• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically Assess 3 Causes of World War 1

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically Assess 3 Causes of World War 1 Nationalism is being a strong supporter of the rights and interests of one's country. It was very high in the 19th century and nations which had not obtained independence by 1900 were determined to do so as it gave groups of subject peoples the idea of forming independent nations of their own. In 1815, the Congress of Vienna took place. This was a conference held in Vienna in Austria between ambassadors from the major powers in Europe. This conference left people under the control of local dynasts or other nations and ignored nationalism in favour of preserving the peace, however, revolutions and strong nationalistic movements during the late 19th century dissolved the anti-nationalistic work of the Congress of Vienna and led to the unification of Italy in 1861 and Germany in 1871 after they were left as divided states by the Congress. Nationalism was the most imposing cause of war in the late 19th and early 20th century as it caused a problem ultimately due to the fact that a nation's goals came into conflict with the goals of other nations. An example of this would be Serbian nationalism. Serbia led a movement to unite the regions of Slavs. ...read more.

Middle

By 1905, 84 percent of Serbia's exports were going to Austria-Hungary and 53 percent of Serbia's imports were from Austria-Hungary. However, when they were at war Austria blocked Serbian pigs from entering ports on the excuse that they carried diseases. This gave the Austro-Serbian war the alternate name of the "Pig War". Austro-Serbian relations continued to deteriorate over Bosnia as well. Anti-Habsburg secret societies were popular among Bosnian Serbs and upon that "The Black Hand" came to. This was an extremely dangerous Serbian nationalist society. "The Black Hand" was willing to sponsor all kinds of anti-Habsburg mischief in Bosnia and in the end supplied the weapons used in the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914. Nationalism also led on to another cause of the war. It led European countries to compete for the largest army and navy or the greatest industrial development. This is known as militarism and this led onto the Arms Race. Militarism is when the army and military forces are given high profile by the government and it was a deciding factor in the outbreak of world war one even though it came as an outcome of nationalism. Military expansionist policies helped facilitate the commencement of war and helped make it a global event as many countries became intimidated by Germany's extensive militaristic goals. ...read more.

Conclusion

It was in this year that the triple alliance broke down completely when Italy refused to enter war on the side of her allies, the excuse being that she saw no aggressive act had taken place against Austria-Hungary. The Triple Alliance and Triple Entente caused a build up of international tensions due to the division of Europe into two armed camps and they also caused more and more countries to be dragged into the war making it a world war. Nationalism, militarism and alliances were all major causes of world war one and each of the factors led onto the next. Nationalism is probably the most imposing cause of tension leading onto the war and caused a problem ultimately due to the fact that one nation's goals came into conflict with the goals of other nations. Militarism was encouraged by nationalism and was a deciding factor in the outbreak of war as many countries felt the need to follow Germany's vigorous militaristic expansionist policies out of pride and intimidation. This fear of Germany led on to alliances being formed which ended up leading more countries into war than there may have been originally. Therefore, all three of the mentioned causes were equally responsible for causing World War One. ?? ?? ?? ?? Jade Okba IB1 History Teacher: John Marrill ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Japanese Militarism

    Even though the navy was constrained by various treaties such as the one signed at the Washington Conference, it was still regarded as the best in the pacific. The army also had the advantage of having the emperor as their commander-in-chief.

  2. Questions on World War One.

    finding Germany's allies, as Bismarck himself said, had been full of "perplexities". these "perplexities" could have brought about a Russo-German alliance. But in 1879 and 1882 it seemed that could be successfully avoided. Germany could enter into an alliance with the antagonist of Russia and still keep the Tsardom within Berlin's orbit.

  1. Cause of World War 1

    Britain had strong problems with Germany's nationalistic militarism, and so fought against it (and trying to compete to make the nation seem better to the people.) France had fierce issues with Germany over the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, the giving up of Alsace-Lorraine (a French province)

  2. In 1914 Europe plunged in to the abyss of total war due to the ...

    In addition, Russian defeat in the Russo-Japanese War accelerated Russian anxiousness to win British support for a revision in relation to the international regulations closing the exit from the Black Sea in time of war. In 1907 the Anglo-Russian Convention also reconciled old differences on the frontiers between the two empires, particularly in Persia, Afghanistan and Tibet.

  1. Causes of World War 1.

    Frances refusal to co-operate made war very possible. The French were conscious of Britain's naval supremacy so they back down. So in November Marchand was ordered to with draw from Fashoda. This is not such an important incident as a background cause to World War 1.

  2. Causes of World War 1

    European countries so much, that it would have made war an inevitable fact and reality. Many Historians have said, 'Weltpolitik was only a half-hearted policy' (Paul Schroeder), and that it was only inviting the other countries to go to war.

  1. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    Time and peace were essential ingredients that he needed in order to allow Germany to solve her internal differences and to prepare herself for the gigantic role that she was to play in international affairs. Bismarck described himself as a "Friedensfanatiker" - a fanatic for peace - and this was true.

  2. Was the Kaiser the main influence to start World War1?

    The emperor, Franz Joseph was furious, and declared war on Serbia, but Austria Hungary wasn't going to risk a war with the Russians and asked the Germans for help should the Russians invade. When Austria invaded Serbia, the Serbs asked the Russians for help, and the Germans declared war on the Russians.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work