• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Both sources G and H are charts showing statistics about how successful the police were in enforcing prohibition. Source G shows statistics on how many illegal stills were seized

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework- David Whalley D. Study Sources G and H Do these two sources prove that prohibition was successful? I do not think that sources G and H can prove that prohibition was successful. Both sources G and H are charts showing statistics about how successful the police were in enforcing prohibition. Source G shows statistics on how many illegal stills were seized and how many gallons of spirits were seized from the year 1921 to 1929. ...read more.

Middle

So source G does not really prove anything because it has two possible meanings and it does not comment on if poverty was reduced or how many gangsters were arrested either, two more things that prohibition was meant to do. Source H is a chart of figures published by the Philadelphia Police Department showing the number of arrests for drink related offences from 1920 to 1925. The number of arrested drunks rises severely over the years from 14,313 to 51,361 people; however, this again does not prove anything because it does not state how many drunks there ...read more.

Conclusion

It is possible that this number falls because less people are drinking openly because of prohibition; the reason why there are more drunk drivers is probably because people are driving home rather than walking to avoid being spotted so easily. So overall these sources are not as useful as they may seem. They have strong limits as they only show half the data required to judge the success of prohibition in most cases. The sources could be more useful in proving that prohibition was a success if more information was shown, for example the whole number of drunk drivers there were instead of just those who were arrested. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Source D shows a report from the Jarrow Public Health Committee, published in 1933. ...

    The source is somewhat limited because you do not know if the Death Rates for Jarrow has stayed constant during the years 1932 to 1935, or if they had increased or decreased before reaching 15 in 1936. However the National Average has decreased since 1931, dropping to 9.

  2. Prohibition Sources Questions

    how it made matters worse than it already was, as many found a way around the law. The total number of arrests went up from 20,443 in 1920 to 58,517 in 1925, all happening in one state of America, Philadelphia.

  1. Study sources G and H - Do these sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    Source H also increases, but this shows people being caught committing drunk-related offences. This could show that the police were successfully enforcing Prohibition. However, it could also show that more people are committing crime, as there are more drunk-related offences.

  2. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    This is clearly not the action of a responsible man. Furthermore the source also suggests that alcohol leads to other vices as well, illustrated by the men smoking and gambling in the background of the source. Considering all these messages of Source C, it is clear that the source is

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    have agreed that the consequence of prohibition was crime and that it had totally failed. I believe source A is more balanced and measured whereas source B seems to be more anti alcohol. b) The two posters, sources C and D are clearly both in favour of Prohibition, although both posters were written before Prohibition was introduced.

  2. America In 1920’s Sources Coursework

    Meaning that "freedom and opportunity" was now available to the youth, even though many didn't approve. ""Flapper," was the name given to fashionable, usually wealthy, young women whose clothes and behaviour seemed deliberately to challenge the older generation." In general the above sources gave mixed reliability and coverage of the facts.

  1. Roosevelt Sources Questions

    4) Source E is against Roosevelt. In this source the cartoonist shows a pump representing Roosevelt New Deal and is shown to be leaking. This shows that the New Deal is not working as Roosevelt told it. There are 'leaks' in the New Deal, which means there are faults with the

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework

    The representation of the American effort to limit the sale of alcohol, Uncle Sam, is utterly overwhelmed by this and cannot cope with only a hammer to break the bottles. The evidence in Source D heavily supports this message as it states that only "2836" agents were employed to enforce

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work