways you can see why the Army might lose their cool with the marchers. When they were on operations in Ireland they were constantly being attacked with stones and nail bombs etc. The soldiers must have been itching to get their own back. Also you can see why the marchers, if they did, would fire on the Army. They saw the Army as a force of oppression and wanted to break free. With such heated rivalry and conflicting views it is difficult to make any judgement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    Once they invented these allegations it would be hard to admit to the truth as they knew nationalists and the Irish Government could use this as a political stick to beat them with. Also the British consider their judicial system to be unquestionable, and admitting to such an allegation would make a mockery of this very system of British justice.

  2. Northern Ireland - Bloody Sunday.

    They will also have to set up a council of ministers from North and South and attempt to co-operate to resolve the problems. The real IRA does not accept this agreement. In August 1998, they planted a car-bomb in Omagh and twenty-nine people were killed.

  1. The build up to Bloody Sunday, and why it happened.

    Enniskillen and the blowing up of a young child at Warrington in Britain. With the official cessation of violence by some of the major terrorist organisations, and the creation of the power-sharing executive at Stormont Parliament Buildings in Belfast under the Good Friday Agreement, the Saville Tribunal's re-examination of what

  2. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    In the cartoon, the workers have the largest numbers but they are still mistreated. They are working hard but don't seem to be getting any reward and there are people dying because they have to 'hold up' the rest of society.

  1. Ireland coursework-Part AIreland has had a lot of trouble over the years for many ...

    All corn and other produce were used to pay landlords, so when people were forced to eat their corn or starve they couldn't pay landlords and were evicted. Hunger made people desperate, "there have been attacks on flour mills in Clonnel by people whose bones protruded through their skin which covered them staring hollow eyes."

  2. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    Source B is taken from Simon Winchester's report for the Guardian. This can seem rather transparent in places, but it has to be realised that this is a respectable newspaper and would want to retain credibility by appearing to be fair in its evidence.

  1. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    So, they see it as taking a huge political risk in the hope that they can persuade, in particular, the Unionist community in Northern Ireland to throw in their lot with Ireland rather than with Britain. It's perfectly understandable why particularly people in the political establishment, and Unionists, would say

  2. bloody sunday assignment 1

    They were soon called the National Volunteers. Many Irish Volunteers refused to fight with Britain in the first year, as they believed the reason that the British went to war was completely unrelated to them- the enormous number of casualties convinced more people that the Irish Volunteers were right as well as the threat of conscription.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work