• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

custers last stand

Extracts from this document...


Why did the U.S. Army lose the battle of "Little Big Horn?" Custer was a high spirited man and sometimes too much of a high spirit would mean he would not be able to think rationally, which also means he would push his men to the limit and make them exhausted and therefore unfit to fight, which can cause low morale. This may have been a factor in making his soldiers surrender. Custer also had a tended to be ignorant, was known for stupidity and selfishness as he completely ignored his scouts and charged at the largest Indian collection in the West with an ammunition supply that was below par. ...read more.


Custer may have made many bad decisions and may have many faults but he cannot be blamed for Brigadier General Terry's bad judgement, for Sitting Bull to have had a Sun dance which predicted the natives winning. He also did not know of the tactical abilities of Crazy Horse; such as to out flank the 7th Cavalry. This is very important as it meant that Custer and his men couldn't retreat to high land where they would be able to dig in and hold out. The natives instead caught Custer's men off guard and massacre them, even if they wanted to surrender as Custer didn't ever take male prisoners. ...read more.


I feel the main reasons of the 7th Cavalry losing are, Terry allowing Custer to command, which is connected to Custer taking a short cut, because he wanted to be seen as a war hero, I see these 2 reasons as bad decisions. But I feel the worst of those was Custer taking a short cut as this meant he would arrive ahead of schedule and was heavily out numbered. On the other hand, the natives were ready to fight and this was due to the important decisions made by Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull such as the Sun Dance which gave the natives belief because the "Great Spirit" had told them they would win, whereas Crazy Horse had learnt his tactics, most likely, by watching the Americans soldiers fight. ?? ?? ?? ?? C. McInnes 10D ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat at the battle of ...

    3 star(s)

    Ready for battle once more, Custer was put back in command of his regiment. Again Custer began to make more mistakes. He had poor tactics and a lack of organisation. Custer was told by his commander 'Don't be greedy, wait for us'.

  2. beacon hill

    A different strength, but a very similar strength to the one I discussed before is that source 2 and 8 are both written by local historians, this is very reliable because they are likely to evaluate all the evidence and they know the area well.

  1. "Why did war on the Western Front last so long?"

    In conclusion Source A and Source B agree about the conditions because they give the impression that it's hard to cross No Man's Land because of the barbed wire. However, the differences between the sources are that in Source B we see definite signs of life and an attempt to

  2. The American West :General George Armstrong Custer 1839 – 1878

    Source H was again written by a man under Custer's command, a sergeant. He says that Custer was "aloof and removed", and so did not speak to his men, which backs up Source F, as both seem to suggest he only thinks of himself - "Worthy of little consideration". 4)

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    "Brave to the point of idiocy" stated Tim Slessor from the video documentary. It is both positive and negative, as it is a contradiction with irony, because being a historian he would be looking at the facts, but many historians study the evidence and write about their views on it.

  2. The Sun Dance.

    Great bear would only let me marry Naomi on the condition that I took part in the ancient ritual, The Sun Dance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work